Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology ((HHLM))

  • 1183 Accesses

Abstract

Computing power has increased dramatically in the last 30 years leading to new technologies and possibilities. This could be better described as an evolution rather than revolution. However, two factors are creating global revolutions. They are environment and sustainability and biotechnology. This chapter explores the link between the two and the potential of industrial biotechnology to contribute to addressing global challenges in a systemic way; looking at the global megatrends and challenges, sustainable development goals, planetary boundaries, GDP, economic and qualitative growth, circular economy, distributed manufacturing, health and nutrition, new related technologies, leveraging other emerging technologies, and ITC. It looks not just at direct impact but indirect secondary and tertiary effects. It hints at the potential of combining biotechnology with the increased computing power and move to the digital world. Finally, it highlights that there are potential disadvantages and risks in addition to the benefits and that these need to be mitigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 359.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Some have referred to Industry 4.0 too, and the World Economic Forum has adopted this term for its work around digitization.

  2. 2.

    Spearheaded by the United Nations through a deliberative process involving its 193 Member States, as well as global civil society, the goals are contained in paragraph 54 United Nations Resolution A/RES/70/1 of 25 September 2015. (1) The Resolution is a broader intergovernmental agreement that acts as the Post 2015 Development Agenda (successor to the Millennium Development Goals). The SDGs build on the Principles agreed upon under Resolution A/RES/66/288, popularly known as The Future We Want. (2) It is a nonbinding document released as a result of Rio + 20 Conference held in 2012 in Rio de Janeiro, in Brazil.

  3. 3.

    IMF data.

References

  • Bachmann RT, Johnson AC, Edyvean RGJ (2014) Int Biodeter Biodegr 86:225–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burke L, Maidens J (2004) Reefs at risk in the Caribbean. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawley J, Meyerhoffer C (2012) The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach. J Health Econ 31:219–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choi YJ, Lee SY (2013) Nature 502:571–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (1972) In defense of a steady-state economy. Am J Agric Econ 54:945–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (1979) Entropy, growth, and the political economy of scarcity. In: Smith VK (ed) Scarcity and growth reconsidered. John Hopkins University Press, Maryland, pp 67–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (1991) Steady-state economics, 2nd edn. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton A (2007) PNAS 104(33):13232–13237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton A, Arora R (2009) Life at the top: the benefits of height. Econ Hum Biol 7(2):133–136

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Debergh P, Bilsen V, Van de Velde E (2016) Jobs and growth generated by industrial biotechnology in Europe, for Europabio. EuropaBio, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim Z, Inderwildi OR, King DA (2014) Macroeconomic impacts of oil price volatility: mitigation and resilience. Front Energy 8:9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fioramonti L (2017) Wellbeing economy: success in a world without growth. Pan MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad L, Hawkes C, Webb P, Thomas S, Beddington J, Waage J, Flynn D (2016) A new global research agenda for food. Nature 540:30–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inderwildi OR, Siegrist F, Dickson RD, Hagan AJ (2014) The feedstock curve: novel fuel resources, environmental conservation, the force of economics and the renewed east-west power struggle. Appl Petrochem Res 4:157–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King DA, Inderwildi OR, Williams A, Hagan A (2010) The World Economic Forum

    Google Scholar 

  • Latouche S (2003) Pour une société de décroissance Le Monde Diplomatique, Nov 2003. http://bit.ly/5ZOtmN

  • Latouche S (2004) Why less should be so much more. Degrowth economics. Le Monde Diplomatique, Nov 2004. http://bit.ly/4yOHfY

  • Latouche S (2009) Farewell to growth. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Maradana RP, Pradhan RP, Dash S, Gaurav K, Jayakumar M, Chatterjee D (2017) J Innov Entrep 6:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Lopez B (2008) Conserv Biol 22(3):505–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW III (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally R (2017) Crude Volatility: The History and the Future of Beam-Bust Oil Prices, Columbia University Press, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Carmona A (2013) Growth: a discussion of the margins of economic and ecological thought. In: Meuleman L (ed) Transgovernance, advancing sustainability governance. SpringerLink.com. ISBN: 978–3–642-28,008-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadowski MI, Grant C, Fell TS (2016) Harnessing QbD, programming languages, and automation for reproducible biology. Trends Biotechnol 34(3):214–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Searchinger TD, Hamburg SP, Melillo J, Chameides W, Havlik P, Kammen DM, Likens GE, Lubowski RN, Obersteiner M, Oppenheimer M, Robertson GP, Schlesinger WH, David Tilman G (2009) Science 326:527–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shabnam N (2014) Natural disasters and economic growth: a review. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 5:157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KA, Searchinger TD (2012) GCB Bioenergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01100.x

  • Stahel W, Clift R (2016) Taking stock of industrial ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 137–158

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stern N (2006) Stern review on the economics of climate change. Government of the United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner W (2007) Bioscience 57(10):868–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (2011) The green economy

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future (The Bruntland report). Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf M (2015) Same as it ever was, why the techno-optimists are wrong. Foreign Affairs, Jul/Aug 2015

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Hagan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hagan, A. (2017). Global Consequences of Bioproduction of Fuels and Chemicals: An Introduction. In: Lee, S. (eds) Consequences of Microbial Interactions with Hydrocarbons, Oils, and Lipids: Production of Fuels and Chemicals. Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50436-0_378

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics