Inspiring Positive Change: The Paradoxical Mind of Robert E. Quinn

Living reference work entry

Later version available View entry history



This chapter focuses on the work of Robert E. Quinn. He has devoted his professional and personal life to developing himself and others into understanding what it means to be an inspiring change agent. From his life lessons as a child to his unconventional insights as a college student to his work in church life, and especially in his scholarship, Quinn has used key life experiences to learn and grow. Every step of the way, he has sought to understand, document, and ignite transformational experiences. In this way, he is an exemplary applied behavioral scientist, continually integrating scholarship and practice. Quinn’s major contributions include (1) the development of the competing values model which embraces the role of tension and paradox to understand organizational life, (2) articulating the essential role of self-empowerment in inspiring positive change, and (3) challenging the assumption that leadership is less about having a position of authority and more about having a mind-set (the fundamental state of leadership). In the last decade, Quinn has brought these different contributions together as a cofounder of a new field of organizational studies, named positive organizational scholarship, which focuses on the science for bringing out the very best in organizations, teams, and individuals. Quinn’s contributions extend beyond these content areas as he is also a masterful teacher and mentor who helps others envision their full potential. For all of these reasons, Quinn’s personal vision to inspire positive change has been fulfilled on many dimensions.


Transformational leadership Positive leadership Moral power 


  1. Bateson, G. (2002). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. Reading: Addison-Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  3. Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, K., & Spreitzer, G. (2012). Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (Eds.). (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  6. Cameron, K., Quinn, R., DeGraff, J., & Thakor, A. (2014). Competing values leadership (2nd ed.). New York: Edgar Elger.Google Scholar
  7. Dutton, J., Worline, M., Frost, P., & Maitlis, S. (2006). Explaining compassion organizing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 59–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lawrence, K., Quinn, R., & Lenk, P. (2009). Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psychometric properties of a new instrument. The Leadership Quarterly, 50(2), 189–205.Google Scholar
  9. Quinn, R. (1984). Applying the competing values approach to leadership. In J. Hunt, D. Hosking, C. Schriesheim, & R. Steward (Eds.), Leaders and managers: International perspectives on managerial behavior and leadership. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  10. Quinn, R. (1996). Deep change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Quinn, R. (2000). Change the world: How ordinary people can accomplish extraordinary results. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Quinn, R. (2004). Building the bridge as you walk on it: A guide for leading change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Quinn, R. (2005). Moments of greatness: Entering the fundamental state of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 83(7), 75–83.Google Scholar
  14. Quinn, R. (2015). The positive organization: Breaking free from conventional cultures, constraints and beliefs. San Francisco: Berrett Koehler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Quinn, R., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29(1), 33–51.Google Scholar
  16. Quinn, R., & Cooper, R. (1993). Implications of the competing values model for management information systems. Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(1), 175–201.Google Scholar
  17. Quinn, R., & Hart, S. (1993). Roles executives play: CEO’s, behavioral complexity, and firm performance. Human Relations, 46, 543–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Quinn, R., & Hooijberg, R. (1993). Behavioral complexity and the development of effective managers. In R. Phillips & J. Hunt (Eds.), Strategic leadership: A multi-organizational – level perspective (pp. 161–176). Westport: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  19. Quinn, R., & McGrath, M. (1985). The transformation of organizational culture: A competing values perspective. In P. Frost, L. Moore, M. Louis, C. Lundberg, & J. Martin (Eds.), Organizational culture and the meaning of life in the workplace. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Quinn, R., & Quinn, R. (2009). Lift: Becoming a positive force in any situation. San Francisco: Berrett-Kohler.Google Scholar
  21. Quinn, R. W., & Quinn, R. E. (2015). Lift: The fundamental state of leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  22. Quinn, R., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363–377.Google Scholar
  23. Quinn, R., Hildebrandt, H., & Rogers, P. (1991a). A competing values framework for analyzing presentational communication in management contexts. Journal of Business Communication, 28(3), 213–232. Summer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Quinn, R., Spreitzer, G., & Hart, S. (1991b). Challenging the assumptions of bipolarity: Interpenetration and managerial effectiveness. In S. Srivatva (Ed.), Executive and organizational continuity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Quinn, R., Kahn, J., & Mandl, M. (1995a). Perspectives on organization change: Exploring movement at the interface. In J. Greenberg’s (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (pp. 109–134). Hoboken: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  26. Quinn, R., Denison, D., & Hooijberg, R. (1995b). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Quinn, R. E., Heynoski, K., Thomas, M., & Spreitzer, G. (2014). The best teacher in you: Accelerating learning and changing lives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Roberts, L. M., Dutton, J., Spreitzer, G., Heaphy, E., & Quinn, R. (2005a). Composing the reflected best self-portrait: Building pathways for becoming extraordinary in work organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 712–736. Fall 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roberts, L. M., Spreitzer, G., Dutton, J., Heaphy, E., & Barker, B. (2005b). How to play to your strengths. Harvard Business Review, 83(1), 75–80.Google Scholar
  30. Spreitzer, G., & Quinn, R. (2001). A company of leaders: Five disciplines for unleashing the power in your workforce. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Cameron, K. (1988). Paradox and transformation: Towards a theory of change in organization and management. Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  2. Quinn, R. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Quinn, R. (2012). The deep change field guide: A personal course to discovering the leader within. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Quinn, R., & Cameron, K. (1988). Paradox and transformation: Towards a theory of change in organization and management. Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  5. Quinn, R., & Thakor, A. (2014). Imbue the organization with a higher purpose. In J. Dutton & G. Spreitzer (Eds.), How to be a positive leader. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  6. Quinn, R., Spreitzer, G., & Fletcher, J. (1995). Excavating the paths of meaning, renewal and empowerment: A typology of managerial high performance myths. Journal of Management Inquiry, 4(1), 16–39.Google Scholar
  7. Quinn, R., Spreitzer, G., & Brown, M. (2000). Changing others through changing ourselves: The transformation of human systems. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(2), 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Quinn, R., Faerman, S., Thompson, M., McGrath, M., & Bright, D. (2015). Becoming a master manager: A competency framework (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Weick, K., & Quinn, R. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361–386.Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ross School of Business, Center for Positive OrganizationsUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations