Skip to main content

A Conceptual Framework for Authentic Competence Assessment in VET: A Logic Design Model

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Vocational Education and Training

Abstract

Authentic assessment of competence remains a central target of VET research; adequate measurement approaches clearly are rare though a prerequisite for accountable systems to authorize access to vocational activities, as well as for international qualification acknowledgment. The paper outlines a conceptual framework of authentic assessment as well as respective evaluation methods. Though authentic assessment is broadly discussed in scientific literature, coherent definitions and frameworks with respect to the assessment of vocational competence are scant. However, drawing on different streams of authenticity research, it can be suggested to operationalize “authentic competence assessment” by six major key characteristics:

  1. 1.

    Authentic modes of assessment

  2. 2.

    Relevant item sampling

  3. 3.

    Complexity of tasks

  4. 4.

    Staged embedding

  5. 5.

    Process orientation

  6. 6.

    Social interaction

The paper substantiates these characteristics, places them in a logic assessment model, gives practical implementation examples (commercial domain), and finally introduces adequate evaluation methods by which this framework can be accounted for.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achtenhagen F, Weber S (2003) “Authentizität” in der Gestaltung beruflicher Lernumgebungen. In: Bredow A, Dobischat R, Rottmann J (eds) Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik von A-Z. Schneider, Baltmannsweiler, pp 185–199

    Google Scholar 

  • AERA/NCME (2014) The standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Alessi SM (1988) Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations. J Comp Based Instr 15(2):40–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res 18(1):32–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1997) The Jasper project: lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin JC (1993) Four misconceptions about authentic learning. Educ Leadersh 50(7):78–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Custer RL, Schell J, McAlister BD, Scott JL, Hoepfl M (2000) Using authentic assessment in vocational education, Information Series No. 381. ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher VK, Winther E (2017) Instructional Sensitivity in Vocational Education. Learning and Instruction 53(1):21–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday, Garden City

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulikers JT, Bastiaens TJ, Kirschner PA (2004) A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educ Technol Res Dev 52(3):67–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulikers JT, Bastiaens TJ, Kirschner PA, Kester L (2008) Authenticity is in the eye of the beholder: student and teacher perceptions of assessment authenticity. J Vocat Educ Train 60(4):401–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker W (2003) Action regulation theory: a practical tool for the design of modern work processes? Eur J Work Organ Psychol 12(2):105–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig J, Jude N (2007) Empirische Erfassung von Kompetenzen und psychometrische Kompetenz-modelle. In: Hartig J, Klieme E (eds) Möglichkeiten und Voraussetzungen technologiebasierter Kompetenzdiagnostik. BMBF, Bonn, pp 17–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington J, Herrington A (1998) Authentic assessment and multimedia: how university students respond to a model of authentic assessment. High Educ Res Dev 17(3):305–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington J, Oliver R (2000) An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educ Technol Res Dev 48(3):23–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotz VK, Winther E (2017) On improving current assessment practices – competence measurement in the domain of business and commerce. In: Leutner D, Fleischer J, Grünkorn J, Klieme E (eds) Competence assessment in education: research, models and instruments. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 221–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotz VK, Winther E, Festner D (2015) Modeling the development of vocational competence: a psychometric model for economic domains. Vocat Learn 8(3):247–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopriva R (2001) ELL validity research designs for state academic assessments: an outline of five research designs evaluating the validity of large-scale assessments for English language learners and other test takers. Paper prepared at the Council of Chief State School Officers Meeting, Houston, TX, June 22–23, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Mislevy RJ, Almond RG, Lukas JF (2003) A brief introduction to evidence centered design. Educational Testing Service, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder M, Weigel T, Collins K (2006) The concept of competence concept in the development of vocational education and training in selected EU member states. A critical analysis. J Vocat Educ Train 59(1):65–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann FM (1997) Authentic assessment in social studies: standards and examples. In: Phye GD (ed) Handbook of classroom assessment: learning, achievement, and adjustment. Academic, San Diego, pp 359–380

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2016) The survey of adult skills: reader’s companion, OECD Skills Studies, 2nd edn. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264258075-en

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino JW (2012) The design of an assessment system focused on student achievement. A learning sciences perspective on issues of competence, growth and measurement. In: Bernholt S, Neumann K, Nentwig P (eds) Making it tangible – learning outcomes in science education. Waxmann, Münster, pp 79–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Preiß P (2005) Entwurf eines Kompetenzkonzepts für den Inhaltsbereich Rechnungswesen/Controlling. In: Gonon P, Klauser F, Nickolaus R, Huisinga R (eds) Kompetenz, Kognition und neue Konzepte der beruflichen Bildung. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 67–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves TC, Okey JR (1996) Alternative assessment for constructivist learning environments. In: Wilson BG (ed) Constructivist learning environments: case studies in instructional design. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, pp 191–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Primo M, Shavelson R (1996) Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. J Res Sci Teach 33(6):569–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangmeister J, Winther E, Deutscher V, Bley S, Kreuzer C, Weber S (2018) Designing Competence Assessment in VET for a Digital Future. In: Ifenthaler D (eds) Digital Workplace Learning. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Savery JR, Duffy TM (1995) Problem-based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educ Technol 35(5):31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell J (2000) Think about authentic learning and then authentic testing. In: Custer RL, Schell J, McAlister BD, Scott JL, Hoepfl M (eds). (2000)Using authentic assessment in vocational education, Information Series No. 381. ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, Columbus, pp 7–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt JU (2000) Prüfungen auf dem Prüfstand – Betriebe beurteilen die Aussagekraft von Prüfungen. Berufsbildung Wiss Praxis 29(5):27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Segers M, Dochy F, De Corte E (1999) Assessment practices and students’ knowledge profiles in a problem-based curriculum. Learn Environ Res 2:191–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson RJ, Seminara J (1968) Effect of lunar gravity on man’s performance of basic maintenance tasks. J Appl Psychol 52(3):177–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachowiak H (1980) Der Weg zum Systematischen Neopragmatismus und das Konzept der Allgemeinen Modelltheorie. In: Stachowiak H (ed) Modelle und Modelldenken im Unterricht. Klinkhardt, Bad Heilbrunn, pp 9–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins GP (1993) Assessing student performance: exploring the purpose and limits of testing. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Winther E (2010) Kompetenzmessung in der beruflichen Bildung. wbv, Bielefeld

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viola Deutscher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Deutscher, V., Winther, E. (2018). A Conceptual Framework for Authentic Competence Assessment in VET: A Logic Design Model. In: McGrath, S., Mulder, M., Papier, J., Suart, R. (eds) Handbook of Vocational Education and Training. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49789-1_80-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49789-1_80-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49789-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49789-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics