Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Living Edition
| Editors: Jennifer Vonk, Todd Shackelford

Positive Reinforcement

  • Roberto BarataEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_761-1

Synonyms

Definition

Positive reinforcement is an operant procedure in which the addition of a stimulus increases an aspect of a particular behavior. “A positive reinforcer is everything that increases the frequency, intensity or duration of a certain behavior when presented either simultaneously or immediately after that behavior takes place.” (Abrantes 2013, p. 12).

Introduction

Positive reinforcement it is a widely accepted and used term especially in animal training, because of the pleasant connotations it creates. Skinner’s behavioral model analysis shows more efficiency of using several reinforcement models in behavior modification of humans and nohumans species (Skinner, 1966, 1969, 1987).

‘Positive’ does not describe the nature of the consequence; it indicates the addition of a stimulus. ‘Reinforcement’ indicates a strengthening of an aspect of the behavior.

In operant conditioning, reinforcers (and punishers)...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abrantes, R. (2013). The 20 principles all animal trainers must know. Naperville: Wakan Tanka Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Hull, C. L. (1952). A behavior system. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Iwata, B. A. (1987). Negative reinforcement in applied behavior analysis: An emerging technology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20(4), 361–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Iwata, B. A. (2006). On the distinction between positive and negative reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(1), 121–123.Google Scholar
  5. Mcfarland, D. (2006). A dictionary of animal behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Skinner, B. F. (1966). The behaviour of organisms: An experimental analyses. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  7. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement, a theoretical analysis. New York: Meredith Corporation.Google Scholar
  8. Skinner, B. F. (1987). Antecedents. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 447–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sy, J. R. C., & Borrero, C. S. W. (2010). Characterizing response-reinforcer relations in the natural environment: Exploratory matching analyses. The Psychological Record, 60, 609–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ethology Institute, IntCambridgeUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Kenneth Leising
    • 1
  1. 1.Texas Christian UniversityForth WorthUSA