Skip to main content

Promiscuity

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Definition

Indiscriminate mating with multiple partners

What Is Promiscuity?

Promiscuity means mating with multiple partners in an indiscriminate way, that is, without any selection-based process or quality-based discrimination of mating partners. Contrary to popular belief, promiscuity does not merely mean mating or engaging in sexual activities profusely with different partners. The misuse of the term “promiscuity” in behavioral sciences and evolutionary biology has been pointed out before (Elgar et al. 2013), and the improper use of the term extends to other areas including evolutionary psychology.

The “without choice” qualifier of the term is important because in spite of the fact that males and females mate with multiple partners in most sexually reproducing animal species, in the majority of these species sexual interactions are governed by mate selection criteria. Thus, applying the strict and correct definition of promiscuity would render very few animals promiscuous indeed....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnqvist, G., & Rowe, L. (2005). Sexual conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barash, D. P. (2016). Out of eden: The surprising consequences of polygamy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barash, D. P., & Lipton, J. E. (2001). The myth of monogamy. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. R. (2000). Promiscuity: An evolutionary history of sperm competition and sexual conflict. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. R., & Møller, A. P. (Eds.). (1998). Sperm competition and sexual selection. San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edward, D. A., & Chapman, T. (2011). The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26, 647–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgar, M., Jones, T., & McNamara, K. (2013). Promiscuous words. Frontiers in Zoology, 10, 66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. P., & Sherman, C. D. H. (2013). Sexual selection and the evolution of egg-sperm interactions in broadcast-spawning invertebrates. The Biological Bulletin, 224, 166–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. P., Garcia-Gonzalez, F., & Marshall, D. J. (2007). Sources of genetic and phenotypic variance in fertilization rates and larval traits in a sea urchin. Evolution, 61, 2832–2838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. P., Garcia-Gonzalez, F., Almbro, M., Robinson, O., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (2012). Assessing the potential for egg chemoattractants to mediate sexual selection in a broadcast spawning marine invertebrate. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 2855–2861.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Gonzalez, F., & Simmons, L. W. (2005). The evolution of polyandry: Intrinsic sire effects contribute to embryo viability. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18, 1097–1103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Gonzalez, F., Yasui, Y., & Evans, J. P. (2015). Mating portfolios: Bet-hedging, sexual selection and female multiple mating. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 282, 20141525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, S. C., Owens, I. P. F., & Thuman, K. A. (2002). Extra pair paternity in birds: A review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2195–2212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janicke, T., Haderer, I. K., Lajeunesse, M. J., & Anthes, N. (2016). Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. Science Advances, 2, e1500983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennions, M. D., & Petrie, M. (1997). Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: A review of causes and consequences. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 72, 283–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, H., & Jennions, M. D. (2008). Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 919–948.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, H., & Mappes, J. (2013). Multiple mating by females is a natural outcome of a null model of mate encounters. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 146, 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, H., Jennions, M. D., & Brooks, R. (2006). Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 37, 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larmuseau, M. H. D., Matthijs, K., & Wenseleers, T. (2016). Cuckolded fathers rare in human populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31, 327–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitan, D. R., & Ferrell, D. L. (2006). Selection on gamete recognition proteins depends on sex, density, and genotype frequency. Science, 312, 267–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2009). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 631–651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lukas, D., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2013). The evolution of social monogamy in mammals. Science, 341, 526–530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, B. D., & Pitcher, T. E. (2005). Genetic quality and sexual selection: An integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Molecular Ecology, 14, 19–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–311.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, L. W., Firman, R. C., Rhodes, G., & Peters, M. (2004). Human sperm competition: Testis size, sperm production and rates of extrapair copulations. Animal Behaviour, 68, 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In R. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. S., Flinn, M. V., & Hill, K. R. (2010). Evolutionary history of partible paternity in lowland South America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 19195–19200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasui, Y., & Garcia-Gonzalez, F. (2016). Bet-hedging as a mechanism for the evolution of polyandry, revisited. Evolution, 70, 385–397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Garcia-Gonzalez, F. (2017). Promiscuity. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_423-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_423-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics