Skip to main content

Alloparental Care

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 363 Accesses

Synonyms

Allocare; Allomother; Allomothering; Aunting; Auxiliary; Helper

Definition

“Alloparental care” is care that is directed by an individual (an alloparent) toward dependent young that are not their offspring (Wilson 1975). The act of providing alloparental care is referred to as “alloparenting.”

Types of Alloparental Care

Alloparental care has been reported widely across the animal kingdom, specifically in birds (Koenig and Dickinson 2004), fishes (Wisenden 1999), invertebrates (Wilson 1971), and mammals (Solomon and French 1997). Animals employ a variety of strategies to produce and rear their young, which influences the ways that alloparents can contribute care. Most birds, fishes, and invertebrates lay eggs, while all mammals (aside from monotremes) give birth to live young. In most mammals, milk is the sole medium of nutrient intake for young during the first stage of life. In other taxa, young immediately feed on similar materials to mature individuals, either with the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Brouwer, L., Richardson, D. S., & Komdeur, J. (2012). Helpers at the nest improve late-life offspring performance: Evidence from a long-term study and a cross-foster experiment. PLoS, 7, e33167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2002). Breeding together: Kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science, 296, 69–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., Gaynor, D., Kansky, R., MacColl, A. D. C., McIlrath, G., Chadwick, P., Brotherton, P. N. M., O’Riain, J. M., Manser, M., & Skinner, J. D. (1998). Costs of cooperative behaviour in suricates (Suricata suricatta). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 265, 185–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., Russell, A. F., Sharpe, L. L., Young, A. J., Balmforth, Z., & McIlrath, G. M. (2002). Evolution and development of sex differences in cooperative behaviour in meerkats. Science, 297, 253–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, A. (1998). Evolution of helping behaviour in cooperatively breeding birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29, 141–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, T., English, S., & Lukas, D. (2017). The relationship between egg size and helper number in cooperative breeders: A meta-analysis across species. PeerJ, 5, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedigan, L. M. (1982). Kinship: The ties that bind. In L. M. Fedigan (Ed.), Primate paradigms: Sex roles and social bonds (pp. 121–133). Montreal: Eden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, A. J. (1978). Evolution of group territorial behavior and cooperative breeding. The American Naturalist, 112, 1091–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchwell, B. J. (1999). Investment strategies of breeders in avian cooperative breeding systems. The American Naturalist, 154, 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., & Coxworth, J. E. (2013). Grandmothers and the evolution of human longevity: A review of findings and future directions. Evolutionary Anthropology, 22, 294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinsohn, R. G., & Legge, S. (1999). The cost of helping. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 53–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, S. J., Bell, M. B. V., Mwanguhya, F., Kyabulima, S., Waldick, R. C., & Russell, A. F. (2009). Maternal weight, offspring competitive ability, and the evolution of communal breeding. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 729–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, W. D., & Dickinson, J. L. (2004). Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, H., Johnstone, R. A., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2001). The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268, 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström, J. (1999). Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 343–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, K. J., & Lukas, D. (2014). Revisiting non-offspring nursing: Allonursing evolves when the costs are low. Biology Letters, 10, 20140378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestripieri, D. (1994). Social structure, infant handling and mothering styles in group living Old World monkeys. International Journal of Primatology, 15, 531–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitani, J. C., & Watts, D. (1997). The evolution of non-maternal caretaking among anthropoid primates: Do helpers help? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 213–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, A. F., Young, A., Spong, G., Jordan, N., & Clutton-Brock, T. (2007). Helpers increase the reproductive potential of offspring in cooperative meerkats. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 513–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, A. F., Langmore, N. E., Gardner, J. L., & Kilner, R. M. (2008). Maternal investment tactics in superb fairy-wrens. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 275, 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santema, P., & Clutton-Brock. (2012). Dominant female meerkats do not use aggression to elevate work rates of helpers in response to increased brood demand. Animal Behaviour, 83, 827–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selander, R. K. (1964). Speciation in wrens of the genus Campylorhynchus. University of California Publications in Zoology, 74, 198–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, N. G., & French, J. A. (1997). Cooperative breeding in mammals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, H., Kohda, M., & Frommen, J. (2018). Helpers increase the reproductive success of breeders in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus obscurus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 72, 152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1971). The insect societies. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisenden, B. D. (1999). Alloparental care in fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 9, 45–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A. (1995). Altruism as a handicap: The limitations of kin selection and reciprocity. Journal of Avian Biology, 26, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zöttl, M., Vullioud, P., Mendonca, R., Tico, M. T., Gaynor, D., Mitchell, A., & Clutton-Brock, T. (2016). Differences in cooperative behaviour among Damaraland mole rats are consequences of an age-related polyethism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 10382–10387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Stead .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Crown

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Stead, S., Mucha, S., Bădescu, I. (2019). Alloparental Care. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1400-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1400-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics