Special Numerical Techniques to Joint Design

  • Andreas Öchsner
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history


The aim of this chapter is to introduce special numerical techniques. The first part covers special finite element techniques which reduce the size of the computational models. In the case of the substructuring technique, internal nodes as parts of a finite element mesh can be condensed out so that they do not contribute to the size of the global stiffness matrix. A postcomputational step allows to determine the unknowns of the condensed nodes. In the case of the submodel technique, the results of a finite element computation based on a coarse mesh are used as input, i.e., boundary conditions, for a refined submodel. The second part of this chapter introduces alternative approximation methods to solve the partial differential equations which describe the problem. The boundary element method is characterized by the fact that the problem is shifted to the boundary of the domain and as a result, the dimensionality of the problem is reduced by one. In the case of the finite difference method, the differential equation and the boundary conditions are represented by finite difference equations. Both methods are introduced based on a simple one-dimensional problem in order to demonstrate the major idea of each method. Furthermore, advantages and disadvantages of each alternative approximation methods are given in the light of the classical finite element simulation. Whenever possible, examples of application of the techniques in the context of adhesive joints are given.


Numerical method Finite element method Boundary element method Finite difference method Substructure Submodel Static condensation Superelement Internal forces Enforced displacement Weighted residual method Weighting function Strong formulation Weak formulation Inverse formulation Residuum Partial differential equation Fundamental solution Representation formula Load point 


  1. Banerjee PK (1994) Boundary element methods in engineering. McGraw-Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Beer G, Smith I, Duenser C (2008) The boundary element method with programming. Springer, WienzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Brebbia CA, Felles JCF, Wrobel JCF (1984) Boundary element techniques: theory and applications. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bushnell D, Almroth BO, Brogan F (1971) Finite-difference energy method for nonlinear shell analysis. Comput Struct 1:361–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrara P, Ferretti D (2013) A finite-difference model with mixed interface laws for shear tests of FRP plates bonded to concrete. Compos Part B Eng 54:329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collatz L (1966) The numerical treatment of differential equations. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. Cook RD, Malkus DS, Plesha ME, Witt RJ (2002) Concepts and applications of finite element analysis. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Crocombe AD, Bigwood DA (1992) Development of a full elasto-plastic adhesive joint design analysis. J Strain Anal Eng Des 27(4):211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. da Silva LFM, Campilho RDSG (2012) Advances in numerical modelling of adhesive joints. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. de G Allen DN (1955) Relaxation methods. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Dohrmann CR, Key SW, Heinstein MW (2000) A method for connecting dissimilar finite element meshes in two dimesions. Int J Numer Meth Eng 48:655–678CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Fish J, Belytschko T (2007) A first course in finite elements. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Forsythe GE, Wasow WR (1960) Finite-difference methods for partial differential equations. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaul L, Kögl M, Wagner M (2003) Boundary element methods for engineers and scientists. Springer, BerlinCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Gmür TC, Kauten RH (1993) Three-dimensional solid-to-beam transition elements for structural dynamics analysis. Int J Numer Meth Eng 36:1429–1444CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Gonçalves DJS, Campilho RDSG, Silva LFMD, Fernandes JLM (2014) The use of the boundary element method in the analysis of single lap joints. J Adhes 90:50–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Groth HL (1986) Calculation of stresses in bonded joints using the substructuring technique. Int J Adhes Adhes 6(1):31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IMSL Math/Library Manual (1997) Chapter 5: differential equations. Visual Numeric Inc, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  20. Javanbakht Z, Öchsner A (2017) Advanced finite element simulation with MSC Marc: application of user subroutines. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knight NF, Ransom JB, Griffin OH, Thompson DM (1991) Global/local methods research using a common structural analysis framework. Finite Elem Anal Des 9:91–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee SS (1998) Boundary element analysis of the stress singularity at the interface corner of viscoelastic adhesive layers. Int J Solids Struct 35(13):1385–1394CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Lourenço F, Aguirre IF, Alburquerque EL, Sollero P (2003) Boundary element analysis of panels reinforced by adhesive plates. In: Pesce CP (ed) Proceedings of the 17th international congress of mechanical engineering – COBEM 2003Google Scholar
  24. Love AEH (1944) A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity. Dover Publications, MineolazbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Mackerle J (1995a) Fastening and joining: finite element and boundary element analyses – a bibliography (1992–1994). Finite Elem Anal Des 20:205–215MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Mackerle J (1995b) Some remarks on progress with finite elements. Comput Struct 55:1101–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mitchell AR, Griffiths DF (1980) The finite difference method in partial differential equations. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Öchsner A (2016) Computational statics and dynamics: an introduction based on the finite element method. Springer, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Öchsner A, Merkel M (2013) One-dimensional finite elements: an introduction to the FE method. Springer, BerlinCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Paroissien E, Gaubert F, Veiga AD, Lachaud F (2013) Elasto-plastic analysis of bonded joints with macro-elements. J Adhes Sci Technol 27(13):1464–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pisa CD, Aliabadi MH (2015) Boundary element analysis of stiffened panels with repair patches. Eng Anal Bound Elem 56:162–175MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raamachandran J (2000) Boundary and finite elements – theory and problems. Alpha Science International, PangbourneGoogle Scholar
  33. Raghu ES (2009) Finite element modeling techiques in MSC.NASRAN and LS/DYNA. Arup, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Reddy JN (2006) An introduction to the finite element method. McGraw Hill, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  35. Sokolnikoff I (1956) Mathematical theory of elasticity. McGraw-Hill, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Southwell RV (1946) Relaxation methods in theoretical physics. Clarendon Press, OxfordzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Stratford T, Cadei J (2006) Elastic analysis of adhesion stresses for the design of a strengthening plate bonded to a beam. Constr Build Mater 20(1–2):34–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vable M, Maddi JR (2006) Boundary element analysis of adhesively bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 26:133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wahab MMA, Ashcroft IA, Crocombe AD (2004) A comparison of failure prediction methods for an adhesively bonded composite beam. J Strain Anal 39(2):173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang RX, Cuia J, Sinclair AN, Spelt JK (2003) Strength of adhesive joints with adherend yielding: I. Analytical model. J Adhes 79(1):23–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang ZY, Wang L, Guo W, Deng H, Tong JW, Aymerich F (2009) An investigation on strain/stress distribution around the overlap end of laminated composite single-lap joints. Compos Struct 89:589–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wen PH, Aliabadi MH, Young A (2002) Boundary element analysis of flat cracked panels with adhesively bonded patches. Eng Fract Mech 69:2129–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wen PH, Aliabadi MH, Young A (2003) Boundary element analysis of curved cracked panels with adhesively bonded patches. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58:43–61CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Xu W, Li G (2010) Finite difference three-dimensional solution of stresses in adhesively bonded composite tubular joint subjected to torsion. Int J Adhes Adhes 30:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Young A, Rooke DP (1992) Analaysis of patched and stiffened cracked panels using the boundary element method. Int J Solids Struct 29(17):2201–2216CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhao C, Hobbs BE, Mühlhaus HB, Ord A (1999) A consistent point-searching algorithm for solution interpolation in unstructured meshes consisting of 4-node bilinear quadrilateral elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 45:1509–1526CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (2000) The finite element method – volume 1: the basis. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Esslingen University of Applied SciencesFaculty of Mechanical EngineeringEsslingenGermany

Personalised recommendations