Advertisement

Aircraft Industry

  • Marléne Isaksson
Living reference work entry

Abstract

  • In the manufacture of aircraft, traditional mechanical techniques are used for the assembly, often combined with chemical techniques. Handling and exposure to metals and chemicals are therefore extensive.

  • Occupational skin diseases in this industry are well known.

  • Irritant contact dermatitis is considered to be more common than allergic contact dermatitis.

  • Common allergic contactants in an aircraft factory are sealants, epoxy resins, epoxy resin accelerators, preservatives, chromates, and nickel.

  • It is important to patch test with work materials since many chemicals used in the trade are not present in commercially available patch test series.

  • Subungual pulpitis caused by handling of epoxy resins and sealants based on synthetic rubber is considered to be specific for the aircraft industry.

  • Minimizing the contact with skin-irritating chemicals and/or allergenic chemicals by using proper protective clothing when “no touch” techniques cannot be employed is also important.

Keywords

Aircraft industry Occupational Metals Chemicals Allergic contact dermatitis Irritant contact dermatitis Metalworking fluids Solvents Oil acne Metal dust Mechanical trauma Sealants Epoxy resins Prepregs Primer Composite material Hardeners Heat cured Patch tested Subungual pulpitis 

References

  1. Aalto-Korte K, Pesonen M, Suuronen K (2015) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by epoxy chemicals: occupations, sensitizing products, and diagnosis. Contact Dermatitis 73:336–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayala F, Lembo G, Balato N et al (1990) The use of laboratory methods in contact dermatitis induced by composite materials. Contact Dermatitis 22:262–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck MH (1989) Experiences of contact dermatitis associated with phenol formaldehyde resins. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle J-M, Rycroft RJG, Sheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Björkner B (1992) Plastic materials. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Benezra C (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruze M (1988) Patch testing with a mixture of 2 phenol-formaldehyde resins. Contact Dermatitis 19:116–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruze M, Trulsson L, Bendsöe N (1992) Patch testing with ultrasonic bath extracts. Am J Contact Dermat 3:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruze M, Edenholm M, Engström K et al (1996) Occupational dermatoses in a Swedish aircraft plant. Contact Dermatitis 34:336–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Burrows D (1983) Adverse chromate reactions in the skin. In: Burrows D (ed) Chromium metabolism and toxicity. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  9. Burrows D, Fregert S, Campbell H et al (1984) Contact dermatitis from the epoxy resins tetraglycidyl-4,4′-methylene dianiline and O-diglycidyl phthalate in composite material. Contact Dermatitis 11:80–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Castelain P-Y, Com J, Castelain M (1992) Occupational dermatitis in the aircraft industry: 35 years of progress. Contact Dermatitis 27:311–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cronin E (1980) Metals. In: Cronin E (ed) Contact dermatitis. Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahlquist I, Fregert S (1979) Contact dermatitis from volatile epoxy hardeners and reactive diluents. Contact Dermatitis 5:406–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Eedy DJ (1996) Carbon-fibre-induced airborne irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 35:362–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hackett JP (1999) Allergic contact dermatitis in American aircraft manufacture. Am J Contact Dermat 10:157–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hafner J, Rüegger M, Kralicek P et al (1995) Airborne irritant contact dermatitis from metal dust adhering to semisynthetic working suits. Contact Dermatitis 32:285–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall AF (1944) Occupational contact dermatitis among aircraft workers. JAMA 125:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Handley J, Burrows D (1994) Dermatitis from hexavalent chromate in the accelerator of an epoxy sealant (PR1422) used in the aircraft industry. Contact Dermatitis 30:193–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jappe U, Geier J, Hausen BM (2005) Contact vitiligo following a strong patch test reaction to triglycidyl-p-aminophenol in an aircraft industry worker: case report and review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis 53:89–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Estlander T et al (2000) Airborne occupational allergic contact dermatitis from triglycidyl-p-aminophenol and tetraglycidyl-4,4′-methylene dianiline in preimpregnated epoxy products in the aircraft industry. Dermatology 201:29–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Khanna M, Sasseville D (2001) Occupational contact dermatitis to textile dyes in airline personnel. Am J Contact Dermat 12(4):208–210Google Scholar
  21. Lembo G, Balato N, Cusano F et al (1989) Contact dermatitis to epoxy resins in composite material. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJG, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, New York, pp 377–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mathias CGT (1987) Allergic contact dermatitis from a nonbisphenol A epoxy in a graphite fiber reinforced epoxy laminate. J Occup Med 29:754–755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pesonen M, Suuronen K, Jolanki R et al (2015) Occupational contact dermatitis caused by aniline epoxy resins in the aircraft industry. Contact Dermatitis 73:113–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pirilä V (1950) Thiocol as a frequent cause of dermatitis. Acta Allergol 3:319–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF Jr (eds) (1995) Fisher’s contact dermatitis, 4th edn. Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilkinson SM, Beck MH (1993) Allergic contact dermatitis from sealants containing polysulphide polymers (Thiocol®). Contact Dermatitis 29:273–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Occupational and Environmental DermatologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations