Improving Infant and Young Child Nutrition in a Highly Stunted Rural Community: A Practical Case Study from Guatemala

  • Boris Martinez
  • David Flood
  • Katia Cnop
  • Andrea Guzman
  • Peter RohloffEmail author
Living reference work entry


Stunting is a major public health concern because of its association with child mortality and morbidity and later adult economic and health. Despite Guatemala’s important contributions on child nutrition research, the indigenous Maya population in Guatemala has one of the highest stunting rates in the world. This chapter contextualizes the global problem of child stunting with a close look to Guatemala’s historical nutrition research and policy, followed by a description of a comprehensive nutrition programming model for highly stunted communities developed by the nongovernmental healthcare organization Wuqu’ Kawoq ∣ Maya Health Alliance and a single-community case study of the model implementation. The model includes both preventative and curative evidence-based interventions to target food security, environmental factors, access to health services, and caregiver education and empowerment. Frontline workers with cultural and linguistic competency deliver individualized education and nutrition assessments. Over a 2-year implementation of the approach in a Maya community, the overall prevalence of stunting under 5 declined 20% and the prevalence of severe stunting 35%. In this and other similar settings, holistic, primary care approaches to malnutrition can have significant impact on child health.


Stunting Diet quality Feeding practices Case study Guatemala Indigenous Food security Community-based nutrition Nongovernmental organization Primary care 

List of Abbreviations


Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance


Instituto Nacional de Estadística


Low- and Middle-Income Country


Wuqu’ Kawoq | Maya Health Alliance


Ministerio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social


Nongovernmental Organization


Expansion of Coverage Program


Plan de Pacto Hambre Cero


United States Agency for International Development


World Health Organization


Zero Hunger Plan


More than 150 million children younger than 5 years of age worldwide suffer from chronic malnutrition, or stunting (UNICEF 2016). Stunting results from a complex interplay of social, economic, environmental, and biological factors that lead to restricted linear growth (Reinhardt and Fanzo 2014). Stunting not only is a risk factor for early childhood morbidity and mortality (Black et al. 2013) but also confers deleterious long-term effects on cognitive development, adult health, and economic productivity (Hoddinott et al. 2008; Adair et al. 2013; Sawaya et al. 2003). Although the global prevalence of stunting has been declining since 1990, rates remain high in many low-and middle-income countries (LMIC) (Stevens et al. 2016; UNICEF 2016). While less than 50% of all children under 5 years of age live in LMICs, 98% of the world’s stunted children live in these countries (Black et al. 2013; WHO 2016).

This chapter focuses on child nutrition in Guatemala, a Central American LMIC with a population of 16 million people. With a prevalence of stunting of 46% in children under 5 years of age, Guatemala has the highest stunting rate in the Western Hemisphere (MSPAS 2017; USAID 2016). Additionally, national-level data tend to obscure the disproportional burden of stunting throughout the country. The poorest sectors of Guatemala’s population, who are largely rural indigenous Maya, have much higher stunting rates, making them the most stunted group in the world according to some estimates (Black et al. 2013). Such health indicators are deeply intertwined with the longstanding economic, social, and political marginalization of Maya communities in Guatemala, which includes state-sponsored genocide during a civil war from 1960 to 1996 (Oglesby and Nelson 2016).

We first briefly review the history of nutrition research in Guatemala before leading to a synthesis of the current state of the country’s nutrition politics and policy. The historical overview showcases how Guatemala has served as a global nutrition research laboratory from the 1940s up to the present day. Among other significant work, we review how the Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP) Cohort Study and its follow-up iterations, which are still ongoing, have had a remarkable influence on the scientific understanding of child malnutrition and on global nutrition policy. We then describe how findings from the INCAP study and related research have been put into practice within the contemporary Guatemalan health system under the “First Thousand Days” framework. Underlying this analysis is the uncomfortable reality that although Guatemala has served as an extremely productive nutrition research setting, stunting rates in the country persist at extraordinarily high levels.

After our discussion of nutrition research and policy in Guatemala, we provide a practical overview of a model of nutrition programming for highly stunted Maya communities developed by our nongovernmental organization, Wuqu’ Kawoq | Maya Health Alliance (MHA). We then turn to a single-community case study of the implementation of this model to demonstrate its impact on child health. We conclude by reflecting on our experiences and discussing future research and programmatic priorities with regards to nutrition in Guatemala.

Stunting in Guatemala

Guatemala has an estimated population of 16.5 million people. The country has one of the largest indigenous populations in Latin America, with nearly 50% of the population self-identifying as indigenous Maya (Chary and Rohloff 2015; MSPAS 2017). Around the world, there are profound inequalities in health indicators and access to healthcare services for indigenous populations (Anderson et al. 2016; Gracey and King 2009). In Guatemala, stunting is a significant example of these disparities, as 58% of indigenous Guatemalan children are stunted as opposed to 34% of nonindigenous children (MSPAS 2017). As mentioned above, according to some analyses, the poorest quintile of Guatemalans (mostly rural and indigenous) are the most stunted population in the world (Black et al. 2013).

Stunting is a proxy for many significant short-term and long-term health risks. In the short term, stunted children are more likely to face illness, die in childhood, and have early cognitive and neurodevelopmental delays (Black 2017). In the long term, these children tend to not reach their full academic, economic, and health potential. They have decreased school performance, worse economic prospects, and face increased reproductive risks as adults (Adair et al. 2013; Dewey and Begum 2011; Hoddinott et al. 2008). Additionally, an emerging literature suggests that children who are chronically malnourished have higher risks of chronic noncommunicable diseases as adults, such as obesity, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes (DeBoer et al. 2012).

Guatemala’s Historical Nutrition Research Overview

Since the late 1940s, Guatemala has made important contributions to the global study of childhood malnutrition. At that time, research conducted by INCAP in Maya communities demonstrated how the provision of malnutrition preventative services and improvements in basic community living conditions could have greater impacts on children’s nutritional status than curative services alone (Mata 1978; Scrimshaw et al. 1969). Findings from these earlier studies formed the basis for the conceptualization of the INCAP Oriente Study, a nutrition trial that began as a supplementary feeding program in eastern Guatemala villages from 1969 to 1977 (Martorell et al. 1995; Stein et al. 2008). The Oriente Study is one of the most famous and oft-cited longitudinal nutrition studies in the world. Longitudinal follow-up from the original cohort and subsequent generations have generated strong evidence on the longer-term positive effects of early nutrition supplementation (Martorell 2010). In addition, the study clearly documented for the first time that child malnutrition in Guatemala is primarily a problem of endemic stunting (low height-for-age) rather than acute malnutrition (wasting, low weight-for-height) or underweight (low weight-for-age) (Ruel et al. 1995) and that exposure to chronic infectious disease and low-quality diets were the principal causes of children’s impaired growth (Martorell 2010). The latest wave of data collection in the Oriente Study is currently being carried out, and using detailed biologic samples, researchers hypothesize that better child nutrition will be protective against adult obesity and related noncommunicable chronic diseases (Stein 2014). An important final note is that although prior INCAP research had included the study of child nutrition in indigenous Maya communities, the Oriente Study included only Spanish-speaking (i.e., nonindigenous) communities due to logistical barriers and the unavailability of unbiased cognitive tools for this population (Flood 2015).

Guatemala’s Historical Nutrition Policy Overview

The INCAP Oriente Study demonstrated that growth faltering of stunted children in Guatemala occurs early, usually in the first year of life (Ruel et al. 1995). Nevertheless, historically much of Guatemala’s official nutrition policy remained focused on school feeding programs (Nutrinet 2009). However, since 2006, nutrition policy in Guatemala has finally seen important policy shifts toward more preventive and comprehensive interventions targeting the early childhood period. These national changes derive from advocacy by major international donors and policy makers, including the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the World Food Program, in favor of early childhood programs in “the first 1,000 days of life” window (FANTA 2010). In 2012, the government of President Otto Pérez Molina made the prevention of early childhood malnutrition a major priority, disseminating a new multilevel strategic plan called “Plan Hambre Cero” (Zero Hunger Plan, ZHP), derived from the global “Thousand Days Initiative” framework (Thousand Days 2014). ZHP was launched with the goal to reduce stunting rates by 10% by the end of 2015 from a baseline rate of nearly 50% (PPHO 2012). The ZHP strategy emphasized global evidence-based interventions such as the distribution of micronutrient powders, deworming, provision of supplementary fortified flour blends, growth monitoring, and maternal education.

The ZHP was designed to function within the government’s existing rural health system known as the “Programa de Extension de Cobertura” (Expansion of Coverage Program, PEC). PEC was established in the late 1990s, after the conclusion of the Guatemalan civil war, as a system to provide basic preventative health services for rural underserved indigenous populations. However, after allegations of institutional corruption within PEC, the government dismantled the program in early 2015 (Avila et al. 2015; Espina 2015). Uncertainty and political instability followed, and basic healthcare services in rural areas were suspended for months. A government corruption scandal led to the impeachment and resignation of the Guatemalan president, vice president, and several other major government officials; among the allegations were that public health funds had been diverted to private coffers (Galicia 2016). The rural system has subsequently been reconstituted, but this back and forth political drama simply underscores the fact that rural health programs remain incredibly underfunded and extremely limited in the provision of quality services.

An important, probably unintended side effect of implementing the Thousand Days framework in Guatemala has been an inflexible prioritization by nutrition and government stakeholders on the prevention of stunting in children under 2, limiting consideration of other pediatric health issues including strategies to improve outcomes in the very large number of Guatemalan children who are already stunted. While prevention of stunting is highly cost-effective, this does not indicate that there is no social or economic benefit to policies that also include catch-up growth in already stunted children, or in children older than 2 years. Indeed, historical data from the INCAP Oriente Study in Guatemala, as well as high-quality evidence from other countries, show that catch-up growth is possible and significant (Prentice et al. 2013; Roberts and Stein 2017; Stein et al. 2010).

Finally, the emphasis within Guatemala’s rural health system of utilizing frontline health workers to deliver narrow, technical nutrition interventions to Guatemalan infants and children reflects a final point of departure from more holistic community health models pioneered in Guatemala many years ago. For example, in 1962, Dr. Carroll Behrhorst founded the Behrhorst Development Foundation, which attempted to address the underlying factors causing poverty and poor health among the rural Guatemalan population through community participation, empowerment, and integrated development programs. Central to the Behrhorst model were rural Maya community health workers trained to deliver curative and preventative medicine in their communities (Horton 1987). A case study of the Foundation was included in Kenneth Newell’s 1975 book Health by the People (Newell and WHO 1975), which became highly influential during the primary health care movement in the lead-up to the Declaration of Alma Ata in 1978. In 1980s, the Foundation was severely impacted by the Guatemalan civil war, and after Behrhorst’s death in 1990, decreases in international funding lead the Foundation to shift away from its original mission of community-based development (Maupin 2015).

Community-Based Nutrition Programming

Based on the foregoing analysis, we have been working for the last decade with rural Maya communities to reformulate community-based nutrition programming in a way that reclaims a focus on primary, holistic care; includes both preventative strategies and catch-up growth interventions for stunted children; and has a strong focus on caregiver education and empowerment. In this section, we describe the formative nutrition research and nutrition delivery model that we have developed, finally, moving to a detailed case study of its implementation in one rural community. The goal is to provide practical insights into comprehensive nutrition program design, as well as the potential impact of the approach, which will be of use to other practitioners around the world.

All of this work has been conducted within the institutional umbrella of Wuqu’ Kawoq | Maya Health Alliance (MHA). MHA is a primary care organization, founded by ourselves and others in 2007, to provide culturally and linguistically nuanced services to rural Mayan-speaking populations. Over the years, MHA has grown into a full-service organization in central Guatemala delivering services in 20 rural highland communities to more than 20,000 patients per year. MHA also performs ethnographic and health services research relevant to Maya populations. With regards to child nutrition, MHA operates a large nutrition delivery program and has conducted numerous research studies, including clinical trials, on nutrition in this setting.

Formative Nutrition Research

Formative nutrition research in the years leading up to our nutrition program design has focused on ground-level factors that we have observed in our programmatic work to contribute to improved nutrition outcomes. Themes have included gender roles, food insecurity, breastfeeding, feeding practices , and community perceptions of stunting.

Importantly, a better understanding of the timing and onset of growth faltering has been a major concern. As also previously demonstrated in the INCAP Oriente Study (Ruel et al. 1995), we have noted that growth faltering in Maya communities starts usually at 6 months of age, corresponding to the time of transition to complementary foods, and negatively correlates with the household financial stability and availability of high-quality infant foods (Chary et al. 2011). For many indigenous families with young infants who are experiencing growth faltering, meeting food-based dietary recommendations is difficult due to the lack of economic resources for purchasing nutritious foods and the wide availability of alternative low-cost processed foods (Brown et al. 2014; Chary et al. 2013).

We have also investigated how poor child feeding indicators exist even in rural communities devoted to agricultural production, largely due to the pressures to enter the export agricultural market. For example, a recent study we conducted in a rural Maya community where most families dedicated themselves to agricultural production revealed that less than 3% of the children under the age of five met World Health Organization (WHO) standards for dietary diversity and meal frequency. In this community, most harvested produce was directed to exportation with minimal local consumption available for children (Webb et al. 2016). This is not really a matter of negligence so much as the fact that when the prevalence of child stunting is extremely high, its deleterious impacts on child health become normalized and are not easily perceived by caregivers (Brown et al. 2014; Chary et al. 2013). Finally, discrimination against Maya mothers by the formal health system exacerbates the impact of stunting by discouraging Maya caregivers from seeking out primary healthcare services (Chary et al. 2011).

Finally, we have explored strategies to overcome barriers to suboptimal breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices among Maya caregivers. For example, we have shown how mothers’ relationships with their male partners and mothers-in-law contribute to feeding practices. Male partners often control all household funds, and mothers-in-law often make most food purchasing and preparation decisions. These family-level factors have a significant impact on child health and must be taken into consideration when designing programs (Brown et al. 2014; Chary et al. 2011).

Nutrition Program Model

Based on the results of this formative research, MHA has worked to design and adapt nutrition programs to meet the needs and sensibilities of clients and families in rural Maya communities. This work began in 2009 at a very small scale, serving 2 communities and approximately 70 children and their families. The program has continued to grow steadily; in 2016, it covered 20 rural communities and 1500 children under 2 years in three provinces (Chimaltenango, Sololá, Suchitepéquez).

The program model is designed to decrease the community prevalence of stunting through both universal preventative and targeted recuperative (catch-up growth) services. A basic package of preventative services is offered to all children under 5 years of age. This package is evidence-based (Bhutta et al. 2008) and in line with the Guatemalan government’s own recommendations under the ZHP initiative (PPHO 2012), including growth monitoring, basic nutrition education for caregivers, micronutrient supplementation, and deworming. Notably, the provision of services for children older than 2 years of age is a departure from the thousand days framework (which recommends services up to 2 years as a policy priority) and is based on our experiences over the last 10 years that communities and families strongly prefer this programatic decision and that the more inclusive approach improves community buy-in. It is also in part a response to the evidence that catch-up growth is possible in stunted children older than 2 years (Prentice et al. 2013; Roberts and Stein 2017; Stein et al. 2010). In addition to this preventative community-based package, a more intensive 6-month catch-up growth intervention is targeted to already-stunted children younger than 2 years of age; this package is described in more detail below. All services are free-of-charge.

The program operates with indigenous auxiliary nurses and community health workers (CHW) as front-line workers, to whom we further henceforth as “nutrition technicians.” Nutrition technicians are bilingual in Mayan and Spanish languages and use standardized clinical algorithms for the screening, management, and treatment of stunting, as well as for delivering nutrition education to the children’s caregivers. In Fig. 1, nutrition technicians from MHA perform children’s growth monitoring activities in rural Maya communities.
Fig. 1

Growth monitoring . Nutrition technicians perform children’s growth monitoring activities of weight (a) and length (b) in rural Maya communities during home visits

Nutrition technicians are supervised and supported by physicians and nutritionists, who perform monthly evaluation meetings. The nutritionists and physicians are on call for emergencies, and they evaluate children not responding as expected to the nutrition interventions. Staff physicians perform further medical evaluations for complex consultations or for primary care issues beyond the nutrition technicians’ scope of practice. Integrating nutrition programming into this more comprehensive primary care safety net is, we feel, critical. Despite the ubiquitous nature of stunting in Guatemala, other treatable pediatric diseases such as inborn errors of metabolism or endocrine disorders can go undiagnosed without the input of expert practitioners (King et al. 2016). Care by nutrition technicians is primarily delivered by home visits, an approach which enables health care provision to patients who live far away from health care facilities.

The program’s clinical protocols were derived from national, regional, and international recommendations for the prevention and treatment of childhood malnutrition (Bhutta et al. 2008; Dewey 2003; MSPAS 2010). In addition to preventative services mentioned above, which are provided to all children, stunted children under 2 years receive additional services. These include monthly home visits for more intensive, individualized nutrition assessment and counselling and food supplementation with a family food ration to offset food insecurity and to supplement the child’s diet with specific quality calories and nutrients (particularly, protein) often lacking in the diet (FANTA 2010). Children who are wasted in addition to stunted also receive therapeutic milk formula (F-100) (Ashworth et al. 2003) or ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTF) (Ciliberto et al. 2005) as indicated by a staff nutritionist. As shown in Fig. 2, these services all together form a comprehensive primary care approach to child malnutrition, with key interventions designed to address four key drivers of malnutrition: food security , environmental health, health services, and caregiver’s empowerment and education. To promote interinstitutional collaboration, individual nutrition technicians establish community-level partnerships with community leadership councils and local government healthcare staff.
Fig. 2

Key drivers of child nutrition . Theoretical overview of a comprehensive primary care-focused model for treating child malnutrition in rural Guatemala developed and implemented in several rural-Maya communities by Maya Health Alliance

During home visits with stunted children, nutrition technicians perform individualized dietary counseling focused on two primary indicators – dietary diversity (number of food groups per day) and meal frequency (number of meals per day). To guide this interaction, they conduct a 24 hour dietary recall at each visit, based on the WHO’s published template (WHO 2008). Through systematic collection of dietary recall data, nutrition technicians can identify deficiencies in each child’s diet and guide the primary caregiver through improvement strategies. Conducting this work in the home facilitates confidentiality. Over time, caregivers gradually feel more comfortable asking questions and sharing their experiences, concerns, and expectations. Finally, the home setting allows nutrition technicians to learn about each child’s living situation, food accessibility, economic resources and family dynamics, and tailor interventions accordingly (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Nutrition counseling Nutrition technician guides children’s caregivers through child nutrition improvement strategies during a home visit

In addition to preventative and recuperative child-focused activities, the model concentrates heavy investments in caregiver education; all primary caregivers in the community with children younger than 5 years, as well as expectant mothers and other important family caregivers (such as grandmothers), are invited to participate in a weekly nutritional education program facilitated by the nutrition technician for five consecutive weeks. These sessions aim to empower the caregivers by increasing their ability to select a variety of high-quality foods for home consumption and diversifying their food preparation methods. Nutrition education meetings are conducted in a highly participatory manner, with usually 8–10 participants. As outlined in Table 1, we use our understanding of the local context of poverty and food insecurity to provide relevant and practical tips for improving child diets, placing emphasis on utilizing potential “hidden family resources” such as shifting household expenses away from junk food purchases (Brown et al. 2014). These meetings also always include meal preparation activities (Fig. 4), using only locally available food and resources.
Table 1

Themes covered during group educational meetings . Themes covered in the nutrition curriculum used for group meetings are shown. Caregivers and other participants attend five weekly sessions. Each session last 2–3 hours and ends with a food preparation activity

Session Theme


1. The importance of good nutrition

Nutrition during pregnancy. Food classification in terms of micro- and macronutrients (vitamin A and C, iron, folic acid, protein, carbohydrates, fats). Hygiene and water purification

2. Breastfeeding and its values

Frequency and duration of breastfeeding episodes. Helpful posture and problem-solving techniques for quality breastfeeding. Common breastfeeding myths

3. Complementary feeding

Adequate frequency, quantity, quality, and consistency of complementary feeding. Strategies for improving diet diversity with inexpensive locally available fresh foods

4. Childhood malnutrition

Acute and chronic malnutrition, anemia. Causes, consequences, and solutions. Review of the value of micro and macronutrients for an adequate growth

5. Complete review

General review of each previous class. Time for additional questions and sharing of feedback. Closing ceremony

Fig. 4

Meal preparation activities . Nutrition technician performs a food preparation demonstration for children’s caregivers, during these activities special focus is placed on the use of locally available foods and the use of possible hidden-resources

Finally, because the nutrition model exists within a larger institutional primary care framework, nutrition technicians can connect other members of the family with other health care needs to potential medical resources. This is most important for female caregivers, who can access a full range of reproductive health services – including comprehensive reproductive education, cancer and sexual transmitted diseases’ screening and treatment, and family planning – which are important elements for caregiver empowerment (Fig. 2).

Case Study

To provide additional programmatic details on the implementation of comprehensive, community-based nutrition programming, we present here a brief case study of the implementation of a nutrition program in one rural Maya community, Xik’injuyu’, located in the western Guatemala piedmont (Table 2). MHA began building a primary care program – primarily focused on child nutrition and reproductive health services – in collaboration with the community in 2014. The community consists of approximately 360 families, most of K’iche’ Maya descent. Potable water services are scarce. Most male heads-of-households work as seasonal agricultural day laborers on rubber, banana, or coffee plantations, while most female residents are homemakers. Underemployment is common and around 70% of families live in poverty (less than $2 USD/day).
Table 2

Characteristics of Xik’injuyu’ case study community prior to beginning nutrition programming. Basic demographic and nutrition-related characteristics are shown for the case study community. These characteristics are typical of the region and help to illustrate the stressors and risk factors of populations at high risk of stunting

Characteristics (n = 167)


Household size (mean ± SD)

3.99 ± 1.93

Maternal illiteracy (%)


Adequate child diet (%)


Child nutrition status (%)


 Severely stunted



Key: n sample size, SD standard deviation

When beginning our collaboration with the community, families reported to us how they struggled with access to nutritious food, especially due to droughts, increases in food prices, and periods of unemployment, and more than 60% reported family-level food insecurity. Very few families (less than one-third) own land, and so producing their own food is an unavailable strategy. Many families told us that they resorted to purchasing low cost processed foods at local stores, as these were less costly and more readily available than high-quality fresh foods. Because of these stressors, prior to initiating joint efforts in the community, the overall prevalence of stunting (height-for-age Z score [HAZ] < −2) based on WHO Child Growth Standards (De Onis et al. 2006) was 52%, and a full 22% of children were severely stunted (HAZ < −3).

Over the last 2 years implementing the primary care approach described in this chapter, we have seen important improvements in rates of malnutrition. As shown in Fig. 5a, the rate of overall stunting in children under 5 has declined from 52% to 42%, nearly a 20% improvement. The rate of severe stunting has declined even more rapidly, from 22% to 14%, a roughly 35% improvement (Fig. 5b).
Fig. 5

(a) Change in stunting prevalence and (b) severe stunting prevalence over 2 years in Xik’injuyu’. Longitudinal change in the prevalence of stunting (a) and severe stunting (b) for children younger than 5 years in the community of Xik’injuyu’ are shown. Note the decrease of both since the implementation of the Wuqu’ Kawoq | Maya Health Alliance nutrition program in 2014

Final Reflexions

In this chapter, we contextualize the global problem of child stunting with a close look at its history and dynamics in rural Guatemala, which suffers from some of the highest rates of stunting in the world. In the first section, we offer a review of nutrition research in Guatemala and a synthesis of the government’s nutrition policy, which only recently has officially recognized the country’s staggering stunting problem. However, national nutrition programs and policies have suffered from intermittent and ineffective deployment, a narrow focus on stunting prevention to the exclusion of treatment, and failure to address the root causes of stunting in a holistic fashion.

In the second part of this chapter, we offer a detailed, practical description of work in rural Guatemala with Wuqu’ Kawoq ∣ Maya Health Alliance, a nonprofit healthcare organization, to deploy evidence-based interventions for stunting within a comprehensive primary care model. Various premises of the model will be generalizable and useful to practitioners in other settings. First, well-supported nutrition technicians, who speak indigenous Maya languages, can provide high value nutritional care and are highly motivated to carry out time-consuming, high-contact activities such as home visits and education sessions. This is in line with the overall consensus in the literature that community-based interventions led by nurses and CHWs are critical for improving health outcomes (Lassi et al. 2016). Second, nutrition technicians can adopt and successfully utilize advanced interview techniques, such as 24-h dietary recalls, to better customize and individualize the interventions they provide to children and caregivers. Finally, by emphasizing home visits and respectful caregiver education, nutrition programming can promote an inclusive, collaborative environment, where caregivers feel comfortable sharing their experiences without fear of punishment or stigma, thereby learning about nutrition and building a network of trust and support.

In the final part of the chapter, we share additional details from a single rural community where we recently initiated a primary care nutrition program. In this program, over a space of 2 years, the overall prevalence of stunting declined 20% and the prevalence of severe stunting 35%. These findings are typical of our experiences in multiple Maya communities over the last 10 years. First, they reinforce that holistic, primary care approaches to malnutrition can have a significant impact on child health in these settings. At the same time, they also underscore that no existing stunting intervention is able to completely eradicate the problem. This fact is ultimately motivating, as it serves as a call for ongoing research, increased advocacy, and sustained commitments from healthcare organizations, civil society, governments, and policymakers together until every child’s and every family’s nutritional future is made secure.

Policies and Protocols

In this chapter, we have described practical details of how to implement culturally and linguistically sensitive, comprehensive nutrition programs for rural areas of Guatemala. Many of these details are also readily applicable to other settings and contexts. Here we highlight three of these:
  1. 1.

    Frontline nutrition workers should be cognizant of the culture and language of their clients. Administrators from both government and civil society groups should prioritize hiring practices that ensure these linguistic and cultural competencies. Monitoring for program quality should include provision of services in the client’s preferred language.

  2. 2.

    Individualized education can improve caregiver engagement and child feeding practices. Implementers should consider focusing effort on training frontline workers to provide personalized interventions. A key area is dietary recalls to better focus assessments of dietary quality. Existing materials developed by the World Health Organization (WHO 2008) can easily be adapted.

  3. 3.

    In areas of high stunting prevalence, programming should include both preventative and (if resources allow) recuperative interventions. Home-based visits by nutrition technicians are an excellent strategy for implementing recuperative interventions, which can include more intensive feeding or education strategies.


Dictionary of Terms

Dietary diversity

A term for dietary quality from the perspective of the regular consumption of a diversity of food items. Can be easily assessed on a dietary recall by counting the number of distinct food groups consumed in a given time period. The World Health Organization has published useful guidelines detailing methods for assessing food group consumption in young children (WHO 2008).

Meal frequency

An important indicator of overall caloric adequacy in a child’s diet, which can be assessed on a 24-h dietary recall. Each meal should consist of solid food items, not liquids. The World Health Organization has published detailed guidelines for the required number of meals based on the child’s age (WHO 2008).


Also known as chronic malnutrition. Defined as a height-for-age Z-score of less than −2, compared to World Health Organization Child Growth Standards (De Onis et al. 2006). Severe stunting is defined as a Z-score of less than −3.


Defined as a weight-for-age Z-score of less than −2, compared to World Health Organization Child Growth Standards (De Onis et al. 2006). Severe underweight defined as a Z-score of less than −3.


Also known as acute malnutrition. Defined as a weight-for-length or weight-for-height Z-score of less than −2, compared to World Health Organization Child Growth Standards (De Onis et al. 2006). Severe acute malnutrition is defined as a Z-score of less than −3.

Summary Points

  • This chapter focuses on stunting, one of most important pediatric growth disorders in the world.

  • Stunting causes early morbidity and mortality in childhood, as well as developmental delay, reduced school achievement, and loss of adult economic potential.

  • The indigenous Maya population in Guatemala has one of the highest rates of stunting in the world.

  • Although Guatemala has been an important source of child nutrition research, this has not translated into improved stunting outcomes for rural indigenous communities.

  • Interventions to target stunting should take a comprehensive approach, targeting food security, environmental factors, access to health services, and caregiver education and empowerment.

  • Frontline workers, such as nurses and community health workers, can effectively deliver nutrition interventions, especially if they have cultural and linguistic competency.

  • Individualized education and nutrition assessments are an important part of nutrition programming, because they improve caregiver empowerment and the effectiveness of interventions.

  • In high stunting prevalence communities, programs should ideally have both preventative and curative interventions.


  1. Adair LS, Fall CH, Osmond C, Stein AD, Martorell R, Ramirez-Zea M et al (2013) Associations of linear growth and relative weight gain during early life with adult health and human capital in countries of low and middle income: findings from five birth cohort studies. Lancet 382:525–534CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson I, Robson B, Connolly M, Al-Yaman F, Bjertness E, King A et al (2016) Indigenous and tribal peoples’ health (the Lancet–Lowitja Institute Global Collaboration): a population study. Lancet 388:131–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashworth A, Khanum S, Jackson A, Schofield C (2003) Guidelines for the inpatient treatment of severely malnourished children. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  4. Avila C, Bright R, Gutierrez JC, Hoadley H, Manuel C, Romero N et al (2015) Guatemala health system assessment. Health Finance & Governance Project, Abt Associates Inc, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, Black RE, Cousens S, Dewey K, Giugliani E et al (2008) What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival. Lancet 371:417–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Black RE (2017) Patterns of growth in early childhood and infectious disease and nutritional determinants. In: Complementary feeding: building the foundations for a healthy life. Karger Publishers, Basel, pp 63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, De Onis M et al (2013) Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 382:427–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown K, Henretty N, Chary A, Webb MF, Wehr H, Moore J et al (2014) Mixed-methods study identifies key strategies for improving infant and young child feeding practices in a highly stunted rural indigenous population in Guatemala. Matern Child Nutr 12:262–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chary A, Rohloff P (eds) (2015) Privatization and the new medical pluralism: shifting healthcare landscapes in Maya Guatemala. Lexington Books, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  10. Chary A, Dasgupta S, Messmer S, Rohloff PJ (2011) Breastfeeding, subjugation, and empowerment in rural Guatemala. In: Walks M, McPherson N (eds) Mothering: anthropological perspectives. Demeter Press, BradfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Chary A, Messmer S, Sorenson E, Henretty N, Dasgupta S, Rohloff P (2013) The normalization of childhood disease: an ethnographic study of child malnutrition in rural Guatemala. Hum Organ 72:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ciliberto MA, Sandige H, Ndekha MJ, Ashorn P, Briend A, Ciliberto HM et al (2005) Comparison of home-based therapy with ready-to-use therapeutic food with standard therapy in the treatment of malnourished Malawian children: a controlled, clinical effectiveness trial. Am J Clin Nutr 81:864–870PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. De Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Garza C, Yang H (2006) Comparison of the World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards and the National Center for Health Statistics/WHO international growth reference: implications for child health programmes. Public Health Nutr 9:942–947PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. DeBoer MD, Lima AA, Oría RB, Scharf RJ, Moore SR, Luna MA et al (2012) Early childhood growth failure and the developmental origins of adult disease: do enteric infections and malnutrition increase risk for the metabolic syndrome? Nutr Res 70:642–653Google Scholar
  15. Dewey K (2003) Guiding principles for complementary feeding of the breastfed child. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  16. Dewey KG, Begum K (2011) Long-term consequences of stunting in early life. Matern Child Nutr 7:5–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Espina C (2015) PDH califica crisis de salud como situación sin precedentes en el país. In: El Periódico. Accessed 20 Feb 2017
  18. Flood D (2015) Reflections on the INCAP Oriente Longitudinal Study of early life nutrition: an interview with Aryeh Stein. Global Health Hub. Accessed 11 Feb 2017
  19. Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project (FANTA) (2010) TRM-01: preventing malnutrition in children under 2 approach (PM2A): a food-assisted approach. Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance II Project, FHI 360, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Galicia N (2016) Errores y corrupción hacen caer a Otto Pérez Molina. In: Prensa Libre. Accessed 25 Mar 2017
  21. Gracey M, King M (2009) Indigenous health part 1: determinants and disease patterns. Lancet 374:65–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoddinott J, Maluccio JA, Behrman JR, Flores R, Martorell R (2008) Effect of a nutrition intervention during early childhood on economic productivity in Guatemalan adults. Lancet 371:411–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Horton JC (1987) The Behrhorst Foundation at 25 years. A report from Chimaltenango, Guatemala. N Engl J Med 316:1666–1669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. King N, Alvizures R, García P, Wessel A, Rohloff P (2016) Argininemia as a cause of severe chronic stunting in a low-resource developing country setting: a case report. BMC Pediatr 16(142):1–4Google Scholar
  25. Lassi ZS, Kumar R, Bhutta ZA (2016) Community-based care to improve maternal, newborn, and child health. In: Black RE, Laxminarayan R, Temmerman M et al (eds) Reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health: disease control priorities. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 263–284Google Scholar
  26. Martorell R (2010) Physical growth and development of the malnourished child: contributions from 50 years of research at INCAP. Food Nutr Bull 31:68–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Martorell R, Habicht JP, Rivera JA (1995) History and design of the INCAP Longitudinal Study (1969–77) and its follow-up. J Nutr 125(Suppl 4):1027–1041Google Scholar
  28. Mata LJ (1978) The children of Santa Maria Cauqué: a prospective field study of health and growth. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  29. Maupin J (2015) Strategic alliances: the shifting motivations for NGO collaboration with government programs. In: Chary A, Rohloff P (eds) Privatization and the new medical pluralism: shifting healthcare landscapes in Maya Guatemala. Lexington Books, Lanham, pp 3–18Google Scholar
  30. Ministerio de Salud Publica y Asistencia Social (MSPAS) (2010) Normas de Atención en Salud Integral. MSPAS, GuatemalaGoogle Scholar
  31. Ministerio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social (MSPAS), Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE), ICF International (2017) Encuesta Nacional de Salud Materno Infantil 2014–2015. MSPAS/INE/ICF, GuatemalaGoogle Scholar
  32. Newell KW (ed) (1975) Health by the people. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  33. Nutrinet (2009) Historia de la alimentación escolar en Guatemala. Accessed 02 Mar 2017
  34. Oglesby E, Nelson DM (2016) Guatemala’s genocide trial and the nexus of racism and counterinsurgency. J Genocide Res 18:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Plan de Pacto Hambre Cero (PPHO) (2012) Gobierno de Guatemala. Accessed 02 Mar 2017
  36. Prentice AM, Ward KA, Goldberg GR, Jarjou LM, Moore SE, Fulford AJ et al (2013) Critical windows for nutritional interventions against stunting. Am J Clin Nutr 97:911–918CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Reinhardt K, Fanzo J (2014) Addressing chronic malnutrition through multi-sectoral, sustainable approaches: a review of the causes and consequences. Front Nutr 1:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roberts JL, Stein AD (2017) The impact of nutritional interventions beyond the first 2 years of life on linear growth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Nutr 8:323–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ruel MT, Rivera J, Habicht JP (1995) Length screens better than weight in stunted populations. J Nutr 125:1222–1228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sawaya AL, Martins P, Hoffman D, Roberts SB (2003) The link between childhood undernutrition and risk of chronic diseases in adulthood: a case study of Brazil. Nutr Res 61:168–175Google Scholar
  41. Scrimshaw NS, Béhar M, Guzmán MA, Gordon JE (1969) Nutrition and infection field study in Guatemalan villages, 1959–1964: IX. An evaluation of medical, social, and public health benefits, with suggestions for future field study. Arch Environ Health 18:51–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Stein A (2014) Early childhood nutrition and adult metabolomic and cardiometabolic profiles. Accessed 10 Mar 2017
  43. Stein AD, Melgar P, Hoddinott J, Martorell R (2008) Cohort profile: the Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP) nutrition trial cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 37:716–720CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Stein AD, Wang M, Martorell R, Norris SA, Adair LS, Bas I et al (2010) Growth patterns in early childhood and final attained stature: data from five birth cohorts from low-and middle-income countries. Am J Hum Biol 22:353–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Stevens GA, Finucane MM, Paciorek CJ (2016) Levels and trends in low height-for-age. In: Black RE, Laxminarayan R, Temmerman M et al (eds) Reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health: disease control priorities. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 85–93Google Scholar
  46. Thousand Days (2014) 1,000 days. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  47. UNICEF (2016) Joint child malnutrition estimates – 2016 edition. UNICEF DATA. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
  48. United States Agency for International Development (USAID) (2016) Guatemala: nutrition profile. Last updated 8 Feb 2016. Accessed 10 Dec 2016
  49. Webb MF, Chary AN, De Vries TT, Davis S, Dykstra M, Flood D et al (2016) Exploring mechanisms of food insecurity in indigenous agricultural communities in Guatemala: a mixed methods study. BMC Nutr 2(55):1–11Google Scholar
  50. World Health Organization (2008) Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices: part 1: definitions: conclusions of a consensus meeting held 6–8 November 2007 in Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  51. World Health Organization (2016) Joint child malnutrition estimates – levels and trends. Accessed 23 Jan 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boris Martinez
    • 1
  • David Flood
    • 1
  • Katia Cnop
    • 1
  • Andrea Guzman
    • 1
  • Peter Rohloff
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Wuqu’ KawoqSantiago SacatepéquezGuatemala
  2. 2.Division of Global Health EquityBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations