Heritage Language Speakers in the University Classroom, Doing Research

Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)


This chapter describes the design and goals of a first-year undergraduate course that introduces students to research in heritage languages. The course illustrates a means of increasing pedagogical activity related to heritage languages at the university level. The benefits to students, faculty, and the community of engaging students in disciplinary practices in the field of sociolinguistics are noted. The integration of pedagogy and research is articulated around five goals: to train students in aspects of research including fieldwork and analysis, to develop information literacy, to provide opportunities for transactional writing, to connect research and teaching, and to encourage students, especially students who are speakers of minority languages, to get involved in research. While the course has been offered in the context of a large research-oriented university that encourages undergraduate involvement in research, resources are offered so that aspects of the course may be adapted to situations which share only some features of the context in which it was developed.


Pedagogical approaches Student researchers Information literacy Transactional writing Authentic disciplinary practices 


  1. Bialystok, E., Craik, F., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon Task. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng, W., Warren, M., & Xun-Feng, X. (2003). The language learner as language researcher: Putting corpus linguistics on the timetable. System, 31(2), 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cummins, J., Bismilla, V., Chow, P., Cohen, S., Giampapa, F., Leoni, L., Sandhu, P., & Sastri, P. (2005). Affirming identity in multilingual classrooms. Educational Leadership, 63(1), 38.Google Scholar
  4. Discovery Program Advisory Committee and Center for Teaching Excellence, University of New Hampshire. (2006). Designing and teaching an inquiry 444 seminar: Approaches and strategies [Internet]. [Updated 2010 November 12; cited 2016 June 26]. Available from http://www.slideserve.com/Leo/designing-and-teaching-an-inquiry-444-seminar
  5. Elmesky, R., & Tobin, K. (2005). Expanding our understandings of urban science education by expanding the roles of students as researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 807–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Genesee, F. (1994). Educating second language children: The whole child, the whole curriculum, the whole community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Giles, H., Bourhis, R., & Taylor, D. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In H. Giles (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 307–348). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  8. Goodrich, R. (2012). Life or death: What a language needs to survive [Internet]. [Posted 2012 Nov 8; cited 24 Feb 2016. Available at http://vocabulary-software-review.toptenreviews.com/life-or-death-what-a-language-needs-to-survive.html
  9. Grafstein, A. (2002). A discipline-based approach to information literacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(4), 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrison, B. (2000). Passing on the language: Heritage language diversity in Canada. Canadian Social Trends, 58, 14 (Catalogue No. 11-008-XPE, 58) Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  11. Huber, M., & Morreale, S. (Eds.). (2002). Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education and The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  12. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  13. Labov, W. (2001). Applying our knowledge of African American English to the problem of raising reading levels in inner-city schools. In S. Lanehart (Ed.), African American English: State of the art (pp. 299–318). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  14. Labov, W., & Baker, B. (2010). What is a reading error? Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 735–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lenski, S. (2004). Improving writing: Strategies, assessments, resources. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt.Google Scholar
  16. Nagy, N. (2011). A multilingual corpus to explore geographic variation. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 43(1–2), 65–84.Google Scholar
  17. Nagy, N. (2015). A sociolinguistic view of null subjects and VOT in Toronto heritage languages. Lingua, 164B, 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nagy, N. (2016). Heritage languages as new dialects. In M. Côté, R. Knooihuizen, & J. Nerbonne (Eds.), The future of dialects: Selected papers from methods in dialectology (Vol. XV, pp. 15–34). Berlin: Language Science. doi:10.17169/langsci.b81.81.Google Scholar
  19. Nagy, N., & Meyerhoff, M. (2008). The social lives of linguistics. In M. Meyerhoff & N. Nagy (Eds.), Social lives in language – Sociolinguistics and multilingual speech communities (pp. 1–17). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oberst, J. (2011). Heidegger on language and death: The intrinsic connection in human existence. A&C Black.Google Scholar
  21. Polinsky, M., & Kagan, O. (2007). Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 368–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ragland, R. (2008). Using scholarly research in course redesign: Teaching to engage students with authentic disciplinary practices. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning [Internet], 2(2). Art. 4. [Updated 2013 Oct 21; cited 2016 Jun 26]. Available from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol2/iss2/4
  23. Statistics Canada. (2011). Census of population as a home language or mother tongue [Internet]. [Updated 2013 Feb 13; cited 2016 June 27]. Available from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/demo12c-eng.htm
  24. Statistics Canada. (2011). 2011 Census Highlights: Factsheet 6. [Updated 2013 July 23; cited 2016 June 27] Available from: http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/economy/demographics/census/cenhi11-6.html
  25. Walker, J. (2010). Variation in linguistic systems. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A., & Sloetjes, H. (2006). ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of LREC 2006, Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.Google Scholar
  27. Wolfram, W., Reaser, J., & Vaughn, C. (2008). Operationalizing linguistic gratuity: From principle to practice. Language and Linguistics Compass [Internet], 2(6), 1109–1134. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2008.00092.x [cited 2016 Jun 27].Google Scholar
  28. Xiao, Y. (2006). Heritage learners in the Chinese language classroom: Home background. Heritage Language Journal, 4(1). [Cited 2016 Jun 27]. Available from http://international.ucla.edu
  29. Yang, J. (2016). Multiculturalism and the status of Heritage Languages in USA and Canada. Paper presented at The Future of Community Languages in Canada: The Case of Modern Greek, The Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linguistics DepartmentUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations