Advertisement

Structural Fingerprints of Development at the Intersection of Evo-Devo and the Fossil Record

  • Gar W. Rothwell
  • Alexandru M. F. Tomescu
Living reference work entry

Abstract

The plant body preserves diagnostic structural features that develop as the result of specific regulatory genes and growth regulators. When recognized in extinct species, those features serve as structural fingerprints for the regulatory programs by which they were produced. We review the contributions of the fossil record to understanding the evolution of plant development in a temporal (geologic time) and a structural perspective (morphology, anatomy), and we highlight major topics in plant evolution in which integration of data from fossil and living plants has yielded significant resolution. Up to the present, the most ubiquitous growth regulator, auxin, has been documented as essential to the regulation of secondary growth and wood formation not only in seed plants, but also in several other major groups in which living species are no longer characterized by secondary growth. Additional fingerprints of growth regulation reveal the occurrence of gravitropic responses in fossils that extend back in time 400 million years and explain the evolution of equisetacean reproductive morphologies, living and extinct, by the interaction of modular regulatory programs. Still other fingerprints document parallel evolution of stem/leaf organography in several clades of living plants (e.g., ferns, Equisetum, and seed plants) and of substantial rooting systems that facilitated evolution of giant trees in extinct lycophytes and seed plants. Future application of techniques for identifying and interpreting the significance of structural fingerprints to a much broader spectrum of developmental processes holds tremendous potential for the paleontological record to substantially illuminate and enhance understanding of systematics and evolution within the context of plant development.

Keywords

Anatomy Auxin Body plan Developmental regulation Fossil Leaf Morphology Paleo-evo-devo Phytomer Rhizomorph Root Secondary growth Strobilus Structural fingerprint 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Jean Galtier, Patricia Gensel, Alexander Hetherington, Jinzhuang Xue, Patrick Herendeen, and Kelly Matsunaga, who kindly provided images for illustrations. Nevin Cullen, Kyla Garten, and Dennis Walker are thanked for preparing some of the sections. Space constraints precluded us from fully referencing this work, and we apologize to the many authors whose publications are not included.

References

  1. Boyce CK, Knoll AH (2002) Evolution of developmental potential and the multiple independent origins of leaves in Paleozoic vascular plants. Paleobiology 28:70–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Floyd SK, Bowman JL (2010) Gene expression patterns in seed plant shoot meristems and leaves: homoplasy or homology? J Plant Res 123:43–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Frankenberg JM, Eggert DA (1969) Petrified Stigmaria from North America: part I. Stigmaria ficoides, the underground portions of Lepidodendraceae. Palaeontogr B 128:1–47Google Scholar
  4. Gerrienne P, Gensel PG (2016) New data about anatomy, branching, and inferred growth patterns in the early Devonian plant Armoricaphyton chateaupannense, Montjean-sur-Loire, France. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 224:38–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harrison CJ (2016) Auxin transport in the evolution of branching forms. New Phytol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14333
  6. Hetherington AJ, Dubrovski JG, Dolan L (2016a) Unique cellular organization in the oldest root meristem. Curr Biol 26:1629–1633CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Hetherington AJ, Berry CM, Dolan L (2016b) Networks of highly branched stigmarian rootlets developed on the first giant trees. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:6695–6700CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Jennings JR (1975) Protostigmaria, a new plant organ from the lower Mississippian of Virginia. Palaeontology 18:19–24Google Scholar
  9. Kenrick P, Crane PR (1997) The origin and early diversification of land plants. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Langdale JA (2008) Evolution of developmental mechanisms in plants. Curr Opin Genet Dev 18:368–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Matsunaga KKS, Tomescu AMF (2017) An organismal concept for Sengelia radicans gen. et sp. nov. – morphology and natural history of an early Devonian lycophyte. Ann Bot 117:1097–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Matsunaga KKS, Cullen NP, Tomescu AMF (2017) Vascularization of the Selaginella rhizophore: anatomical fingerprints of polar auxin transport with implications for the deep fossil record. New Phytol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14478
  13. Niklas KJ (1997) The evolutionary biology of plants. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Pryer KM, Schneider H, Smith AR et al (2001) Horsetails and ferns are a monophyletic group and the closest living relatives to seed plants. Nature 409:618–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rothwell GW, Erwin DM (1985) The rhizomorph apex of Paurodendron: implications for homologies among the rooting organs of Lycopsida. Am J Bot 72:86–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rothwell GW, Nixon K (2006) How does the inclusion of fossil data change our conclusions about the phylogenetic history of euphyllophytes? Int J Plant Sci 167:737–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rothwell GW, Sanders H, Wyatt SE et al (2008) A fossil record for growth regulation: the role of auxin in wood evolution. Ann Mo Bot Gard 95:121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rothwell GW, Wyatt SE, Tomescu AMF (2014) Plant evolution at the interface of paleontology and developmental biology: an organism-centered paradigm. Am J Bot 101:899–913CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sanders H, Rothwell GW, Wyatt SE (2009) Key morphological alterations in the evolution of leaves. Int J Plant Sci 170:860–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Spencer ART, Mapes G, Hilton J et al (2015) Middle Jurassic evidence for the origin of Cupressaceae: a paleobotanical context for the roles of regulatory genetics and development in the evolution of conifer seed cones. Am J Bot 102:942–961CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Stein WE (1993) Modeling the evolution of stelar architecture in vascular plants. Int J Plant Sci 154:229–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stein WE, Boyer JS (2006) Evolution of land plant architecture: beyond the telome theory. Paleobiology 32:450–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stewart WN (1947) A comparative study of stigmarian appendages and Isoetes roots. Am J Bot 34:315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor TN, Kerp H, Hass H (2005) Life history biology of early land plants: deciphering the gametophyte phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:5892–5897CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Taylor WA, Strother PK, Vecoli M et al (2017) Wall ultrastructure of the oldest embryophytic spores: implications for early land plant evolution. Rev Micropaleontol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmic.2016.12.002
  26. Tomescu AMF (2009) Megaphylls, microphylls and the evolution of leaf development. Trends Plant Sci 14:5–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tomescu AMF (2011) The sporophytes of seed-free vascular plants – major vegetative developmental features and molecular genetic pathways. In: Fernandez H, Kumar A, Revilla MA (eds) Working with ferns. Issues and applications. Springer, New York, pp 67–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tomescu AMF, Wyatt SE, Hasebe M et al (2014) Early evolution of the vascular plant body plan – the missing mechanisms. Curr Opin Plant Biol 17:126–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tomescu AMF, Escapa IH, Rothwell GW et al (2017) Developmental programmes in the evolution of Equisetum reproductive morphology: a hierarchical modularity hypothesis. Ann Bot 119:489–505CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Vasco A, Smalls TL, Graham SW et al (2016) Challenging the paradigms of leaf evolution: Class III HD-Zips in ferns and lycophytes. New Phytol 212:745–758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Botany and Plant PathologyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental and Plant BiologyOhio UniversityAthensUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesHumboldt State UniversityArcataUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Charles P. Scutt
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Reproduction et Développement des PlantesEcole Normale Supérieure de LyonLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations