Skip to main content

Bureaucracy and Politicians: Dynamics and Challenges

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance
  • 448 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Box R (1999) Running government like a business implications for public administration theory. Am Rev of Public Adm 29(1):19–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carino LV (1991) Regime changes, the bureaucracy, and political development. In: Farazmand A (ed) Handbook of comparative and development public administration. Mercel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand A (1997) Bureaucrats and politicians in comparative perspective. In: Farazmand A (ed) Modern systems of government. SAGE Publications, Inc., London, pp ix–xvii

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady F (1984) Public administration: A comparative perspective. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber JD, Shipan CR (2011) Politics, Delegation, and Bureaucracy. In: Goodin RE (ed) The Oxford handbook of political science

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon S, Tang S (1998) Reinventing government: a critique from institutional perspective. Int J Public Adm 21(10):1449–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson-Crotty S (2009) Politics and management: revisiting the politics/administration dichotomy in order to build a more complete understanding of public management. Public Perform Manag Rev 32:610–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1991) A framework for institutional analysis. Working paper. Indiana University, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole LJ (1987) Doctrines and Developments: Separation of Powers, the Politics Administration Dichotomy, and the Rise of the Administrative State, Public Administration Review 47:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters BG, Pierre J (2001) Politicians, bureaucrats and administrative reform. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouban L (2007) Public management and politics: senior bureaucrats in France. Public Adm 85(2):473–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svara JH (1999) Complementarity of politics and administration as a legitimate alternative to the dichotomy model. Adm Soc 30:676–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svara JH (2001) The myth of the dichotomy: Complementarity of politics and administration in the past and future of public administration. Public Adm Rev 61:176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigoda-Gadot E, Mizrahi S (2008) Public sector management and the democratic ethos, a longitudinal study of key relationships in Israel. J Public Adm Res Theory 18:79–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1947) The theory of social and economic organization (trans). Henderson and Parsons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson W (1887) The study of administration. Polit Sci Q 2(2):197–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood D, Waterman RW (1991) The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy. Am Polit Sci Rev 85(3):801–828

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pranab Kumar Panday .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Panday, P.K. (2017). Bureaucracy and Politicians: Dynamics and Challenges. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3293-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3293-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics