State and Administrative Reforms in Turkey and Their Implications

  • Hüseyin GülEmail author
  • Hakan M. KirişEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history




Turkey, with a population of 78.5 million, has undergone profound changes especially over the last two decades. Turkey will have a population of 85 million in 2023 according to TUİK’s (2016) projections. Around 70–75 % population is made up of the people of Turkish ethnicity but includes people from various ethnic, cultural, and religious backgrounds (i.e., Kurds, Armenians, Greeks, and Jews). This diversity has been used to justify a strong centralist state and administrative structure in Turkey, which, in turn, has been considered as an efficient method to build nation state and achieve national unity and administrative integrity, modernization, and economic development.

Turkish democracy is a relatively developed parliamentarian democracy with a system of free elections and several competing parties. Turkey ranks the 72nd out of 188 countries in the Human Development Index among the high human development countries up from the...


Central Government Public Administration Local Administration Popular Vote Administrative Reform 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Aydın S, Keyman EF (2004) European integration and the transformation of Turkish democracy (EU-Turkey working papers no. 2/August). The Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  2. Çelenk AA (2009) Europeanization and administrative reform: the case of Turkey. Mediterr Polit 14(1):41–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit) (2015) Democracy Index 2015 – Democracy in an age of anxiety. Economic Intelligence Unit. Retrieved on 23 Mar 2016 from
  4. European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) (2014) Press release issued by the Registrar of the Court: ECHR 355. ECHR, Strasbourg. Retrieved on 11 Mar 2016 from file:///C:/Users/samsung/Downloads/003-4952135-6065927.pdfGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferlie E (2012) Concluding discussion: paradigms and instruments of public management reform – the question of agency. In: Christine T, Ferlie E, Dent M (eds) Leadership in the public sector: promises and pitfalls. Routledge, New York, pp 237–251Google Scholar
  6. Frederickson HG (1997) The spirit of public administration. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  7. Friedman G (2009) Gelecek 100 yıl – 21. yüzyıl için öngörüler. Pegasus Yayınları, İstanbulGoogle Scholar
  8. Gül H, Kiriş HM (2015) Democratic governance reforms in Turkey and their implications. In: Dawoody AR (ed) Public administration and policy in the Middle East. Springer, New York, pp 25–59Google Scholar
  9. Heper M, Keyman EF (1998) Double-faced state: political patronage and the consolidation of democracy in Turkey. Middle Eastern Stud 34(4):259–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. İçişleri Bakanlığı (2016) Türkiye mülki idare bölümleri envanteri. Retrieved on 29 Feb 2016 from
  11. Öniş Z (2004) Turgut Özal and his economic legacy: Turkish neo-liberalism in critical perspective. Middle Eastern Stud 40(4):113–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Öniş Z (2006) Globalization and party transformation. Turkey’s Justice and Development Party in perspective. In: Burnell P (ed) Globalising democracy: party politics in emerging democracies. Routledge, London, pp 122–140Google Scholar
  13. Özbudun E (2007) Democratization reforms in Turkey, 1993–2004. Turk Stud 8(2):179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sallan Gül S (2006) Sosyal devlet bitti, yaşasın piyasa! e-Babil Yayınları, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  15. Sözen S (2012) Recent administrative reforms in Turkey: a preliminary assessment. Int J Bus Soc Sci 3(9):168–173Google Scholar
  16. Turkish Statistical Institute (TUİK) (2016) Demographic projections for Turkey. Retrieved on 5 Mar 2016 from
  17. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2015) Human development report 2015: work for human development. UNDP. Retrieved on 23 Mar 2016 from

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and Public AdministrationSüleyman Demirel UniversityIspartaTurkey