Accountability

  • Paolo RicciEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2321-1

Synonyms

Definition

The term “accountability” implies the duty to act in a responsible way and to be accountable to others for one’s actions, in order to maintain effective and logical links between planning, deciding, action, and verification.

The term is complex and chameleonic (Sinclair 1995; Mulgan 2000), and it evokes at the same time: a principle, a duty, a behavior, a system, a process, and a series of operating tools.

The term – particularly familiar in Western societies – comes, in a theoretical sense, from political science studies and should be considered a fundamental cornerstone of democratic systems (Shah 2010; Borowiak 2011).

In any case, it represents the need to convey how financial and nonfinancial resources are used, the correctness of those who operate in a management capacity, the adequacy and conformity of actions taken compared to preexisting objectives, and the results reached over time. This is achieved by highlighting...

Keywords

Public Administration Public Accountability Public Entity Accounting Principle Political Accountability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bebbington J, Unerman J, O’Dwyer B (2014) Sustainability accounting and accountability. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  2. Borowiak CT (2011) Accountability and democracy. The pitfalls and promise of popular control. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bovens M (2009) Public accountability. In: Ferlie E, Lynn LE, Pollitt C (eds) The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan J (2011) The ethics of voting. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  5. Cho CH, Laine M, Roberts RW, Rodrigue M (2015) Organized hyprocricy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Account Org Soc 40:78–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Esposito P, Ricci P (2015) How to turn public (dis)value into new public value? Evidence from Italy. Public Money Manag 35(3):227–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flinders M (2012) Defending politics: why democracy matters in the 21st century. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freeman ER (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, MarshfieldGoogle Scholar
  9. Gray A, Jenkins B (1993) Codes of accountability in the new public sector. Account Audit Account J 6(3):52–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hood C (1995) The new public management in the 1980s: variations on a theme. Account Org Soc 20(2/3):93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mair P (2013) Ruling the void: the hollowing of Western democracy. Verso, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Messner M (2009) The limits of accountability. Account Org Soc 34:918–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moore MH (1995) Creating public value. Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Mulgan R (2000) Accountability: an ever-expanding concept? Public Adm 78(3):555–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Olson O, Humphrey C, Guthrie J (2001) Caught in an evaluatory trap: a dilemma for public service under NPFM. Eur Account Rev 10(3):505–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ostrom V, Ostrom E (1977) Public goods and public choices. In: Savas E (ed) Alternatives for delivering public services. Toward improved performance. Westview, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  17. Pollitt C (1993) Managerialism and public services. The Anglo-American experience. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Pollitt C, Bouckeart G (2000) Public management reform: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Putnam RD (2002) Democracies in flux: the evolution of social capital in contemporary society. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roberts J (2009) No one is perfect: the limits of transparency and the ethic for “intelligent” accountability. Account Organ Soc 34:957–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Romzek BS, Dubnick MJ (1987) Accountability in the public sector: lessons from the challenger tragedy. Public Manag Rev 47(3):227–238Google Scholar
  22. Saves S (2000) Privatization and public-private partnership. Chatham House Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Shah H (2010) Accountability: has it been hollowed out in modern state? J Polit Stud 18(77–):77–91Google Scholar
  24. Sinclair A (1995) The chameleon of accountability: forms and discourses. Account Org Soc 20(2–3):303–326Google Scholar
  25. Voorberg WH, Bekkers VJJM, Tummers LG (2015) A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Manag Rev 17(9):1333–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Law, Economy, Management and Quantitative Methods (DEMM)University of SannioBeneventoItaly