Financial Health and Distress in Local Government

Living reference work entry



Financial health of a local government refers to its ability to be solvent, both in the short and long run, and at the same time to maintain a certain minimum level of services for its community; the related concept of fiscal distress is associated with the ability of a local government to meet short- and long-term financial obligations and avoid State takeover or bankruptcy.


Especially in recent years, local governments (LGs) across the world, and municipal governments in particular, have confronted varying degrees of financial distress mainly as consequence of severe economic crises. LG’s financial distress is a complex and multidimensional process. The causes behind jurisdictions that fall into financial distress are varied, and no simple linear relationship exists. Falling revenues, central State and regional grant cuts, investment losses to pension funds, and...


Financial Distress Accounting Information City Government Financial Flow Financial Health 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Clark TN (1977) Fiscal management of American cities: funds flow indicators. J Account Res 15(Supplement):54–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Downing RG (1991) Urban county fiscal stress: a survey of public officials’ perceptions and government experiences. Urban Aff Rev 27(2):314–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ernst & Young (2012) Overview and Comparison of Public Accounting and Auditing Practices in the 27 EU Member States: Prepared for Eurostat. Bruxelles: Ernst & Young.Google Scholar
  4. Kloha P, Weissert CS, Kleine R (2005) Developing and testing a composite model to predict local fiscal distress. Public Adm Rev 65(3):313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Levine H, Justice JB, Scorsone EA (2013) Handbook of local government fiscal health. Jones & Bartlett Learning, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. López BB, Alijarde BI, Montesinos VJ (2003) Utilidad de la información contable en los rating de dueda pública. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 32(117):501–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Padovani E, Scorsone EA (2011) Measuring financial health of local governments: a comparative framework. In: Yearbook of Swiss Administrative Sciences. Swiss Society of Administrative Sciences, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  8. Petersen J (1974) The rating game. The Twentieth-Century Fund, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Peterson G (1976) Finance. In: Gorham W, Galzer N (eds) The urban predicament. The Urban Institute, Washington, DC, pp 35–118Google Scholar
  10. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2014) Collection of Information Related to the Potential Impact, including Costs, of Implementing Accrual Accounting in the Public Sector and Technical Analysis of the Suitability of Individual IPSAS Standards, prepared for Eurostat 2013/S 107–182395. Brussels, Belgium: PricewaterhouseCoopers.Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Bologna, Department of ManagementBolognaItaly