Management Strategies and Budgetary Politics

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1337-1
  • 648 Downloads

Synonyms

Introduction

Management strategies are a central feature of budgetary politics. Yet no single strategy guides the deployment of public funds. Public agencies often adopt management strategies to align or fit with their economic and political environments, but there are risks. Strategies can work in certain contexts, but fail to achieve results in others. For example, the management approaches well suited to an era of incremental, year-by-year expansion of government funding do not work well when agencies face the need for deep spending cutbacks. Simply put, the engine driving agency budgets cannot easily be thrown into reverse. In short, there is no one best way to manage government agencies and budgets.

While the budget literature largely focuses on strategies and tactics employed to acquire resources, less is known about how management strategies are adapted to different...

Keywords

Management Strategy Organize Crime Incremental Growth Revenue Budget Expanding Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Behn R (1980) Leadership for cut-back management: the use of corporate strategy. Public Adm Rev 40(6):613–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caiden N, Wildavsky A (1980) Planning and budgeting in poor countries. Transaction, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  3. Daft RL (2000) Management, 5th edn. The Dryden Press, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  4. Gates RM (2014) Duty: memoirs of a Secretary at War. Alfred A. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Levine CH (1978) Organizational decline and cutback management. Public Adm Rev 38(4):316–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rubin IS (2014) The politics of public budgeting: getting and spending, borrowing and balancing. Sage CQ Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  7. Savas ES (2005) Privatization in the city: successes, failures, lessons. CQ Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Stein RM (2003) Politics of revenue and spending policies. In: Pelissero JP (ed) Cities, politics, and policy: a comparative analysis. CQ Press, Washington, DC, pp 217–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wildavsky A (1975) Budgeting: a comparative theory of budgetary processes. Little, Brown and Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Wilson JQ (1989) Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kutztown University of PennsylvaniaKutztownUSA