Skip to main content

Big Data Robotics and Rights

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

Is the activity of software neutral? Could the set of algorithms and big data which help the framework of an artificial intelligence in recognizing, classifying, or elaborating data be considered truly objective? As a matter of fact, data are never objective. Statistical models modify reality as they represent it. Furthermore, we are living in the era of learning machines: Robots are everyday more intelligent, useful, and independent. As they are implied in a long list of activities, we need to know which rules they do have to respect. Most of all, we need to establish who, and in what terms, could be responsible for their faults. That is why the European Union is elaborating a set of principles and rules on robots and artificial intelligence: New technologies have a great potential for the benefit of humanity, provided that ethics and law do not give up on ruling them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Amato Mangiameli, Agata C. 2017a. Tecno-regolazione e diritto. Brevi note su limiti e differenze. Il diritto dell’informazione e dell’informatica 2: 146–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017b. Tecno-diritto e tecno-regolazione. Spunti di riflessione. Rivista di filosofia del diritto. Numero speciale: 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amato Mangiameli, Agata C., e Maria Novella Campagnoli. 2020. Strategie digitali. #diritto_educazione_tecnologie, 45–74. Torino: Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amato Mangiameli, Agata C., e Guido Saraceni. 2019. I reati informatici. Elementi di teoria generale e principali fattispecie criminose. Torino: Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berners-Lee, Tim. 2014. Internet compie 25 anni, l’inventore Berners-Lee: ‘Ora al web serve una Costituzione’. Quotidiano.net, 12 marzo.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017a. Three challenges for the web, according to its inventor. Web Foundation, March 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017b. Tim Berners-Lee on the future of the web: ‘The system is failing’. The Guardian, November 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, Dominique. 2015. A quoi rêvent les algorithms. Nos vies à l’heure des big data. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caronia, Antonio. 1991. Il cyborg: saggio sull’uomo artificiale. Roma-Napoli: Theoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan_Meets_Onco_Mouse. Feminism and Technoscience. Londra: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, Luciano. 2017. La quarta rivoluzione: Come l'infosfera sta trasformando il mondo. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, Cathy. 2016. Weapons of math destruction. How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Washington, DC: Crown Bookstore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquale, Frank. 2015. The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, Isabelle. 2013. Une autre science est possible! Manifeste pour un ralentissement des sciences. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Allucquère Rosane. 1995. The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talia, Domenico. 2018. La società calcolabile e i big data. Algoritmi e persone nel mondo digitale. Soveria Mannelli (CZ): Rubettino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veruggio, Gianmarco, and Fiorella Operto. 2008. Roboethics: Social and ethical implications. In Handbook of robotics, ed. Bruno Siciliano and Oussama Khatib, 1499–1524. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weizenbaum, Joseph. 1984. Computer power and human reason. From judgement to calculation. London: Penguin UK.

    Google Scholar 

Essential Reading

  • Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (A8-0005/2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on a framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies (A9-0186/2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on a civil liability regime for artificial intelligence (A9-0178/2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 on intellectual property rights for the development of artificial intelligence technologies (A9-1976/2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Amato Mangiameli, A.C. (2021). Big Data Robotics and Rights. In: Cremades, J., Hermida, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Contemporary Constitutionalism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31739-7_122-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31739-7_122-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31739-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31739-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics