Running Shoes: Injury Protection and Performance Enhancement

Living reference work entry

Abstract

In addition to being possibly the most frequently performed sport in the world, running is associated with a high incidence of overuse injuries. Running shoes can modify the load imposed on the runner’s body by changing the interface between the biological system and the running surface. The key shoe design features that can affect biomechanical loading are the compression and bending stiffness of the midsole and the medial support elements. These features can also affect the energy consumption of the runner, which is key to running performance. In general, no footwear design feature is able to reduce the load in the entire leg. Instead, what can be achieved is a shift of the loading from distal to more proximal regions of the limb, or vice versa, often by shifting the point of force application of the ground reaction force. Distance-running performance is strongly diminished by increases in the mass of footwear; however, this can be negated to some extent when the additional mass is due to the presence of cushioning materials, which can reduce impact costs in heel–toe runners. Future research in this field needs to identify more clearly the biomechanical risk factors associated with running-related injuries. Based on this, recommendations with respect to individually optimal footwear can be made with greater confidence. This will be essential for successful implementation of customized footwear within the running-shoe market.

Keywords

Running mechanics Footwear biomechanics Sports technology Running-related injuries Overuse injuries Barefoot running Impact cushioning Midsole bending stiffness Sports performance Running economy 

References

  1. Bramble DM, Lieberman DE (2004) Endurance running and the evolution of homo. Nature 432(7015):345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carmody RN, Wrangham RW (2009) The energetic significance of cooking. J Hum Evol 57(4):379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carrier DR, Kapoor AK, Kimura T, Nickels MK, Satwanti SEC, So JK, Trinkaus E (1984) The energetic paradox of human running and hominid evolution [and comments and reply]. Curr Anthropol 25(4):483–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavagna G, Kaneko M (1977) Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running. J Physiol 268(2):467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cavagna G, Saibene F, Margaria R (1964) Mechanical work in running. J Appl Physiol 19(2):249–256Google Scholar
  6. Cavanagh PR, Kram R (1985) The efficiency of human movement--a statement of the problem. Med Sci Sports Exerc 17(3):304–308Google Scholar
  7. De Wit B, De Clercq D, Aerts P (2000) Biomechanical analysis of the stance phase during barefoot and shod running. J Biomech 33(3):269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferris DP, Louie M, Farley CT (1998) Running in the real world: adjusting leg stiffness for different surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265(1400):989–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frederick EC (1984) Physiological and ergonomics factors in running shoe design. Appl Ergon 15(4):281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hardin EC, van den Bogert AJ, Hamill J (2004) Kinematic adaptations during running: effects of footwear, surface, and duration. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36(5):838–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herculano-Houzel S (2016) The human advantage: a new understanding of how our brain became remarkable. MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hintermann B, Nigg B, Sommer C, Cole G (1994) Transfer of movement between calcaneus and tibia in vitro. Clin Biomech 9(6):349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoogkamer W, Kipp S, Spiering BA, Kram R (2016) Altered running economy directly translates to altered distance-running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 48(11):2175–2180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kluitenberg B, van Middelkoop M, Diercks R, van der Worp H (2015) What are the differences in injury proportions between different populations of runners? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 45(8):1143–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lieberman DE, Bramble DM (2007) The evolution of marathon running. Sports Med 37(4–5):288–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lieberman DE, Venkadesan M, Werbel WA, Daoud AI, D’Andrea S, Davis IS, Mang’Eni RO, Pitsiladis Y (2010) Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature 463(7280):531–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McDougall C (2009) Born to run. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. New York CityGoogle Scholar
  18. Nielsen RO, Rønnow L, Rasmussen S, Lind M (2014) A prospective study on time to recovery in 254 injured novice runners. PLoS One 9(6):e99877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nigg BM (2010) Biomechanics of sport shoes. University of Calgary, CalgaryGoogle Scholar
  20. Nigg BM, Herzog W (2007) Biomechanics of the Musculo-skeletal system. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  21. Nigg BM, Liu W (1999) The effect of muscle stiffness and damping on simulated impact force peaks during running. J Biomech 32(8):849–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nigg B, Baltich J, Hoerzer S, Enders H (2015) Running shoes and running injuries: mythbusting and a proposal for two new paradigms:‘preferred movement path’and ‘comfort filter’. Br J Sports Med 49(20):1290–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Perry S, Lafortune M (1995) Influences of inversion/eversion of the foot upon impact loading during locomotion. Clin Biomech 10(5):253–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robertson DGE, Caldwell GE, Hamill J, Kamen G, Whittlesey SN (2013) Research methods in biomechanics, 2nd edn. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  25. Roy J, Stefanyshyn DJ (2006) Shoe midsole longitudinal bending stiffness and running economy, joint energy, and EMG. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38(3):562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saragiotto BT, Yamato TP, Junior LCH, Rainbow MJ, Davis IS, Lopes AD (2014) What are the main risk factors for running-related injuries? Sports Med 44(8):1153–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saunders PU, Pyne DB, Telford RD, Hawley JA (2004) Reliability and variability of running economy in elite distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36(11):1972–1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shorten M, Mientjes MI (2011) The ‘heel impact’ force peak during running is neither ‘heel’ nor ‘impact’ and does not quantify shoe cushioning effects. Food Sci 3(1):41–58Google Scholar
  29. Stacoff A, Denoth J, Kaelin X, Stuessi E (1988) Running injuries and shoe construction: some possible relationships. Int J Sport Biomech 4(4):342–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stearne SM, McDonald KA, Alderson JA, North I, Oxnard CE, Rubenson J (2016) The foot’s arch and the energetics of human locomotion. Sci Report 6:19403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stefanyshyn DJ, Wannop JW (2016) The influence of forefoot bending stiffness of footwear on athletic injury and performance. Food Sci 8(2):1–13Google Scholar
  32. Trinkaus E (2005) Anatomical evidence for the antiquity of human footwear use. J Archaeol Sci 32(10):1515–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tung KD, Franz JR, Kram R (2014) A test of the metabolic cost of cushioning hypothesis during unshod and shod running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 46(2):324–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Gent RN, Siem D, van Middelkoop M, van Os AG, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Koes BW (2007) Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 41(8):469–480. discussion 480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Willwacher S, König M, Potthast W, Brüggemann G-P (2013) Does specific footwear facilitate energy storage and return at the metatarsophalangeal joint in running. J Appl Biomech 29(5):583–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Willwacher S, König M, Braunstein B, Goldmann J-P, Brüggemann G-P (2014a) The gearing function of running shoe longitudinal bending stiffness. Gait Posture 40(3):386–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Willwacher S, Regniet L, Mira Fischer K, Oberländer KD, Brüggemanna G-P (2014b) The effect of shoes, surface conditions and sex on leg geometry at touchdown in habitually shod runners. Food Sci 6(3):129–138Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Biomechanics and OrthopedicsGerman Sport UniversityCologneGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Functional DiagnosticsCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations