The Neurobiology of Personal Transformation

  • Corey Stanford
  • George Stanford
Living reference work entry


This chapter describes personal transformation as both the context for and product of choosing growth-promoting responses to challenges in life over self-protecting responses. The disposition to make this choice sets a trajectory of personal transformation throughout life which is experienced as the development of innate potential and general well-being.

The growth and protection modes for life engagement are so holistic that they can be measured concurrently at behavioral, mind, and neurobiological levels. This chapter describes them at all three levels while focusing on the contributions of neurobiological research. Neurobiological patterns serve as reliable markers for the thoughts and actions that distinguish growth-promoting from self-protecting responses to challenges.

Most day-to-day life engagement is carried out automatically through habitual patterns of thoughts and actions that require little reflective thought and personal change. This chapter explains how challenges are delineated as opportunities for transformation by the degree to which they drive the need for significant personal change. The need for personal change to address challenges sets up an emotional conflict which is resolved through personal transformation.

Meeting challenges that provoke personal transformation requires reflective interpretations of situations and evaluations of oneself and intentional choices of growth responses. Reflective interpretations and intentional choices offset habitual thoughts and actions. They are both described in some detail, and practical skills and strategies are provided for their application to challenges.


Neuroscience Neurobiological markers Self-transformation Growth mindset Self-efficacy Reflective interpretation Self-examination Parasympathetic dominance 


  1. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benson H, Proctor W (2011) Relaxation revolution: the science and genetics of mind body healing. Scribner, A Division of Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Dweck C (2006) Mindset: the new psychology of success. Ballantine Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Epel E, Daubenmier J, Moskowitz J (2009) Can meditation slow rate of cellular aging? Cognitive stress, mindfulness, and telomeres. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1172:34–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hajcak G, Nieuwenhuis S (2006) Reappraisal modulates the electrocortical response to unpleasant pictures. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 6(4):291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heller A, Reekum C, Schaefer S et al (2013) Sustained striatal activity predicts eudaimonic well-being and cortisol output. Psychol Sci 24:2191–2200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones L, Hills P, Dick K et al (2016) Cognitive mechanisms associated with auditory sensory gating. Brain Cogn 102:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Judge T, Bono J (2001) Relationship of core self-evaluations traits – self esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability – with job satisfaction and job performance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 86(1):80–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Keltner D, Marsh J, Smith J (2010) The compassionate instinct: the science of human goodness. The Greater Good Science Center, W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Koltko-Rivera M (2006) Rediscovering the later version of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Rev Gen Psychol 10(4):302–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lazarus R, Folkman S (1984) Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company, New York, pp 141–178Google Scholar
  12. Learner S, Li Y, Valdesolo P et al (2015) Emotion and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 66:799–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lipton B (2015) The biology of belief: unleashing the power of consciousness, matter & miracles, 10th Anniversary edn. Hay House, Chapter 6Google Scholar
  14. Marget S, Faraguna U, Nelson A et al (2011) Sleep and waking modulate spine turnover in the adolescent mouse cortex. Nat Neurosci 14:1418–1420. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maurer R (2014) One small step can change your life: the Kaizen way. Workman Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. McCraty R, Zayas M (2014) Cardiac coherence, self-regulation, autonomic stability, and psychosocial well-being. Front Psychol 5:1090. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Poulin M, Brown S, Dillard A et al (2010) Giving to others and the association between stress and mortality. Am J Public Health 103(9):1649–1655. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rohr C, Villringer A, Solms-Baruth C et al (2016) Human brain mapping. In: The neural networks of subjectively evaluated emotional conflicts. Available via Wiley Online Library.
  19. Saunders B, Milyavskaya M, Inzlicht M (2015) Variation in cognitive control as emotion regulation. Psychol Inq 26(1):108–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schwartz S (1994) Journal of social issues. In: Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Available via Wiley Online Library.
  21. Seeley W, Menon V, Schatzberg A et al (2007) Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci 27(9):2349–2356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Seligman M (2006) Learned optimism: how to change your mind and your life. Vintage Books, A Division of Random House, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Snyder CR (1994) Psychology of hope: you can get there from here. The Free Press, A Division of Simon & Schuster Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Stanford G, Stanford-Cusask M, Stanford C (2016) Emotional well-being: from science to practice. Balboa Press, A Division of Hay House, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  25. Stapel D, Blanton H (2004) From seeing to being: subliminal social comparisons affect implicit and explicit self-evaluations. J Pers Soc Psychol 87(4):468–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sutin A (2008) When the “I” looks at the “Me”: autobiographical memory, visual perspective, and the self. Conscious Cogn 17(4):1386–1397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thompson LY, Snyder CR, Hoffman L et al (2005) Dispositional forgiveness of self, others, and situations. J Pers 73:313–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Travis F (2014) We create our reality – hacking consciousness at Stanford University.
  29. Zak P (2007) Empathy and oxytocin lead to greater generosity. Science Dialy.
  30. Zysset S, Muller K, Lohmann G et al (2001) Color-word matching stroop task separating interference and response conflict. Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stanford Consulting, LLCFayettevilleUSA
  2. 2.Thriving in LifeSpringdaleUSA

Personalised recommendations