Skip to main content

Relative Autonomy Continuum

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 110 Accesses

Synonyms

Amount of felt self-determination; Degree of internalization; Perceived locus of causality

Definition

A theoretical sequence which orders many different types of motivation into a single continuum.

Introduction

The “relative autonomy continuum” (RAC) is a foundational concept within self-determination theory (SDT), in particular within SDT’s “organismic integration” mini-theory (Deci and Ryan 1990). SDT postulates that all motivated behaviors can be located on an internalization continuum ranging from very little felt autonomy at one extreme to very much felt autonomy at the other extreme. According to the theory, autonomy is first and foremost a characteristic of experience. When people feel autonomous, they feel they are standing fully behind their own actions, with a corresponding “internal perceived locus of causality” for their own behavior. In contrast, when people feel nonautonomous, they feel controlled, forced, and pressured in their behavior, with an “external...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1990). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. D. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, Perspectives on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 237–288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 734–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2017). Self-Determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., Osin, E. N., Gordeeva, T. O., Suchkov, D., & Sychev, O. (2017). Evaluating the dimensionality of Self-determination theory’s relative autonomy continuum. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kennon M. Sheldon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Sheldon, K.M., Gordeeva, T.O. (2017). Relative Autonomy Continuum. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_844-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_844-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics