Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Self-Assessment Manikin

  • Teah-Marie Bynion
  • Matthew T. Feldner
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_77-1

Definition

The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) is a picture-oriented questionnaire developed to measure an emotional response (Bradley and Lang 1994). The questionnaire is designed to measure three features of an emotional response that have been identified as central to emotion in research conducted by Lang and colleagues (Lang et al. 1993). Specifically, there are single-item scales that measure valence/pleasure of the response (from positive to negative), perceived arousal (from high to low levels), and perceptions of dominance/control (from low to high levels).

Introduction

Several theorists have explained human emotions as responses to environmental challenges that increase the individual’s likelihood of survival. While there is ongoing debate regarding what the defining features of an emotion are, emotions can be broadly conceptualized as “adaptive action tendencies that occur in response to changes inside or outside the organism, specifically changes that challenge states and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barlow, D. H. (2002). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  2. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley, M. M., Greenwald, M. K., Petry, M., & Lang, P. J. (1992). Remembering pictures: Pleasure and arousal in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 379–390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6(3–4), 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feldner, M. T., Zvolensky, M. J., Eifert, G. H., & Spira, A. P. (2003). Emotional avoidance: An experimental test of individual differences and response suppression using biological challenge. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(4), 403–411.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Keil, A., & Miskovic, V. (2015). Human emotions: A conceptual overview. In K. A. Babson & M. T. Feldner (Eds.), Sleep and affect: Assessment, theory, and clinical implications (pp. 23–44). San Diego: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lang, P. J. (1980). Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: Computer applications. In J. B. Sidowski, J. H. Johnson, & T. A. Williams (Eds.), Technology in mental health care delivery systems (pp. 119–137). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  8. Lang, P. J. (1985). The cognitive psychophysiology of emotion: Anxiety and the anxiety disorders. Hillsdale: Lawrence Eribaum.Google Scholar
  9. Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures: Evaluative, facial, visceral, and behavioral responses. Psychophysiology, 30(3), 261–273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Meagher, M. W., Arnau, R. C., & Rhudy, J. L. (2001). Pain and emotion: Effects of affective picture modulation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63(1), 79–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  12. Morris, J. D. (1995). Observations: SAM: The Self-Assessment Manikin; an efficient cross-cultural measurement of emotional response. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(6), 63–68.Google Scholar
  13. Morris, J. D., Bradley, M. M., & Karrh, J. A. (1994). Assessing affective response to television advertising using the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM). Working paper, University of Florida, College of Journalism and Communications.Google Scholar
  14. Osgood, C., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological ScienceUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA