Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Personality and Romantic Attraction

  • Tanja M. Gerlach
  • Selina K. Reinhard
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_717-2

Synonyms

Definition

Romantic attraction is a complex and multifaceted construct. It refers to positive reactions toward a potential romantic partner, usually at initial or early-stage encounters in which no close relationship has been established yet. Positive reactions toward a potential partner may include positive thoughts and beliefs (cognitive component), positive feelings and emotions (affective component), a desire to approach the other (motivational component), and also behavioral reactions, such as standing or sitting closer (behavioral component; Wurst and Back 2018). As romantic attraction may motivate further contact with a potential partner, it can constitute a basis on which new romantic relationships form. Thus, choices such as expressing interest in seeing a potential partner again in dating contexts like speed or online dating can be viewed as indicators of romantic interest....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Asendorpf, J. B., Penke, L., & Back, M. D. (2011). From dating to mating and relating: Predictors of initial and long-term outcomes of speed-dating in a community sample. European Journal of Personality, 25, 16–30.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Back, M. D., Küfner, A. C. P., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T. M., Rauthmann, J. F., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 1013–1037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599–614.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 491–503.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00491.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  6. De Fruyt, F. D., McCrae, R. R., Szirmák, Z., & Nagy, J. (2004). The five-factor personality inventory as a measure of the five-factor model: Belgian, American, and Hungarian comparisons with the NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 11, 207–215.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104265800.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dufner, M., Rauthmann, J. F., Czarna, A. Z., & Denissen, J. J. (2013). Are narcissists sexy? Zeroing in on the effect of narcissism on short-term mate appeal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 870–882.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213483580.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981–993.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Figueredo, A. J., Sefcek, J. A., & Jones, D. N. (2006). The ideal romantic partner personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 431–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foo, Y. Z., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. (2017). Predictors of facial attractiveness and health in humans. Scientific Reports, 7, 39731.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39731.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerlach, T. M., Arslan, R. C., Schultze, T., Reinhard, S. K., & Penke, L. (2017). Predictive validity and adjustment of ideal partner preferences across the transition into romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000170.
  12. Holtzman, N. S., & Strube, M. J. (2010). Narcissism and attractiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 133–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Humbad, M. N. (2012). Exploring mate preferences from an evolutionary perspective using a speed dating design. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from https://d.lib.msu.edu/etd/1485.
  14. Hunt, L. L., Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2015). Leveling the playing field: Longer acquaintance predicts reduced assortative mating on attractiveness. Psychological Science, 26, 1046–1053.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615579273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jauk, E., Neubauer, A. C., Mairunteregger, T., Pemp, S., Sieber, K. P., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2016). How alluring are dark personalities? The dark triad and attractiveness in speed dating. European Journal of Personality, 30, 125–138.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klohnen, E. C., & Luo, S. (2003). Interpersonal attraction and personality: What is attractive-self similarity, ideal similarity, complementarity or attachment security? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 709–722.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.709.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kurzban, R., & Weeden, J. (2005). Hurrydate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 227–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.126.3.390.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Luo, S., & Zhang, G. (2009). What leads to romantic attraction: Similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study. Journal of Personality, 77, 933–964.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00570.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller, G. F., & Todd, P. M. (1998). Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 190–198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 889–922.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407508096700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olderbak, S. G., Malter, F., Wolf, P. S. A., Jones, D. N., & Figueredo, A. J. (2017). Predicting romantic interest at zero acquaintance: Evidence of sex differences in trait perception but not in predictors of interest. European Journal of Personality, 31, 42–62.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2087.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Rudder, C. (2009, November 17). Your looks and your inbox: How men and women perceive attractiveness [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://theblog.okcupid.com/your-looks-and-your-inbox-8715c0f1561e.
  25. Tidwell, N. D., Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm. Personal Relationships, 20, 199–215.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01405.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wurst, S. N., & Back, M. D. (2018). Attraction, interpersonal. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Encyclopedia of lifespan human development. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  27. Wurst, S. N., Gerlach, T. M., Dufner, M., Rauthmann, J. F., Grosz, M. P., Küfner, A. C. P., Denissen, J. J. A., & Back, M. D. (2017). Narcissism and romantic relationships: The differential impact of narcissistic admiration and rivalry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 280–306.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GoettingenGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Humboldt University of BerlinBerlinGermany

Section editors and affiliations

  • John F. Rauthmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA