Skip to main content

Ipsative Measures of Personality

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Definition

Ipsative measures, also known as forced-choice measures, are measures that force respondents to select from two or more equally socially desirable options.

Ipsative measures, as opposed to Likert scale measures in which respondents choose the degree to which they identify or agree with statements (e.g., 1, strongly disagree, to 5, strongly agree), force respondents to select from two or more equally socially desirable choices. Hicks (1970) differentiated three types of ipsative assessment. In a purely ipsative assessment situation (e.g., Edwards Personal Preference Schedule; EPPS; Edwards 1954), the sum of the scores obtained over the constructs assessed for each respondent is a constant. In other words, a purely ipsative measure is one that produces a mean across all of the scales, and that mean is the same for each person. Hicks (1970) defined a partially ipsative measure (e.g., Gordon Personal Profile; Gordon 1953) as a measure that does not precisely meet the criteria...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baron, H. (1996). Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, C., Martin, B. A., & Hunt, S. T. (2002). A comparison of ipsative and normative approaches for ability to control faking in personality questionnaires. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 10, 240–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. L. (1954). Personal preference schedule: Manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. V. (1953). Gordon personal profile. Oxford: World Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, L. E. (1970). Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N. (1977). Jackson vocational interest survey manual. Port Huron: Research Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. E., Wood, R., & Blinkhorn, S. F. (1988). Spuriouser and spuriouser: The use of ipsative personality tests. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostick, M. (1977). Kostick’s Perception and Preference Inventory. Applied Psychology Associates: Brookline, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. A., Bowen, C.-C., & Hunt, S. T. (2002). How effective are people at faking on personality questionnaires? Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenopyr, M. L. (1988). Artifactual reliability of forced-choice scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 749–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Aitken Schermer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kowalski, C.M., Schermer, J.A. (2019). Ipsative Measures of Personality. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_695-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_695-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics