Definition
Ipsative measures, also known as forced-choice measures, are measures that force respondents to select from two or more equally socially desirable options.
Ipsative measures, as opposed to Likert scale measures in which respondents choose the degree to which they identify or agree with statements (e.g., 1, strongly disagree, to 5, strongly agree), force respondents to select from two or more equally socially desirable choices. Hicks (1970) differentiated three types of ipsative assessment. In a purely ipsative assessment situation (e.g., Edwards Personal Preference Schedule; EPPS; Edwards 1954), the sum of the scores obtained over the constructs assessed for each respondent is a constant. In other words, a purely ipsative measure is one that produces a mean across all of the scales, and that mean is the same for each person. Hicks (1970) defined a partially ipsative measure (e.g., Gordon Personal Profile; Gordon 1953) as a measure that does not precisely meet the criteria...
References
Baron, H. (1996). Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 49–56.
Bowen, C., Martin, B. A., & Hunt, S. T. (2002). A comparison of ipsative and normative approaches for ability to control faking in personality questionnaires. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 10, 240–259.
Edwards, A. L. (1954). Personal preference schedule: Manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
Gordon, L. V. (1953). Gordon personal profile. Oxford: World Book.
Hicks, L. E. (1970). Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 167–184.
Jackson, D. N. (1977). Jackson vocational interest survey manual. Port Huron: Research Psychologists Press.
Johnson, C. E., Wood, R., & Blinkhorn, S. F. (1988). Spuriouser and spuriouser: The use of ipsative personality tests. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 153–162.
Kostick, M. (1977). Kostick’s Perception and Preference Inventory. Applied Psychology Associates: Brookline, MA
Martin, B. A., Bowen, C.-C., & Hunt, S. T. (2002). How effective are people at faking on personality questionnaires? Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 247–256.
Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590.
Tenopyr, M. L. (1988). Artifactual reliability of forced-choice scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 749–751.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kowalski, C.M., Schermer, J.A. (2019). Ipsative Measures of Personality. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_695-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_695-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences