Day residues are defined as content from the last or recent days that reappears in a dream during the night.
The term was introduced by Freud (1900) in his theory on dreams and how dreams may be interpreted. Day residues are meant to have psychological relevance because they can be characterized as “unfinished business,” problems, conflicts, or tasks that have not yet been solved and that are still relevant for the dreamer. Unlike material from the past, day residues relate to current events in the individual’s life.
Day residues, which are detected in dreams, are assumed to be connected to an unconscious wish that is processed in a dream. They are more neutral or harmless in their content and thus better suited to deceive the censorship when connected to the unconscious wishes that are processed in order to be fulfilled by the dream experience. Sometimes it is difficult to define a day residue because all dream contents are supposed to be experienced during the...
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Blagrove, M., Fouquet, N., Henley-Einion, J., Pace-Schott, E., Davies, A., Neuschaffer, J., & Turnbull, O. (2011). Assessing the dream-lag effect for REM and NREM Stage 2 dreams. PLOSone, 6, e26708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026708.
Fisher, C. (1957). A study of the preliminary stages of the constructions of dreams and images. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 5, 5–60.
Fisher, C. (1958). Further observations on the Poetzl Phenomenon. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 11, 3–56.
Fisher, C. (1960). Preconscious stimulation in dreams, associations and images. Classical studies. Introduction, Psychological Issues, Monograph 7 (pp. 1–40). New York: International Universities Press.
Fisher, C. (1988). Further observations on the Poetzl phenomenon. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 11, 3–56.
Fiss, H. (1993). The “Royal Road” to the unconscious revisited: A signal detection model of dream function. In A. Moffitt, M. Kramer, & R. Hoffmann (Eds.), The functions of dreaming (pp. 381–418). New York: State University of New York Press.
Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams, S.E. Vol. IV.
Greenberg, R., & Pearlman, C. (1975). REM sleep and the analytic process: A psychophysiologic bridge. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 44, 392–403.
Langs, R. (1971). Day residues, recall residues, dreams: reality and the psyche. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 19, 499–523.
Leuschner, W. (1986). Mitteilung über eine akustische Methode experimenteller Traumerregung. Psyche, 40, 342–346.
Leuschner, W. (1999). Ergebnisse psychoanalytischer Traumforschung im Labor. In R. Heinz & W. Tress (Eds.), Traumdeutung. Zur Aktualität der Freudschen Traumtheorie (pp. 167–180). Wien: Passagen Verlag. (2001).
Leuschner, W., Hau, S., Brech, E., & Volk, S. (1994). Disassociation and reassociation of subliminally induced stimulus material in drawings of dreams and drawings of waking free imageries. Dreaming, 4, 1–27.
Leuschner, W., Hau, S., & Fischmann, T. (2000). Die akustische Beeinflußbarkeit von Träumen. Tübingen, edition diskord.
Nielsen, T. A., & Powell, R. A. (1989). The “dream-lag” effect: A 6-day temporal delay in dream content incorporation. Psychiatric Journal of the University of Ottawa, 14, 561–565.
Nielsen, T. A., & Powell, R. A. (1992). The day-residue and dream-lag effects: A literature review and limited replication of two temporal effects in dream formation. Dreaming, 2, 67–77.
Nielsen, T. A., Kuiken, D., Alain, G., Stenstrom, P., & Powell, R. (2004). Immediate and delayed incorporations of events into dreams: Further replication and implications for dream function. Journal of Sleep Research, 13, 327–336.
Shevrin, H. (1986). Subliminal perception and dreaming. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 7, 379–396.
Shevrin, H. (1992). The Freudian unconscious and the cognitive unconscious. In J. Barron, M. Eagle, & D. Wolitzky (Eds.), Interface of psychoanalysis and psychology (pp. 313–326). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Shevrin, H. (2000). The investigation of unconscious conflict, unconscious affect, and signal anxiety. In M. Velmans (Ed.), Investigating phenomenal consciousness: New methodologies and maps. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shevrin, H., & Fisher, C. (1967). Changes in the effects of a waking subliminal stimulus as a function of dreaming and nondreaming sleep. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72(4), 362–368.
Shevrin, H., & Luborsky, L. (1958). The measurement of preconscious perception in dreams and images: An investigation of the Poetzl phenomenon. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56, 285–294.
Shevrin, H., Bond, J., Brakel, L., Hertel, R., & Williams, W. (1997). Conscious and unconscious processes. Psychodynamic, cognitive, and neurophysiological convergences. New York: Guilford Press.
Strauch, I., & Meier, B. (2004). In Search of dreams: Results of experimental dream research. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hau, S. (2018). Day’s Residues. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_577-1
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences