Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Eudaimonic Motivation

  • Lukasz D. Kaczmarek
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_514-1



Eudaimonic motivation is the willingness to initiate actions toward personal excellence (Huta and Waterman 2014; Waterman 1990). Eudaimonic pursuits are oriented toward the realization of (a) individual potentials specific for a particular person (e.g., pursuing athletic career) and (b) best universal human potentials shared by each human being (e.g., cultivating wisdom, kindness, or gratitude). The ultimate goal of eudaimonic motivation is the state of flourishing which marks the full development of best potentials. Eudaimonic motivation has been often used and characterized in the opposition to hedonic motivation, i.e., seeking pleasure and avoiding pain (e.g., Waterman 1990). This duality also allows distinguishing between eudaimonists and hedonists as individuals dominated by eudaimonic or hedonic motives. While hedonists primarily seek to feel in a particular way, eudaimonists seek to be a particular type of a person.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., Kashdan, T. B., Short, J. L., & Jarden, A. (2016). Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Psychological Assessment, 28, 471–482.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kesebir, P., & Diener, E. (2008). In pursuit of happiness: Empirical answers to philosophical questions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 117–125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tatarkiewicz, W. (1976). Analysis of happiness. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Waterman, A. S. (1990). The relevance of Aristotle’s conception of eudaimonia for the psychological study of happiness. Theoretical & Philosophical Psychology, 10, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Ravert, R. D., Williams, M. K., Bede Agocha, V., Kim, S. Y., & Brent Donnellan, M. (2010). The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyAdam Mickiewicz University in PoznańPoznanPoland