Nomothetic Study of Personality
Nomothetic is derived from a Greek word “nomos” or law or general law. Thus, nomothetic study of personality is an approach to establish general principles or law about human personal attributes and characteristics which, through many and acceptable research work, lead to the formation of a theory.
During early period of studies on human personality, the focus was on understanding the nature and characteristics of people – with the assumption that people seem to possess personality basic templates or traits that are common, shared, and universal among different cultures globally. Nomothetic approach was introduced by Allport in 1937 to identify general pattern of personality across different groups of individuals. The approach is more of quantitative in nature because in order to explore universal law of personality, the method should be valid, reliable, and replicable. Statistics were used as the major...
- Carducci, B. J. (2009). The psychology of personality: Viewpoints, research and applications. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Cone, J. D. (1986). Idiographic, nomothetic, and related perspectives in behavioral assessment. In R. O. Nelson & S. C. Hayes (Eds.), Conceptual foundations of behavioral assessment (pp. 111–128). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Grice, J. W. (2007). Person-Centered structural analyses. In F. Robins & Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 557–572). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kline, P. (2013). Handbook of psychological testing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Martin, J. (2005). Organisational behaviour and management. London: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- McAdams, D. P. (2015). The art and science of personality development. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51–87). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- McKenna, E. F. (2000). Business psychology and organisational behaviour: A student’s handbook. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1998). Five reasons why the “big five” article has been frequently cited. Personnel Psychology, 51(4), 849–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00743.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roberts, B., Kuncel, N., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Saucier, G., Kenner, J., Iurino, K. M., Philippe, B., Chen, Z., Thalmayer, A. G., Kemmelmeier, M., Tov, W., Boutti, R., Metaferia, H., Cankaya, B., Mastor, K. A., Hsu, K. Y., Wu, R., & Maniruzzaman, M. (2015). Cross-cultural differences in a global survey of world views. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weiner, I. B., & Greene, R. L. (2017). Handbook of personality assessment (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar