Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Imagination

  • Hannah Rachel Scott
  • Sophie von Stumm
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2279-1

Synonyms

Definition

Imagination refers to creating mental representations of concepts, ideas, and sensations in the mind that are not contemporaneously perceived by the senses. Imagination ranges from the re-creation of images or sensory perceptions in the mind that were previously seen or experienced in reality (i.e., reproductive imagination) to crafting images anew independent of prior actual sensory input (i.e., productive imagination).

Introduction

Imagination is both a cognitive process and a trait dimension of individual differences. With regards to the cognitive process, the functions of imagination range from filling the gaps in our perception of the world around us to taking other people’s perspective to forecasting future outcomes for ourselves as well as others. When viewing imagination as a trait dimension of individual differences, all the cognitive process functions are considered, although the focus is on...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Galton, F. (1880). Statistics of mental imagery. Mind, 19, 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 17–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. McGeoch, J. A. (1924). The relationships between three tests of imagination and their correlation with intelligence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8(4), 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“ absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83(3), 268.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wilson, S. C., & Barber, T. X. (1978). The creative imagination scale as a measure of hypnotic responsiveness: Applications to experimental and clinical hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 20(4), 235–249.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyGoldsmiths, University of LondonLondonUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Charlie Reeve
    • 1
  1. 1.University of North Carolina-CharlotteCharlotteUSA