Skip to main content

Hypersensitive Agency Detection

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Synonyms

Hyperactive agency detection; Intentionality bias

Definition

Hypersensitive agency detection (HAD) is the tendency to attribute agency and intentionality where it does not exist or is unlikely to exist (Barrett 2004).

Introduction

Research has shown that people commonly interpret the movement of two-dimensional geometric shapes as being intentional and agentic. For example, in a classic study by Heider and Simmel (1944), participants were asked to view an animation in which three shapes (a large triangle, a small triangle, and a small circle) moved around a screen and in and out of an opening and closing rectangular box. Heider and Simmel found that the majority of participants described the movement of shapes as they would describe the intentional and goal-directed behavior of animals and humans. Participants also often created a story about the shapes (e.g., a person chasing another person), the emotions they experienced (e.g., fear, frustration), and their personal...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barrett, J. L. (2004). Finding agents everywhere. In Why would anyone believe in god? Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. L. (2007). Is the spell really broken? Bio-psychological explanations of religion and theistic belief. Theology and Science, 5, 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Callan, M. J., Dawtry, R. J., & Harvey, A. J. (2016). Someone is pulling the strings: Hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Thinking and Reasoning, 22, 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, D. (1999). The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition, 70, 241–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosset, E. (2008). It’s no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations. Cognition, 108, 771–780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen M. Douglas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Douglas, K.M. (2017). Hypersensitive Agency Detection. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2273-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2273-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics