Synonyms
Definition
Sociosexual orientation reflects individual differences in sexual permissiveness or engagement in uncommitted sexual relations.
Introduction
Sociosexual orientation – or sociosexuality – reflects individual differences in sexual permissiveness or willingness to engage in uncommitted sexual relations (Simpson and Gangestad 1991). Although sociosexuality is considered a trait measure that is continuous, people are often described categorically as having restricted (low) or unrestricted (high) sociosexual orientations. People with unrestricted sociosexual orientations may believe that sex without love or emotional ties is acceptable, whereas people with restrictedsociosexual orientations believe that love, commitment, and emotional closeness are prerequisites for sexual activity. More sexually unrestricted people tend to have greater numbers of sexual partners, casual sexual encounters (hook-ups, one-night-stands),...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bourdage, J. S., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & Perry, A. (2007). Big five and HEXACO model personality correlates of sexuality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1506–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.008.
Edelstein, R. S., Chopik, W. J., & Kean, E. L. (2011). Sociosexuality moderates the association between testosterone and relationship status in men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 60, 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.05.007.
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Journal of Personality, 58, 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00908.x.
Garcia, J. R., & Reiber, C. (2008). Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2, 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099345.
Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.698.
McDonald, M. M., Donnellan, M. B., & Navarrete, C. D. (2012). A life history approach to understanding the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.003.
Mogilski, J. K., Memering, S. L., Welling, L. L. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2017). Monogamy versus consensual non-monogamy: Alternative approaches to pursuing a strategically pluralistic mating strategy. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0658-2.
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113.
Rodrigues, D., Lopes, D., & Smith, V. (2017). Caught in a “bad romance”? Reconsidering the negative association between sociosexuality and relationship functioning. The Journal of Sex Research., 54, 1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1252308.
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000051.
Schmitt, D. P., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Big Five traits related to short-term mating: From personality to promiscuity across 46 nations. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 246–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600204.
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870.
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1992). Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice. Journal of Personality, 60, 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00264.x.
Webster, G. D., & Bryan, A. (2007). Sociosexual attitudes and behaviors: Why two factors are better than one. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 917–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.08.007.
Webster, G. D., Laurenceau, J.-P., Smith, C. V., Mahaffey, A. L., Bryan, A. D., & Brunell, A. B. (2015). An investment model of sociosexuality, relationship satisfaction, and commitment: Evidence from dating, engaged, and newlywed couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 55, 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.02.004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Wongsomboon, V., Mahar, E.A., Webster, G.D. (2018). Sociosexual Orientation. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1581-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1581-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences