Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Values

  • Jan Cieciuch
  • Shalom H. Schwartz
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1509-1

Synonyms

Definition

In a broad sense, “values” refer to what people find important in life. Each of the three main theories of values in the psychology of personality and individual differences proposes a slightly different definition of values. Earliest was Allport (1961; Allport and Vernon 1931), who defined values in motivational terms as interests or dominating forces in life. Second was Rokeach (1973), who defined values in cognitive terms as enduring beliefs that a specific mode of conduct or end state of existence is personally or socially preferable. Most recently, Schwartz (1992) proposed a model that combines both these traditions. He defined values as beliefs (the cognitive element) that differ in their motivational content (the motivational element). More formally, Schwartz (1992) defined values as beliefs about “trans-situational goals, varying in importance, that serve as the guiding principles in the life of a person...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Henry Holt & Company.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W., & Vernon, P. (1931). A test for personal values. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 26(3), 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berzonsky, M. D., Cieciuch, J., Duriez, B., & Soenens, B. (2011). The how and what of identity formation: Associations between identity styles and value orientations. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 295–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borg, I., Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2017). Does the value circle exist within person or only across persons? Journal of Personality, 85(2), 151–162.Google Scholar
  5. Brosch, T., & Sander, D. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of value: Perspectives from economics, neuroscience, philosophy, psychology, and sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cieciuch, J. (2012). Big Five and Big Ten – between Aristotelian and Galilean physics of personality. Theory and Psychology, 22(5), 689–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cieciuch, J., Schwartz, S. H., & Vecchione, M. (2013). Applying the refined values theory to past data: What can researchers gain? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(8), 1215–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., & Algesheimer, R. (2016). The stability and change of value structure and priorities in childhood: A longitudinal study. Social Development, 25(3), 503–527.Google Scholar
  9. Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Bringing values back in. The adequacy of the European social survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 420–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Döring, A. K., Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Groenen, P. J. F., Glatzel, V., Harasimczuk, J., Janowicz, N., Nyagolova, M., Scheefer, E., Allritz, R., Milfont, M., Milfont, T. L., & Bilsky, B. (2015). Cross-cultural evidence of value structures and priorities in childhood. British Journal of Psychology, 106(4), 675–699.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1–46). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Maio, G. R. (2010). Mental representations of social values. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 42, pp. 1–43). Burlington: Academic.Google Scholar
  13. McAdams, D., & Pals, J. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Parks-Leduc, L., Feldman, G., & Bardi, A. (2015). Personality traits and personal values: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(1), 3–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  17. Schwartz, S. H., & Cieciuch, J. (2016). Values. In D. Bertram, F. Cheung, K. Geisinger, J. Hettie, & D. Iliescu (Eds.), ITC handbook of testing and assessment (pp. 106–119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., Dirilen-Gumus, O., & Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Schwartz, H. S., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Torres, C., Dirilem-Gumus, O., & Butenko, T. (2017). Value tradeoffs propel and inhibit behavior: Validating the 19 refined values in four countries. European Journal of Social Psychology (in press). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.2228/full
  20. Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 183–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., & Rowiński, T. (2014). The circumplex of personality metatraits: A synthesizing model of personality based on the Big Five. Review of General Psychology, 18(4), 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vecchione, M., Schwartz, S. H., Alessandri, G., Döring, A. K., Castellani, V., & Caprara, M. G. (2016). Stability and change of basic personal values in early adulthood: An 8-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cardinal Wyszyński UniversityWarsawPoland
  2. 2.University of ZurichZürichSwitzerland
  3. 3.The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
  4. 4.National Research University-Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ilan Dar-Nimrod
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SydneySydneyAustralia