Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Multidimensional Scaling (MDS)

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1329-1

Synonyms

Definition

Multidimensional scaling (MDS) is a statistical technique for presenting the similarities or dissimilarities between objects in a graphical way. This visual representation of the similarities can be presented in a n-dimensional space, although two dimensions are typically used to describe the structure of the analyzed objects.

Introduction

In the social sciences in general and psychology in particular, the researcher addresses similarities between objects while describing and explaining various phenomena. Finding nonobvious similarities between different objects can be a valuable contribution in itself. Moreover, similarities identified between objects can reveal underlying latent dimensions that organize the observed similarities between objects and therefore can help in constructing a theoretical model. MDS is a technique for visualizing similarities between objects to help to understand the data and enhance theory building....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The work was supported by Grants 2014/14/M/HS6/00919 from the National Science Centre, Poland.

References

  1. Bilsky, W., Janik, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2011). The structural organization of human values – Evidence from three rounds of the European social survey (ESS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 759–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Borg, I., Groenen, P. J. F., & Mair, P. (2013). Applied multidimensional scaling, Springer briefs in statistics. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borg, I., Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2017). Does the value circle exist within persons or only across persons? Journal of Personality, 85(2), 151–162.Google Scholar
  5. Cieciuch, J., Döring, A. K., & Harasimczuk, J. (2013). Measuring Schwartz’s values in childhood: Multidimensional scaling across instruments and cultures. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 625–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Groenen, P., & van der Lans, I. (2006). Multidimensional scaling with regional restrictions for facet theory: An application to Levy’s political protest data. In M. Braun & P. P. Mohler (Eds.), Beyond the horizon of measurement (ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial, Vol. 10, pp. 41–64). Mannheim: ZUMA.Google Scholar
  7. Spence, I., & Ogilvie, J. C. (1973). A table of expected stress values for random rankings in nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 8, 511–517.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., Dirilen-Gumus, O., & Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in WarsawWarsawPoland
  2. 2.University of ZurichZürichSwitzerland