Synonyms
Definition
Content validity refers to the degree to which the test content elicits behaviors that are representative of the universe of construct-related behaviors the test is designed to measure.
Introduction
Content validity is an important criterion for the development and evaluation of psychological and educational tests (broadly defined as evaluative device or procedure including scales, interviews, behavior observations, and assessment processes integrating information from diverse sources; cf. AERA, APA, and NCME 2014). Each test yields at least one test score that is used as an indicator of a latent individual difference variable (construct). During test development, the test developer assigns a label to the test score (e.g., verbal reasoning) but whether the test score actually measures what the label suggests needs careful scrutiny of the test content. To support the validity argument concerning a specific test score, a rational...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Aiken, L. R., & Groth-Marnat, G. (2006). Psychological testing and assessment (12th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
American Educational Research Association [AERA], American Psychological Association [APA], and National Council on Measurement in Education [NCME]. (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington: American Educational Research Association.
Gregory, R. J. (1996). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kemper, C. J., & Hock, M. (2015). New evidence on the construct validity of the ASI-3 and the dimensional conceptualization of trait anxiety sensitivity from IRT modeling. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 1–9. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000284.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Thorndike, R. L., & Hagen, E. P. (1977). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
Ziegler, M. (2014). Stop and state your intentions!: Let’s not forget the ABC of test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(4), 239–242.
Ziegler, M., Kemper, C. J., & Lenzner, T. (2015). The issue of fuzzy concepts in test construction and possible remedies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31(1), 1–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kemper, C.J. (2017). Content Validity. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1289-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1289-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences