Synonyms
Definition
The standard social science model is the notion that the mind is a blank slate, and our social applications, morals, and practices are learned.
Standard Social Science Model of Personality
One of the most contentious arguments regarding human psychology is whether the mind is a “blank slate” or equipped with evolved domain-specific mechanisms. In the past, the notion that humans are born as blank slates dominated the social sciences, but recent shifts in cognitive research have provided us with a better understanding of how the human mind functions (Pinker 2002). As a result of these advances, the blank slate approach has largely been abandoned. The purpose of this entry is to revisit the blank slate approach by reviewing the standard social science model (SSSM) that was described by Tooby and Cosmides (1992) as well as their proposed alternative model.
Standard Social Science Model
It has sometimes been argued...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Allen, T. A., & DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Personality neuroscience and the five factor model. In T. A. Widiger (Ed.), Oxford handbook of the five factor model. New York: Oxford University Press.
Blackwell, L., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
Bouchard, T. J., & McGue, M. (2003). Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. Journal of Neurobiology, 54, 4–45.
Mallon, R., & Stich, S. P. (2000). The odd couple: The compatibility of social construction and evolutionary psychology. Philosophy of Science, 67, 133–154.
Nettle, D. (2007). Personality: What makes you the way you are. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Penguin Putnam.
Richardson, R. C. (2007). Evolutionary psychology as maladapted psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wallace, B. (2010). Getting Darwin wrong: Why evolutionary psychology won’t work. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Vrabel, J., Zeigler-Hill, V. (2017). Standard Social Science Model (SSSM) of Personality. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1188-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1188-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences