Skip to main content

Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R)

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Babiak, P., Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (2010). Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 174–193. doi:10.1002/bsl.925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13, 171–188. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the revised psychopathy checklist (1st ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (2003). The hare psychopathy checklist-revised (2nd ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawes, S. W., Boccaccini, M. T., & Murrie, D. C. (2013). Psychopathy and the combination of psychopathy and sexual deviance as predictors of sexual recidivism: Meta-analytic findings using the psychopathy checklist-revised. Psychological Assessment, 25, 233–243. doi:10.1037/a0030391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C. D., Clark, H. J., & Forth, A. E. (2010). Psychopathy, expert testimony, and indeterminate sentences: Exploring the relationship between psychopathy checklist-revised testimony and trial outcome in Canada. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 323–339. doi:10.1348/135532509X468432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Guarnera, L. A., & Rufino, K. A. (2013). Are forensic experts biased by the side that retained them? Psychological Science, 24, 1889–1897. doi:10.1177/0956797613481812.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, T. M. S., & Grisso, T. (2014). Assessment practices and expert judgment methods in forensic psychology and psychiatry: An international snapshot. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 1406–1421. doi:10.1177/0093854814548449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C. M., Meyer, R. G., Van Nort, J. J., & Tristan, L. (2006). Two-, three-, and four-factor PCL-R models in applied sex offender risk assessments. Assessment, 13, 208–216. doi:10.1177/1073191106287116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., Wong, S., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 740–767. doi:10.1037/a0020473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Blais .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Blais, J., Ritchie, M.B. (2016). Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1100-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1100-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics