Encyclopedia of GIS

Living Edition
| Editors: Shashi Shekhar, Hui Xiong, Xun Zhou

3D Network Analysis for User Centric Evacuation Systems

  • Umit Atila
  • Ismail Rakip Karas
  • Yasin Ortakci
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23519-6_1549-1


Research on evacuation of high-rise buildings in case of disasters such as fire, terrorist attacks, indoor air pollution incidents, etc., has become popular in the last decade. In case of such disasters, people inside the buildings should be evacuated out of the area as soon as possible. However, organizing a quick and safe evacuation is a difficult procedure due to the complexity of high-rise buildings and the huge number of people occupied inside such buildings. Besides, problems such as smoke inhalation, confluence, panic, and inaccessibility of some exits may arise during the evacuation procedure. Therefore, an efficient user-centric evacuation system should be developed for quick and safe evacuation from high and complex buildings.

Routing someone to an appropriate exit in safety can only be possible with a system that can manage the 3D topological transportation network of a building. Realizing an evacuation of a building in such systems also called navigation...


Movement Time Evacuation System Sight Distance Network Analysis Tool Metadata Table 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.



This study was supported by TUBITAK-The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey research grant [grant number: 112Y050]. We are indebted for its financial support.


  1. Bryan J (1977) Smoke as a determinant of human behaviour in fire situations: project people. NBS GCR 77–94, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Bryan J (1995) Behavioural response to fire and smoke. In: SFPE, handbook of fire protection engineering, vol 3, 2nd edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, pp 241–262Google Scholar
  3. Bryan J (2002) Human behaviour in fire. Fire Prot Eng 16:4–16Google Scholar
  4. Cutter S, Richardson DB, Wilbanks TJ (eds) (2003) The geographical dimensions of terrorism. Routledge, New York/London, pp 75–117Google Scholar
  5. Gröger G, Kolbe TH, Czerwinski A, Nagel C (2008) OpenGIS city geography markup language (CityGML) encoding standard: OGC 08-007r1. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc., 7–10, 22–25, 56–62, 77–79Google Scholar
  6. Gwynne S, Galea ER, Lawrence PJ, Filippidis L (1999) A review of the methodologies used in the computer simulation of evacuation from the built environment. Build Environ 34:741–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holborn PG, Nolan PF, Golt J (2003) An analysis of fatal unintentional dwelling fires investigated by London Fire Brigade between 1996 and 2000. Fire Saf J 38(1):1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jin T (1976) Visibility through fire smoke – Part 5, allowable smoke density for escape from fire. Report No. 42, Fire Research Institute of JapanGoogle Scholar
  9. Jun C, Kim H, Kim G (2009) Developing an indoor evacuation simulator using a hybrid 3D model. In: Lee J, Zlatanova S (eds) 3D Geo-information science. Springer, Berlin, pp 173–178Google Scholar
  10. Karas IR, Batuk F, Akay AE, Baz I (2006) Automatically extracting 3D models and network analysis for indoors. In: Abdul-Rahman A, Zlatanova S, Coors V (eds) Innovation in 3D-geo information system. Springer, Berlin, pp 395–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kothuri R, Godfrind A, Beinat E (2010) Pro Oracle spatial for Oracle database 11g. Apress, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Kwan MP, Lee J (2005) Emergency response after 9/11: the potential of real-time 3D GIS for quick emergency response in micro-spatial environments. Comput Environ Urban Syst 29:93–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee J (2007) A three-dimensional navigable data model to support emergency response in microspatial built-environments. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 97(3):512–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mawson A (1980) Is the concept of panic useful for scientific purposes? In: Second international seminar on human behavior in fire emergencies. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Murray C (2009) Oracle spatial developer’s guide, 11g release 1 (11.1). Oracle. pp 4–8Google Scholar
  16. Musliman IA, Rahman AA (2008) Implementing 3D network analysis in 3D GIS. In: International archives of ISPRS, Beijing, vol 37, Part B, Comm. 4/4Google Scholar
  17. Musliman IA, Rahman AA, Coors V (2006) 3D navigation for 3D-GIS – initial requirements. In: Abdul-Rahman A, Zlatanova S, Coors V (eds) Innovations in 3D geo information systems. Springer, Berlin/New York, pp 125–134Google Scholar
  18. Pu S, Zlatanova S (2005) Evacuation route calculation of inner buildings. In: van Oosterom PJM, Zlatanova S, Fendel EM (eds) Geo-information for disaster management. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1143–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Purser DA, Bensilum M (2001) Quantification of a behaviour for engineering design standards and escape time calculations. Saf Sci 38:157–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sime JD (1985) Movement towards the familiar person and place affiliation a fire entrapment setting. Environ Behav 17:697–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wood PG (1972) The behaviour of people in fires. Fire research note, No. 953, Building Research Establishment. Fire Research Station, Borehamwood, p 113Google Scholar
  22. Zlatanova S, van Oosterom P, Verbree E (2004) 3D technology for improving disaster management: geo-DBMS and positioning. In: Proceedings of the XXth ISPRS congress, IstanbulGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Umit Atila
    • 1
  • Ismail Rakip Karas
    • 1
  • Yasin Ortakci
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringKarabuk UniversityKarabukTurkey