3D Network Analysis for User Centric Evacuation Systems
Research on evacuation of high-rise buildings in case of disasters such as fire, terrorist attacks, indoor air pollution incidents, etc., has become popular in the last decade. In case of such disasters, people inside the buildings should be evacuated out of the area as soon as possible. However, organizing a quick and safe evacuation is a difficult procedure due to the complexity of high-rise buildings and the huge number of people occupied inside such buildings. Besides, problems such as smoke inhalation, confluence, panic, and inaccessibility of some exits may arise during the evacuation procedure. Therefore, an efficient user-centric evacuation system should be developed for quick and safe evacuation from high and complex buildings.
Routing someone to an appropriate exit in safety can only be possible with a system that can manage the 3D topological transportation network of a building. Realizing an evacuation of a building in such systems also called navigation...
KeywordsMovement Time Evacuation System Sight Distance Network Analysis Tool Metadata Table
This study was supported by TUBITAK-The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey research grant [grant number: 112Y050]. We are indebted for its financial support.
- Bryan J (1977) Smoke as a determinant of human behaviour in fire situations: project people. NBS GCR 77–94, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Bryan J (1995) Behavioural response to fire and smoke. In: SFPE, handbook of fire protection engineering, vol 3, 2nd edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, pp 241–262Google Scholar
- Bryan J (2002) Human behaviour in fire. Fire Prot Eng 16:4–16Google Scholar
- Cutter S, Richardson DB, Wilbanks TJ (eds) (2003) The geographical dimensions of terrorism. Routledge, New York/London, pp 75–117Google Scholar
- Gröger G, Kolbe TH, Czerwinski A, Nagel C (2008) OpenGIS city geography markup language (CityGML) encoding standard: OGC 08-007r1. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc., 7–10, 22–25, 56–62, 77–79Google Scholar
- Jin T (1976) Visibility through fire smoke – Part 5, allowable smoke density for escape from fire. Report No. 42, Fire Research Institute of JapanGoogle Scholar
- Jun C, Kim H, Kim G (2009) Developing an indoor evacuation simulator using a hybrid 3D model. In: Lee J, Zlatanova S (eds) 3D Geo-information science. Springer, Berlin, pp 173–178Google Scholar
- Kothuri R, Godfrind A, Beinat E (2010) Pro Oracle spatial for Oracle database 11g. Apress, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Mawson A (1980) Is the concept of panic useful for scientific purposes? In: Second international seminar on human behavior in fire emergencies. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Murray C (2009) Oracle spatial developer’s guide, 11g release 1 (11.1). Oracle. pp 4–8Google Scholar
- Musliman IA, Rahman AA (2008) Implementing 3D network analysis in 3D GIS. In: International archives of ISPRS, Beijing, vol 37, Part B, Comm. 4/4Google Scholar
- Musliman IA, Rahman AA, Coors V (2006) 3D navigation for 3D-GIS – initial requirements. In: Abdul-Rahman A, Zlatanova S, Coors V (eds) Innovations in 3D geo information systems. Springer, Berlin/New York, pp 125–134Google Scholar
- Wood PG (1972) The behaviour of people in fires. Fire research note, No. 953, Building Research Establishment. Fire Research Station, Borehamwood, p 113Google Scholar
- Zlatanova S, van Oosterom P, Verbree E (2004) 3D technology for improving disaster management: geo-DBMS and positioning. In: Proceedings of the XXth ISPRS congress, IstanbulGoogle Scholar