Skip to main content

Topological Relationships and Their Use

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Definition

Topological relations between spatial objects have been widely recognized, implemented, and used in GIS. They provide a notion of the general structure and the interactions of spatial objects. Topology avoids dealing with geometry by introducing topological primitives, namely, boundary, interior, and exterior. The topological primitives allow to define approximate topological relationships between 0D (point), 1D (linestring ), 2D (surface), and 3D (body) spatial objects in 0D, 1D, 2D, and 3D space. The nine-intersection model is the well-known framework for detecting binary topological relationships (Egenhofer and Herring, 1992) and is adopted by the Opengeospatial Consortium as a basic framework for implementation. Suppose two simple spatial objects A and B are defined in the same topological space X and their boundary, interior, and exterior are denoted by ∂ A, A , A , ∂ B, B , and B . The binary relationship R(A, B) between the two objects is then identified by...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Armstrong MA (1983) Basic topology. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Billen R, Kurata Y (2008) Refining topological relations between regions considering their shapes. In: Raunbal M, Miller J, Frank AU et al (eds) Geographic information science. Lecture notes in computer science. Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 18–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrman A, Rank E (2009) Topological analysis of 3D building models using a spatial query language. Adv Eng Inform 23(4):370–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breunig M, Zlatanova S (2011) 3D geo-database research: retrospective and future directions. Comput Geosci 37(7):791–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clementini E, di Felice P (1997) Approximate topological relations. Int J Approx Reason 16:173–204

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clementini E, di Felice P, van Oosterom PJM (1993) A small set of formal topological relations suitable for end-user interaction. In: Proceedings of the 3th international symposium on large spatial databases. Springer, Berlin, pp 277–295

    Google Scholar 

  • de Hoop S, van de Meij L, Molenaar M (1993) Topological relations in 3D vector maps. In: Proceedings of 4th EGIS, Genoa, pp 448–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng M, Cheng T, Chen X et al (2007) Multi-level topological relations between spatial regions based upon topological invariants. Geoinformatica 11:239–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer MJ (1995) Topological relations in 3D. Technical report, University of Maine

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer MJ, Franzosa RD (1991) Point-set topological spatial relations. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 5:161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer MJ, Herring JR (1992) Categorising topological relations between regions, lines and points in geographic databases. In: Egenhofer MJ, Herring IR (eds) A framework for the definition of topological relationships and an approach to spatial reasoning within this framework, Santa Barbara, pp 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer MJ, Sharma J, Mark D (1993) A critical comparison of the 4-intersection and 9-intersection models for spatial relations: formal analysis. In: Autocarto 11, Minneapolis, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer MJ, Clementini E, di Felice P (1994) Topological relations between regions with holes. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 8(2):129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellul C (2013) Can topological pre-culling of faces improve rendering performance of city models in Google Earth. In: Pouliot J, Daniel S, Hubert F, Zamyadi Z (eds) Progress and new trends in 3D geoinformation sciences. Springer, Heidelberg/New York, pp 133–154

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ellul C, Haklay M (2007) The research agenda for topological and spatial databases. Comput Environ Urban Syst 31:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman J (1975) The modelling of spatial relations. Comput Graph Image Process 4:156–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gröger G, George B (2012) Geometry and topology. In: Kresse W, Danilo DM (eds) Springer handbook of geographic information. Springer, Berlin/New York, pp 159–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring JR (1991) The mathematical modeling of spatial and non-spatial information in geographic information systems. In: Mark D, Frank A (eds) Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 313–350

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herring JR (2011) OpenGIS implementation specification for geographic information – simple feature access – Part 1: Common architecture: Version: 1.2.1, OGC Doc. No OGC 06-103r3

    Google Scholar 

  • Kufoniyi O (1995) Spatial coincidence modelling, automated database updating and data consistency in vector GIS. PhD thesis, ITC, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Li KJ, Zlatanova S, Kolbe TH, Nagel C, Becker T (2014) IndoorGML, Version 1.0, OGC Doc. No OGC 14-005r3

    Google Scholar 

  • Louwsma J, Zlatanova S, van Lammeren R, van Oosterom P (2006) Specifying and Implementing Constraints in GIS–with Examples from a Geo-Virtual Reality System. In: GeoInformatica, vol 10, No 4, pp 531–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullar DV, Egenhofer MJ (1988) Toward the definition and use of topological relations among spatial objects. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on spatial data handling, Sydney, pp 225–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaap J, Zlatanova S, van Oosterom PJM (2012) Towards a 3D geo-data model to support pedestrian routing in multimodal public transport travel advices, In: Zlatanova S, Ledoux H, Fendel EM, Rumor M (eds) Urban and regional data management. UDMS annual 2011. CRC press/Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton/London, pp 63–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider M, Behr T (2006) Topological relationships between complex spatial objects. ACM Trans Database Syst 31(1):39–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strobl C (2008) Dimensionally extended nine-intersection model (DE-9IM). In: Shekhar S, Xiong H (eds) Encyclopaedia of GIS. Springer, Berlin, pp 240–245

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Oosterom PJM, Stoter J, Quak W, Zlatanova S (2002) The balance between geometry and topology. In: Richardson D, van Oosterom PJM (eds) Advances in spatial data handling. 10th international symposium on spatial data handling. Springer, Berlin, pp 209–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard S (1970) General topology. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu D, Zlatanova S (2013) Am approach to develop 3D GeoDBMS topological operators by reducing existing 2D operators, ISPRS annals – volume II-2/W1, 2013, WG II/2, 8th 3D GeoInfo conference & ISPRS WG II/2 workshop, Nov 2013, pp 291–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatanova S (2000a) 3D GIS for urban development. PhD thesis, Graz University of Technology, ITC, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatanova S (2000b) On 3D topological relationships, In: Proceedings of the 11th international workshop on database and expert system applications (DEXA 2000), 6–8 Sept. Greenwich, London, pp 913–919

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatanova S, Tijssen TPM, van Oosterom PJM, Quak WC (2003) Research on usability of Oracle spatial within RWS organisation, GISt No. 21, ISSN:1569–0245, ISBN:90-77029-07-9, AGI-GAG-2003-21, Delft, 75p

    Google Scholar 

Recommended Reading

  • Billen R, Zlatanova S (2003) 3D spatial relationship model: a useful concept for 3D cadastre? Comput Environ Urban Syst 27:411–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clementini E, Sharma J, Egenhofer MJ (1994) Modelling topological spatial relations: strategies for query processing. Comput Graph 18(6):815–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida JP, Morley JG, Dowman IJ (2007) Graph theory in higher order topological analysis of urban scenes. Comput Environ Urban Syst 31:426–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer MJ, Herring JR (1990) A mathematical framework for the definition of topological relations. In: Proceedings of fourth international symposium on SDH, Zurich, pp 803–813

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar-Molano ML, Barret DA, Carson E et al (2007) A representation for databases of 3D objects. Comput Environ Urban Syst 31:409–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazelton NW, Bennett L, Masel J (1992) Topological structures for 4-dimensional geographic information systems. Comput Environ Urban Syst 16(3):227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Lee J (2008) Defining 3D spatial neighborhood for topological analyses using a 3D network-based topological data model-CA- building based evacuation simulation. The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, Beijing, vol XXXVII, Part B2, pp 305–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting E, Battat J, Teller S (2007) Topology of urban environments. In: Dong A, Vande Moere, Gero JS (eds) Computer-aided architectural design futures (CAADFutures). Springer, Berlin, pp 114–128

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sisi Zlatanova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Zlatanova, S. (2015). Topological Relationships and Their Use. In: Shekhar, S., Xiong, H., Zhou, X. (eds) Encyclopedia of GIS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23519-6_1548-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23519-6_1548-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23519-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics