Synonyms
Definition
Humans conceptualize an entity’s spatial location in terms of qualitative relation to other entities, rather than metric coordinates. This has wide-ranging implications across fields in cognitive science and has led to the identification of a set of concepts called frame of reference (henceforth FoR). FoRs allow a systematic schematization of space by relating a to-be-located entity (including the self) to its environment (typically another entity) on the basis of qualitative direction concepts such as left, north, or point-of-view from above or from the self. Psychological research in particular distinguishes most centrally between allocentric (ego-independent) and egocentric (viewer-based) FoRs (Klatzky, 1998). In language, terms expressing directiongenerally require a FoR due to the variability of concepts that can provide a basis for establishing a directional relation between entities. Research in this...
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Bateman JA, Hois J, Ross RJ, Tenbrink T (2010) A linguistic ontology of space for natural language processing. Artif Intell 174(14):1027–1071
Burgess N, Spiers HJ, Paleologou E (2004) Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory. Cognition 94(2):149–166
Carlson LA (1999) Selecting a reference frame. Spat Cogn Comput 1(4):365–379
Carlson LA, Regier T, Lopez W, Corrigan B (2006) Attention unites form and function in spatial language. Spat Cogn Comput 6(4):295–308
Carroll M (1997) Changing place in English and German: language-specific preferences in the conceptualization of spatial relations. In: Nuyts J (ed) Language and conceptualization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, pp 137–161
Chilton P (2013) Frames of reference and the linguistic conceptualization of time: present and future. In: Jaszczolt KM, de Saussure L (eds) Time: language, cognition, and reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ekstrom AD, Arnold AEGF, Iaria G (2014) A critical review of the allocentric spatial representation and its neural underpinnings: toward a network-based perspective. Front Hum Neurosci 8:803
Eschenbach C (1999) Geometric structures of frames of reference and natural language semantics. Spat Cogn Comput 1(4):329–348
Flavell JH (1963) The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. Van Nostrand, New York
Hernández D (1991) Qualitative representation of spatial knowledge. Number 804 in lecture notes in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin
Herrmann T (1990) Vor, hinter, rechts und links: das 6H-Modell. Psychologische Studien zum sprachlichen Lokalisieren. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 78:117–140
Kelleher J, van Genabith J (2006) A computational model of the referential semantics of projective prepositions. In: Saint-Dizier P (ed) Syntax and semantics of prepositions. Volume 29 of text, speech and language technology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 211–228
Klatzky RL (1998) Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In: Freksa C, Habel C, Wender KF (eds) Spatial cognition I, pp 1–17. Springer, New York
Levinson SC (1996) Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: crosslinguistic evidence. In: Bloom P, Peterson MA, Nadel L, Garrett MF (eds) Language and space. MIT, Cambridge, pp 109–169
Levinson SC (2003) Space in language and cognition: explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mast V, Wolter D, Klippel A, Wallgruen JO, Tenbrink T (2014) Boundaries and prototypes in categorizing direction. In: Freksa C, Nebel B, Hegarty M, Barkowsky T (eds) Spatial cognition, Bremen, 15–19 Sept 2014. Springer, Berlin, pp 92–107
Moratz R, Tenbrink T (2006) Spatial reference in linguistic human-robot interaction: iterative, empirically supported development of a model of projective relations. Spat Cogn Comput 6(1):63–107
Pederson E, Danziger E, Wilkins D, Levinson S, Kita S, Senft G (1998) Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language 74:557–589
Retz-Schmidt G (1988) Various views on spatial prepositions. AI Mag 9(2):95–105
Talmy L (2000) Towards a cognitive semantics. A Bradford book. MIT, Cambridge
Taylor HA, Tversky B (1996) Perspective in spatial descriptions. J Mem Lang 35:371–391
Tenbrink T (2011) Reference frames of space and time in language. J Pragmat 43(3):704–722
Tenbrink T, Kuhn W (2011) A model of spatial reference frames in language. In: Egenhofer M, Giudice N, Moratz R, Worboys M (eds) COSIT 2011. LNCS 6899. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 371–390
Wang RF, Spelke ES (2000) Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition 77:215
Wen W, Ishikawa T, Sato T (2013) Individual differences in the encoding processes of egocentric and allocentric survey knowledge. Cogn Sci 37(1):176–192
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Tenbrink, T. (2015). Reference Frames. In: Shekhar, S., Xiong, H., Zhou, X. (eds) Encyclopedia of GIS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23519-6_1538-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23519-6_1538-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23519-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering