Synonyms
Definition
Humans conceptualize an entity’s spatial location in terms of qualitative relation to other entities, rather than metric coordinates. This has wide-ranging implications across fields in cognitive science and has led to the identification of a set of concepts called frame of reference (henceforth FoR). FoRs allow a systematic schematization of space by relating a to-be-located entity (including the self) to its environment (typically another entity) on the basis of qualitative direction concepts such as left, north, or point-of-view from above or from the self. Psychological research in particular distinguishes most centrally between allocentric (ego-independent) and egocentric (viewer-based) FoRs (Klatzky, 1998). In language, terms expressing directiongenerally require a FoR due to the variability of concepts that can provide a basis for establishing a directional relation between entities. Research in this...
References
Bateman JA, Hois J, Ross RJ, Tenbrink T (2010) A linguistic ontology of space for natural language processing. Artif Intell 174(14):1027–1071
Burgess N, Spiers HJ, Paleologou E (2004) Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory. Cognition 94(2):149–166
Carlson LA (1999) Selecting a reference frame. Spat Cogn Comput 1(4):365–379
Carlson LA, Regier T, Lopez W, Corrigan B (2006) Attention unites form and function in spatial language. Spat Cogn Comput 6(4):295–308
Carroll M (1997) Changing place in English and German: language-specific preferences in the conceptualization of spatial relations. In: Nuyts J (ed) Language and conceptualization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, pp 137–161
Chilton P (2013) Frames of reference and the linguistic conceptualization of time: present and future. In: Jaszczolt KM, de Saussure L (eds) Time: language, cognition, and reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ekstrom AD, Arnold AEGF, Iaria G (2014) A critical review of the allocentric spatial representation and its neural underpinnings: toward a network-based perspective. Front Hum Neurosci 8:803
Eschenbach C (1999) Geometric structures of frames of reference and natural language semantics. Spat Cogn Comput 1(4):329–348
Flavell JH (1963) The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. Van Nostrand, New York
Hernández D (1991) Qualitative representation of spatial knowledge. Number 804 in lecture notes in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin
Herrmann T (1990) Vor, hinter, rechts und links: das 6H-Modell. Psychologische Studien zum sprachlichen Lokalisieren. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 78:117–140
Kelleher J, van Genabith J (2006) A computational model of the referential semantics of projective prepositions. In: Saint-Dizier P (ed) Syntax and semantics of prepositions. Volume 29 of text, speech and language technology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 211–228
Klatzky RL (1998) Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In: Freksa C, Habel C, Wender KF (eds) Spatial cognition I, pp 1–17. Springer, New York
Levinson SC (1996) Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: crosslinguistic evidence. In: Bloom P, Peterson MA, Nadel L, Garrett MF (eds) Language and space. MIT, Cambridge, pp 109–169
Levinson SC (2003) Space in language and cognition: explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mast V, Wolter D, Klippel A, Wallgruen JO, Tenbrink T (2014) Boundaries and prototypes in categorizing direction. In: Freksa C, Nebel B, Hegarty M, Barkowsky T (eds) Spatial cognition, Bremen, 15–19 Sept 2014. Springer, Berlin, pp 92–107
Moratz R, Tenbrink T (2006) Spatial reference in linguistic human-robot interaction: iterative, empirically supported development of a model of projective relations. Spat Cogn Comput 6(1):63–107
Pederson E, Danziger E, Wilkins D, Levinson S, Kita S, Senft G (1998) Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language 74:557–589
Retz-Schmidt G (1988) Various views on spatial prepositions. AI Mag 9(2):95–105
Talmy L (2000) Towards a cognitive semantics. A Bradford book. MIT, Cambridge
Taylor HA, Tversky B (1996) Perspective in spatial descriptions. J Mem Lang 35:371–391
Tenbrink T (2011) Reference frames of space and time in language. J Pragmat 43(3):704–722
Tenbrink T, Kuhn W (2011) A model of spatial reference frames in language. In: Egenhofer M, Giudice N, Moratz R, Worboys M (eds) COSIT 2011. LNCS 6899. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 371–390
Wang RF, Spelke ES (2000) Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition 77:215
Wen W, Ishikawa T, Sato T (2013) Individual differences in the encoding processes of egocentric and allocentric survey knowledge. Cogn Sci 37(1):176–192
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Tenbrink, T. (2015). Reference Frames. In: Shekhar, S., Xiong, H., Zhou, X. (eds) Encyclopedia of GIS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23519-6_1538-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23519-6_1538-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23519-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering