Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics

Living Edition
| Editors: Deborah C Poff, Alex C. Michalos

Anonymity, Confidentiality and De-identified Data

  • Martin Tolich
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_42-1

Introduction

Anonymity is defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as “of unknown name, unknown or unclear sources or authorship, without character, featureless, impersonal.” However, within the social sciences, the concept of anonymity can have a less absolute interpretation allowing for a person’s identity to be disguised by pseudonyms. Some research council funding policies encourage this practice by mandating the storage of anonymized data for future unspecified research. Yet qualitative research data can only be stripped of identifiers; it cannot be anonymized. To understand the difference between an unknown anonymous source and a disguised confidential source, it is important to consider four nuances of data collection; first, how differently the process of informed consent is enacted in quantitative and qualitative research; second, while the concept external confidentiality appears in ethical guidelines, its inverse internal confidentiality does not, for example, the failure to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Corti L, Day A, Backhouse G (2000) Confidentiality and informed consent: issues for consideration in the preservation of and provision of access to qualitative data archives. Forum Qual Soc Res 1(3). Retrieved from www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1024/2207
  2. ESRC Research Data Policy (2015) Economic and Social Research Council. Retrieved from http://www.esrc.ac.uk/files/about-us/policies-and-standards/esrc-research-data-policy/
  3. Muchmore JA (2002) Methods and ethics in a life history study of teacher thinking. Qual Rep 7(4):1–17Google Scholar
  4. Saunders B, Kitzinger J, Kitzinger C (2015) Anonymising interview data: challenges and compromise in practice. Qual Res 15(5):616–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Scheper-Hughes N (2000) Ire in Ireland. Ethnography 1(1):117–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Tolich M (2004) Internal confidentiality: when confidentiality assurances fail relational participants. Qual Sociol 27(1):101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Whyte WF (1981 [1943]) Street corner society: the social structure of an Italian slum. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Section editors and affiliations

  • Mark Israel
    • 1
  1. 1.Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)PerthAustralia