Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics

Living Edition
| Editors: Deborah C Poff, Alex C. Michalos


Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_21-1



Alienation refers to the social phenomenon where people are dominated by forces of their own creation, yet may fail to recognize their own authorship relative to institutions and processes at hand. The reification of these social constructs contributes to human alienation in all spheres of life. From a classical conflict perspective, alienation is to be found in all major institutions that comprise the superstructure of capitalist societies (e.g., religion, family, the state and state functions) and political economy. As Marx writes, “Objectification is the practice of alienation” (Marx in Bottomore 1963: 39).


Unlike more contemporary usages wherein alienation (and powerlessness and normlessness) are framed in more social psychological terms, classical conflict approaches to alienation frame the concept firmly in the relationship of people to their work and the extent to which they have...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Adler PA, Adler P (2005) Self-injurers as loners: the social organization of solitary deviance. Deviant Behav 26(4):345–378. doi: 10.1080/016396290931696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archibald WP (1989) Marx and the missing link: “Human Nature”. Humanities Press International, Atlantic HighlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behery M, Al-Nasser A (2016) Examining the impact of leadership style and coaching on employees’ commitment and trust: mediation effect of bullying and job alienation. Int J Organ Anal 24(2):291–314. doi: 10.1108/IJOA-03-2014-0749 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bottomore TB (ed) (1963) Karl Marx: early writings. C. A. Watts, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiaburu DS, Diaz, De Vos A (2013) Employee alienation: relationships with careerism and career satisfaction. J Manag Psychol 28(1):4–20. doi: 10.1108/02683941311298832 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coser LA (1971) Masters of sociological thought. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Durkheim E (1979) Suicide: a study in sociology. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Durkheim E (1984) The division of labor in society. Free Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garfinkel H (1956) Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. Am J Sociol 61(5):420–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lemert EM (1962) Paranoia and the dynamics of exclusion. Sociometry 25(1):2–20. doi: 10.2307/2786032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Merton RK (1938) Social structure and anomie. Am Sociol Rev 3(5):672–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Michaelson C, Pratt MG, Grant AM et al (2014) Meaningful work: connecting business ethics and organization. Stud J Bus Ethics 121(1):77–90. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1675-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Orru M (1983) The ethics of anomie: Jean Marie Guyau and Émile Durkheim. Br J Sociol 34(4):499–518. doi: 10.2307/590936 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rodman WL, Rodman MC (1991) In the court of the rainmaker: the willing deviant in Longana. Vanuatu Anthropol 33:111–125. doi: 10.2307/25605604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Seeman M (1959) On the meaning of alienation. Am Sociol Rev 24(6):783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tolman C (1981) Karl Marx, alienation, and the mastery of nature. Environ Ethics 3(1):63–74. doi: 10.5840/enviroethics19813135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tucker RC (ed) (1978) The Marx-Engels reader. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Turner BS (1993) Outline of a theory of human rights. Sociology 27(3):489–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brandon UniversityBrandonCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Scott Grills
    • 1
  1. 1.Brandon UniversityBrandonCanada