Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics

Living Edition
| Editors: Deborah C Poff, Alex C. Michalos

Aging and Ethics

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_171-1



The salience of ethics in relation to aging is more pronounced in advanced economies, particularly Western, for three reasons: the relative size of the aging population is increasing because of fewer births; longevity has increased and the vitality of the aged in terms of physical mobility and health has greatly improved; and financial security, largely because their working lives occurred predominantly in a period of sustained economic growth, has significantly increased. In fact, people aged over 65 – the category which previously implied old, retired, and in a process of physical and mental decay awaiting death – have now been re-categorized in the “young-old” and the “old-old” (those aged 85 and above). Four major ethical concerns emerge in relation to the contemporary phenomenon of aging: (1) an aging workforce, (2) the social contribution and cost of a large aged population, (3) the impact on...


Benevolent Prejudice Elder Abuse Southern European Welfare Regime Community-wide Variation Public Healthcare Costs 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Blakely E, Snyder M (1997) Fortress America: gated communities in the United States. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Erikson EH (1950) Growth and crises of the “healthy personality”. In: Senn MJE (ed) Symposium on the healthy personality. Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Goerres A, Vanhuysse P (2011) Mapping the field: comparative generational politics and policies in aging democracies. In: Vanhuysse P, Goerres A (eds) Ageing populations in post-industrial democracies: comparative studies of policies and politics. Routledge/ECPR Studies in European Political Science, London, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  4. Gringart E, Helmes E, Speelman C (2013) Development of a measure of stereotypical attitudes towards older workers. Aust Psychol 48(2):110–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00024.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kardamanidis K, Lim K, Da Cunha C, Taylor L, Jorm L (2007) Hospital costs of older people in New South Wales in the last year of life. Med J Aust 187(7):383–386Google Scholar
  6. Killick C, Taylor B, Begley E, Anand J, O’Brien M (2015) Older people’s conceptualization of abuse: a systematic review. J Elder Abuse Negl 27(2):100–120. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2014.997374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McAdams D, De St Aubin E (1992) A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. J Pers Soc Psychol 62(6):1003–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Roberts B, Walton K, Viechtbauer W (2006) Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychol Bull 132:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tepe M, Vanhuysse P (2010) Elderly bias, new social risks, and social spending. J Eur Soc Policy 20(3):217–234. doi: 10.1177/0958928710364436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Queensland Business SchoolBrisbaneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Cristina Neesham
    • 1
  1. 1.Swinburne University of TechnologyHawthornAustralia