Skip to main content

Equity Theory of Organizations

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance

Synonyms

Fairness; Justice; Justifications; Social exchange

Definition

  • Equity: How fair a relationship is perceived to be.

  • Inputs: What a person contributes to a relationship.

  • Outcomes: What a person gets out of a relationship.

  • Profit: A person’s outcomes minus inputs.

Introduction

In the eleventh century, St. Anselm of Canterbury (1998) argued that the will possesses two competing affinities: an affection for what is to a person’s own selfish advantage andan affection for justice. The first inclination may be stronger, but the second matters, too. Equity theory, too, posits that in personal, social, and societal relationships, two concerns stand out. Firstly, how much reward does a person reap from a given social relationship? Secondly, how fair and equitable is that relationship? According to Equity theory, people feel most comfortable when their relationships are maximally profitable and they are giving and getting exactly what they deserve from their relationships – no more and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 3,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams JS (1966) Inequity in social exchange. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 2:267–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams JS, Rosenbaum WB (1962) The relationship of worker productivity to cognitive dissonance about wage inequities. J Appl Psychol 46:161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amir Y, Sharon I (1987) Are social psychological laws cross-culturally valid? J Cross Cult Psychol 18:383–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselm of Canterbury (1998) Opera omnia. In: Davies B, Evans G (eds) Anselem of Canterbury: the major works. Oxford University Press, New York. (Original work 1070 A.D.-1109 A. D.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M (2004) Wild justice, cooperation, and fair play: minding manners, being nice, and feeling good. In: Sussman R, Chapman A (eds) The origins and nature of sociality. Aldine, Chicago, pp 53–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau P (1964) Exchange and power in social life. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg JS, Hynes C, Horn JV, Grafton S, Sinnott-Armstrong W (2006) Consequences, action, and intention as factors in moral judgments: an fMRI investigation. J Cogn Neurosci 18:803–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock TC, Buss AH (1962) Dissonance, aggression, and evaluation of pain. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 65:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF (2006) At a crossroads of disciplines. J Soc Justice 19:218–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2003) Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425:297–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, Schiff HC, de Waal FBM (2005) Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272(1560):253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhokar JS, Zhuplev A, Fok LY, Hartman SJ (2001) The impact of culture on equity sensitivity perceptions and organizational citizenship behavior: a five country study. Int J Value Based Manag 14:79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides L, Tooby J (1992) Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 161–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis KE, Jones EE (1960) Changes in interpersonal perception as a means of reducing cognitive dissonance. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 61:402–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch M (1974) Awakening the sense of injustice. In: The quest for justice: myth, reality, ideal: proceedings of a conference held at the university of Waterloo, May, 1972. Holt, Rineheart, and Winston, New York, pp 19–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen KJ, Morse SJ, Bode K (1974) Overpaid or overworked. Cognitive and behavioral reactions to inequitable rewards. J Appl Soc Psychol 4:259–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gintis H, Bowles S, Boyd R, Fehr E (2003) Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evol Hum Behav 24:153–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield E, Walster GW, Berscheid E (1978) Equity: theory and research. Allyn and Bacon, Boston. ISBN 0-205-05929-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans GC (1958) Social behavior as exchange. Am J Sociol 63:97–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaques E (1961) Measurement of responsibility. Tavistock, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso G (2005) Culture and the sense of justice: a comprehensive framework for analysis. J Cross Cult Psychol 36:14–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost JT, Major B (2001) The psychology of legitimacy: emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs DL (2008) Morality: an evolutionary account. Perspect Psychol Sci 3:149–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler EE, O’Gara PW (1967) The effects of inequity produced by underpayment on work output, work quality, and attitudes toward the work. J Appl Psychol 51:403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal GS (1976) The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In: L. Berkowitz and E. Walster (Hatfield). Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 9. Academic, New York, pp 91–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal GS, Michaels JW, Sanford C (1972) Inequity and interpersonal conflict: reward allocation and secrecy about reward as methods of preventing conflict. J Pers Soc Psychol 23:88–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus HR, Kitayama S (1991) Culture and self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev 98:224–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason P (1971) Patterns of dominance. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintu-Wimsatt A (2005) Equity sensitivity and negotiation behaviors: a look at Mexican exporters. Acad Mark Sci Rev. http://www.amsreview.org/articles/wimsatt01-2005.pdf

  • Murphy-Berman V, Berman J (2002) Cross-cultural differences in perceptions of distributive justice. J Cross Cult Psychol 33:157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett R (2003) The geography of thought: how Asians and Westerners think differently … why. The Free Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters SL, van den Bos K, Karremans JC (2008) On the psychology of the advantaged: how people react to being overpaid. Soc Justice Res 21:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell LA (2005) Cross-cultural variations in distributive justice perception. Special Issue: Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 36:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Price ME, Cosmides L, Tooby J (2002) Punitive sentiment as an anti-free rider psychological device. Evol Hum Behav 23:203–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard RD, Dunnette MD, Jorgenson DO (1972) Effects of perceptions of equity and inequity on worker performance and satisfaction. J Appl Psychol Monogr 56:75–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quddus M, Bailey H III, White LR (2009) Business ethics: perspectives from Judaic, Christian, and Islamic scriptures. J Manag Spiritual Relig 6:323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raine A, Yang Y (2006) Neural foundations to moral reasoning and antisocial behavior. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 1:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson D, Snarey J, Ousley O, Harenski K, Bowman FD, Gilkey R, Kilts C (2007) The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care. Neuropsychologia 45:755–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt R, Marwell G (1972) Withdrawal and reward allocation as responses to inequity. J Exp Soc Psychol 8:207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SH (2004) Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In: Vinken H, Soeters J, Ester P (eds) Comparing cultures: dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective. Brill, Leiden, pp 43–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Skitka L, Crosby J (2003) Trends in the social psychological study of justice. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 7(4):282–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skitka LJ, Winquist J, Hutchinson S (2003) Are outcome fairness and outcome favorability distinguishable psychological constructs? A meta-analytic review. Soc Justice Res 16:309–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan CW, Stephan WG (2003) Cognition and affect in cross-cultural relations. In: Gudykunst WB, Mody B (eds) Handbook of international and intercultural communication, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 127–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes GM, Matza D (1957) Techniques of neutralization: a theory of delinquency. Am Sociol Rev 22:664–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabibnia G, Satpute AB, Lieberman MD (2008) The sunny side of fairness: preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychol Sci 19:339–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra DE, Honoree AL (2003) The relative importance of external, internal, individual and procedural equity to pay satisfaction. Compens Benefits Rev 35:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut JW, Kelley HH (1959) The social psychology of groups. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby J, Cosmides L (1996) Friendship and the Banker’s paradox: other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. Proc Br Acad 88:119–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis HC, McCusker C, Hui CH (1990) Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. J Pers Soc Psychol 59:1006–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walster GW (1975) The Walster, et al. (1973) Equity formula: a correction. Represent Res Soc Psychol 6:65–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Webley S (1993) An interfaith declaration: a code of ethics on international business for Christians, Muslims, and Jews. http://www.astro.temple.edu/~dialogue/Codes/cmj_codes.html

  • Westerman CYK, Park HS, Lee HE (2007) A test of equity theory in multidimensional friendships: a comparison of the United States and Korea. J Commun 57:576–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JQ (1993) The moral sense. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Witvliet VO, Worthington EL, Root LM, Sato AF, Ludwig TE, Exline JJ (2008) Retributive justice, restorative justice, and forgiveness: an experimental physiology analysis. J Exp Soc Psychol 44:10–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young D, Hatfield E (2011) Measuring equity in close relationships. In: Fisher TD, Davis CM, Yaber WL, Davis SL (eds) Handbook of sexuality related measures: a compendium, 3rd edn. Taylor& Francis, Thousand Oaks, pp 216–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuchtman E (1973) Reward structure, the quality of work environment, and social accounting. In: Dierkes M, Bauer RA (eds) Corporate social accounting. Praeger, New York, pp 183–190

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Elaine Hatfield , Jeanette Purvis or Richard L. Rapson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hatfield, E., Purvis, J., Rapson, R.L. (2018). Equity Theory of Organizations. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_90

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics