Synonyms
Fairness; Justice; Justifications; Social exchange
Definition
Equity: How fair a relationship is perceived to be.
Inputs: What a person contributes to a relationship.
Outcomes: What a person gets out of a relationship.
Profit: A person’s outcomes minus inputs.
Introduction
In the eleventh century, St. Anselm of Canterbury (1998) argued that the will possesses two competing affinities: an affection for what is to a person’s own selfish advantage andan affection for justice. The first inclination may be stronger, but the second matters, too. Equity theory, too, posits that in personal, social, and societal relationships, two concerns stand out. Firstly, how much reward does a person reap from a given social relationship? Secondly, how fair and equitable is that relationship? According to Equity theory, people feel most comfortable when their relationships are maximally profitable and they are giving and getting exactly what they deserve from their relationships – no more and...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams JS (1966) Inequity in social exchange. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 2:267–299
Adams JS, Rosenbaum WB (1962) The relationship of worker productivity to cognitive dissonance about wage inequities. J Appl Psychol 46:161–164
Amir Y, Sharon I (1987) Are social psychological laws cross-culturally valid? J Cross Cult Psychol 18:383–470
Anselm of Canterbury (1998) Opera omnia. In: Davies B, Evans G (eds) Anselem of Canterbury: the major works. Oxford University Press, New York. (Original work 1070 A.D.-1109 A. D.)
Bekoff M (2004) Wild justice, cooperation, and fair play: minding manners, being nice, and feeling good. In: Sussman R, Chapman A (eds) The origins and nature of sociality. Aldine, Chicago, pp 53–79
Blau P (1964) Exchange and power in social life. Wiley, New York
Borg JS, Hynes C, Horn JV, Grafton S, Sinnott-Armstrong W (2006) Consequences, action, and intention as factors in moral judgments: an fMRI investigation. J Cogn Neurosci 18:803–817
Brock TC, Buss AH (1962) Dissonance, aggression, and evaluation of pain. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 65:197–202
Brosnan SF (2006) At a crossroads of disciplines. J Soc Justice 19:218–227
Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2003) Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425:297–299
Brosnan SF, Schiff HC, de Waal FBM (2005) Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272(1560):253–258
Chhokar JS, Zhuplev A, Fok LY, Hartman SJ (2001) The impact of culture on equity sensitivity perceptions and organizational citizenship behavior: a five country study. Int J Value Based Manag 14:79–98
Cosmides L, Tooby J (1992) Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 161–228
Davis KE, Jones EE (1960) Changes in interpersonal perception as a means of reducing cognitive dissonance. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 61:402–410
Deutsch M (1974) Awakening the sense of injustice. In: The quest for justice: myth, reality, ideal: proceedings of a conference held at the university of Waterloo, May, 1972. Holt, Rineheart, and Winston, New York, pp 19–42
Gergen KJ, Morse SJ, Bode K (1974) Overpaid or overworked. Cognitive and behavioral reactions to inequitable rewards. J Appl Soc Psychol 4:259–274
Gintis H, Bowles S, Boyd R, Fehr E (2003) Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evol Hum Behav 24:153–172
Hatfield E, Walster GW, Berscheid E (1978) Equity: theory and research. Allyn and Bacon, Boston. ISBN 0-205-05929-5
Homans GC (1958) Social behavior as exchange. Am J Sociol 63:97–606
Jaques E (1961) Measurement of responsibility. Tavistock, London
Jasso G (2005) Culture and the sense of justice: a comprehensive framework for analysis. J Cross Cult Psychol 36:14–47
Jost JT, Major B (2001) The psychology of legitimacy: emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press, New York
Krebs DL (2008) Morality: an evolutionary account. Perspect Psychol Sci 3:149–172
Lawler EE, O’Gara PW (1967) The effects of inequity produced by underpayment on work output, work quality, and attitudes toward the work. J Appl Psychol 51:403–410
Leventhal GS (1976) The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In: L. Berkowitz and E. Walster (Hatfield). Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 9. Academic, New York, pp 91–131
Leventhal GS, Michaels JW, Sanford C (1972) Inequity and interpersonal conflict: reward allocation and secrecy about reward as methods of preventing conflict. J Pers Soc Psychol 23:88–102
Markus HR, Kitayama S (1991) Culture and self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev 98:224–253
Mason P (1971) Patterns of dominance. Oxford University Press, New York
Mintu-Wimsatt A (2005) Equity sensitivity and negotiation behaviors: a look at Mexican exporters. Acad Mark Sci Rev. http://www.amsreview.org/articles/wimsatt01-2005.pdf
Murphy-Berman V, Berman J (2002) Cross-cultural differences in perceptions of distributive justice. J Cross Cult Psychol 33:157–170
Nisbett R (2003) The geography of thought: how Asians and Westerners think differently … why. The Free Press, Chicago
Peters SL, van den Bos K, Karremans JC (2008) On the psychology of the advantaged: how people react to being overpaid. Soc Justice Res 21:179–191
Powell LA (2005) Cross-cultural variations in distributive justice perception. Special Issue: Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 36:1–16
Price ME, Cosmides L, Tooby J (2002) Punitive sentiment as an anti-free rider psychological device. Evol Hum Behav 23:203–231
Pritchard RD, Dunnette MD, Jorgenson DO (1972) Effects of perceptions of equity and inequity on worker performance and satisfaction. J Appl Psychol Monogr 56:75–94
Quddus M, Bailey H III, White LR (2009) Business ethics: perspectives from Judaic, Christian, and Islamic scriptures. J Manag Spiritual Relig 6:323–334
Raine A, Yang Y (2006) Neural foundations to moral reasoning and antisocial behavior. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 1:203–213
Robertson D, Snarey J, Ousley O, Harenski K, Bowman FD, Gilkey R, Kilts C (2007) The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care. Neuropsychologia 45:755–766
Schmitt R, Marwell G (1972) Withdrawal and reward allocation as responses to inequity. J Exp Soc Psychol 8:207–221
Schwartz SH (2004) Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In: Vinken H, Soeters J, Ester P (eds) Comparing cultures: dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective. Brill, Leiden, pp 43–77
Skitka L, Crosby J (2003) Trends in the social psychological study of justice. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 7(4):282–285
Skitka LJ, Winquist J, Hutchinson S (2003) Are outcome fairness and outcome favorability distinguishable psychological constructs? A meta-analytic review. Soc Justice Res 16:309–3
Stephan CW, Stephan WG (2003) Cognition and affect in cross-cultural relations. In: Gudykunst WB, Mody B (eds) Handbook of international and intercultural communication, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 127–142
Sykes GM, Matza D (1957) Techniques of neutralization: a theory of delinquency. Am Sociol Rev 22:664–670
Tabibnia G, Satpute AB, Lieberman MD (2008) The sunny side of fairness: preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychol Sci 19:339–341
Terpstra DE, Honoree AL (2003) The relative importance of external, internal, individual and procedural equity to pay satisfaction. Compens Benefits Rev 35:67–74
Thibaut JW, Kelley HH (1959) The social psychology of groups. Wiley, New York
Tooby J, Cosmides L (1996) Friendship and the Banker’s paradox: other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. Proc Br Acad 88:119–143
Triandis HC, McCusker C, Hui CH (1990) Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. J Pers Soc Psychol 59:1006–1020
Walster GW (1975) The Walster, et al. (1973) Equity formula: a correction. Represent Res Soc Psychol 6:65–67
Webley S (1993) An interfaith declaration: a code of ethics on international business for Christians, Muslims, and Jews. http://www.astro.temple.edu/~dialogue/Codes/cmj_codes.html
Westerman CYK, Park HS, Lee HE (2007) A test of equity theory in multidimensional friendships: a comparison of the United States and Korea. J Commun 57:576–598
Wilson JQ (1993) The moral sense. The Free Press, New York
Witvliet VO, Worthington EL, Root LM, Sato AF, Ludwig TE, Exline JJ (2008) Retributive justice, restorative justice, and forgiveness: an experimental physiology analysis. J Exp Soc Psychol 44:10–25
Young D, Hatfield E (2011) Measuring equity in close relationships. In: Fisher TD, Davis CM, Yaber WL, Davis SL (eds) Handbook of sexuality related measures: a compendium, 3rd edn. Taylor& Francis, Thousand Oaks, pp 216–219
Yuchtman E (1973) Reward structure, the quality of work environment, and social accounting. In: Dierkes M, Bauer RA (eds) Corporate social accounting. Praeger, New York, pp 183–190
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hatfield, E., Purvis, J., Rapson, R.L. (2018). Equity Theory of Organizations. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_90
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_90
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20927-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20928-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences