Skip to main content

Principal-Agent Theory of Organizations

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance

Synonyms

Agency theory; Institutional economics; Public choice theory; Theory of contracts; Theory of incentives

Definition

Theory of interaction between an agent and the principal for whom they act, the point being to structure incentives so that the agent will act to benefit the principal.

Introduction

The principal-agent theory of organizations (“agency theory” from here on) encapsulates the idea that public sector performance can be improved if incentive-based contracts between different actors are implemented. Principals will be more likely to achieve their desired outcomes, while agents will have clarity around work programs and goals. Agency theory has had considerable influence on the theory and practice of public administration and policy since its emergence in the 1970s. It was particularly instrumental in many high-income developed countries through the 1980s and 1990s, with often radical public sector reforms resulting. Its legacy has endured, with many public sector...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 3,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allison G (1979) Public and private management: are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? In: Shafritz J, Hyde A (eds) Classics of public administration. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton T, Cumming J, McLean J (2004) Contracting for health services in a public health system: the New Zealand experience. Health Policy 69(1):21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baehler K (2003) “Managing for outcomes”: accountability and thrust. Aust J Public Adm 62(4):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank RH, Burau V (2004) Comparative health policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen T, Laegreid P (eds) (2013) Transcending new public management: the transformation of public sector reforms. Ashgate, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon A (2004) Book review: Julian Le Grand, “motivation, agency and public policy: of knights, knaves, pawns and queens”. J Soc Policy 33(3):503–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A (2002) Incentives and organizations in the public sector: an interpretive review. J Hum Resour 32(4):696–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauld R (2007) Principal-agent theory and organisational change: lessons from New Zealand health information management. Policy Stud 28(1):17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill M, Hupe P (2002) Implementing public policy. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoque Z (2008) Measuring and reporting public sector outputs/outcomes: exploratory evidence from Australia. Int J Public Sect Manag 21(5):468–493. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810885787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingner DE, Nalbandian J, Romzek BS (2002) Politics, administration, and markets – conflicting expectations and accountability. Am Rev Public Adm 32(2):117–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffont J-J, Mortimort D (2002) The theory of incentives: the principal-agent model. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane JE (2001) From long-term to short-term contracting. Public Adm 79(1):29–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand J (2003) Motivation, agency and public policy: of knights, knaves, pawns and queens. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom C (1959) The science of muddling through. Public Adm Rev 19(2):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell W, Simmons R (1994) Beyond politics: markets, welfare, and the failure of bureaucracy. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe T (1984) The new economics of organization. Am J Polit Sci 28:739–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller D (1989) Public choice II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallesen T (2004) A political perspective on contracting out: the politics of good times. Experiences from Danish local governments. Governance 17(4):573–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1986) Complex organizations: a critical essay. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch PL, Patterson A (2000) Public sector restructuring and regional development: the impact of compulsory competitive tendering in the UK. Reg Stud 34(3):265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R (1993) Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Self P (1993) Government by the market? The politics of public choice. Westview Press, Boulder

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stretton H, Orchard L (1994) Public goods, public enterprise, public choice: theoretical foundations of the contemporary attack on government. Macmillan Press, Houndmills

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler RH (2015) Misbehaving: the making of behavioural economics. Allen Lane, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis J, Dollery B (1999) Market failure, government failure, leadership and public policy. Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh K (1995) Public services and market mechanisms: competition, contracting and the new public management. Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilsford D (1994) Path dependency, or why history makes it difficult but not impossible to reform health systems in a big way. J Public Policy 14(3):251–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JQ (1989) Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Gauld .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Gauld, R. (2018). Principal-Agent Theory of Organizations. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_72

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics