Skip to main content

Defining Quality of Care

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 252 Accesses

Abstract

The aging of the US population will place significant stress on the current health-care system. The impact of the aging population on the surgical disciplines is especially apparent given the inherent risks of undergoing surgery. It is essential that we develop strategies to deliver high quality and patient-centered care for this vulnerable population. Quality of care in surgery dates back to the early 1900s when Ernest Amory Codman was among the first to systematically measure, analyze, and compare patient care and outcomes. However, only recently has quality of care in geriatric surgery received systematic attention. For example, there have been efforts from the Institute of Medicine, American College of Surgeons, and American Geriatrics Society to improve the quality of care in this population. Using the Donabedian model of quality evaluation (e.g., structure, process, and outcomes), it is clear that there have been marked improvements within five domains important in the perioperative care of geriatric patients: cognitive impairment, functional status, frailty, medication management, and patient goals and preferences. Quality improvement in the relatively young field of geriatric surgery is progressing at a rapid rate and beginning to gain the national attention needed to optimize care for this unique patient population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. Ortman JM, Velkoff VA, Hogan H (2014) An aging nation: the older population in the United States, current population reports. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, pp 25–1140

    Google Scholar 

  2. United States Census Bureau – 2014 National Population Projections. https://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2014.html. Accessed 11 Mar 2017

  3. Hall MJ, DeFrances CJ, Williams SN, Golosinskiy A, Schwartzman A (2010) National hospital discharge survey: 2007 summary. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville

    Google Scholar 

  4. Etzioni DA, Liu JH, Maggard MA, Ko CY (2003) The aging population and its impact on the surgery workforce. Ann Surg 238(2):170–177

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Codman EA (1916) A study in hospital efficiency. Thomas Todd Co. (Boston, Mass)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson WG (2002) The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the department of veterans affairs. Arch Surg 137(1):20–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Institute of Medicine (2008) Retooling for an aging America: building the healthcare workforce. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Russell MM, Berian JR, Rosenthal RA, Ko CY (2016) Improving quality in geriatric surgery: a blueprint from the American College of Surgeons. Bull Am Coll Surg 101(12):22–28

    Google Scholar 

  9. McGory ML, Kao KK, Shekelle PG et al (2009) Developing quality indicators for elderly surgical patients. Ann Surg 250(2):338–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chow WB, Rosenthal RA, Merkow RP et al (2012) Optimal preoperative assessment of the geriatric surgical patient: a best practice guideline from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg 215(4):453–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohanty S, Rosentham RA, Russell MM, Neuman MD, Ko CY, Esnaola NF (2016) Optimal perioperative management of the geriatric patient: a best practices guideline from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg 222(5):930–947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Donabedian A (1980) The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment, vol 1. Health Administration Press, Washington, DC, p 163

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gajdos C, Kile D, Hawn MT, Finlayson E, Henderson WG, Robinson TN (2015) The significance of preoperative impaired sensorium on surgical outcomes in nonemergent general surgical operations. JAMA Surg 150(1):30–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Robinson TN, Wu DS, Pointer LF, Dunn CL, Moss M (2012) Preoperative cognitive dysfunction is related to adverse postoperative outcomes in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg 215(1):12–17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ansaloni L, Catena F, Chattat R et al (2010) Risk factors and incidence of postoperative delirium in elderly patients after elective and emergency surgery. Br J Surg 97(2):273–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gleason LJ, Schmitt EM, Kosar CM et al (2015) Effect of delirium and other major complications on outcomes after elective surgery in older adults. JAMA Surg 150(12):1134–1140

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Capezuti E, Boltz M, Cline D et al (2012) Nurses improving care for healthsystem elders – a model for optimizing the geriatric nursing practice environment. J Clin Nurs 21(21–22):3117–3125

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Inouye SK, Bogardus ST, Charpentier PA et al (1999) A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. N Engl J Med 340:669–676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reuben DB, Inouye SK, Bogardus ST, Baker DI, Leo-Summers L, Cooney LM (2000) The hospital elder life program: a model of care to prevent cognitive and functional decline in older hospitalized patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 48(12):1697–1706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults (2015) American Geriatrics Society abstracted clinical practice guideline for postoperative delirium in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 63(1):142–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmitt EM, Saczynski JS, Kosar CM et al (2015) The successful aging after elective surgery study: cohort description and data quality procedures. J Am Geriatr Soc 63(12):2463–2471

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Brouquet A, Cudennec T, Benoist S et al (2010) Impaired mobility, ASA status and administration of tramadol are risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients aged 75 years or more after major abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 251(4):759–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Scarborough JE, Bennett KM, Englum BR, Pappas TN, Lagoo-Deenadayalan SA (2015) The impact of functional dependency on outcomes after complex general and vascular surgery. Ann Surg 261(3):432–437

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Berian JR, Mohanty S, Ko CY, Rosenthal RA, Robinson TN (2016) Association of loss of independence with readmissions and death after discharge in older patients after surgical procedures. JAMA Surg 151(9):e166189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Palmer RM, Landenfeld CS, Kresevic D, Kowal J (1994) A medical unit for the acute care of the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 42(5):545–552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Counsell SR, Holder CM, Liebenaure LL et al (2000) Effects of a multicomponent intervention on functional outcomes and process of care in hospitalized older patients: a randomized controlled trial of Acute Care for Elders (ACE) in a community hospital. J Am Geriatr Soc 48(12):1572–1581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Malone ML, Vollbrecht M, Stephenson J, Burke L, Pagel P, Goodwin JS (2010) Acute Care for Elders (ACE) tracker and e-Geriatrician: methods to disseminate ACE concepts to hospitals with no geriatricians on staff. J Am Geriatr Soc 58(1):161–167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoogeboom TJ, Oosting E, Briezekolk JE et al (2012) Therapeutic validity and effectiveness of preoperative exercise on functional recovery after joint replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 7(5):e38031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bruns ER, van den Heuvel B, Buskens CJ et al (2016) The effects of physical prehabilitation in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Color Dis 18(8):O267–O277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gillis C, Li C, Lee L et al (2014) Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer. Anesthesiology 121(5):937–947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ et al (2010) Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg 210:901–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Robinson TN, Wallace JI, Wu DS et al (2011) Accumulated frailty characteristics predict postoperative discharge institutionalization in the geriatric patient. J Am Coll Surg 213:37–42

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee DH, Buth KJ, Martin BJ et al (2010) Frail patients are at increased risk for mortality and prolonged institutional care after cardiac surgery. Circulation 121:973–978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Robinson TN, Walston JD, Brummel NE et al (2015) Frailty for surgeons: review of a national institute on aging conference on frailty for specialists. J Am Coll Surg 221(6):1083–1092

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Qato DM, Alexander GC, Conti RM, Johnson M, Schumm P, Lindau ST (2008) Use of prescription and over-the-counter medications and dietary supplements among older adults in the United States. JAMA 300(24):2867–2878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Beers MH, Ouslander JG, Rollingher I, Reuben DB, Brooks J, Beck JC (1991) Explicit criteria for determining inappropriate medication use in nursing home residents. Arch Intern Med 151(9):1825–1832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. American Geriatrics Society 2015 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel (2015) American Geriatrics Society 2015 updated Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 63(11):2227–2246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Finlayson E, Maselli J, Steinman MA, Rothberg MB, Lindenauer PK, Auerbach AD (2011) Inappropriate medication use in elderly surgical patients: a national study. J Am Geriatr Soc 59(11):2139–2144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Hudhra K, Garcia-Caballos M, Casado-Fernandez E, Jucja B, Shabani D, Bueno-Cavanillas A (2016) Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescriptions identified by Beers and STOPP criteria in co-morbid older patients at hospital discharge. J Eval Clin Pract 22(2):189–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Poudel A, Ballokova A, Hubbard RE et al (2016) Algorithm of medication review in frail older people: focus on minimizing the use of high-risk medications. Geriatr Gerontol Int 16(9):1002–1013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sonnichsen A, Trampisch US, Rieckert A et al (2016) Polypharmacy in chronic diseases-reduction of inappropriate medication and adverse drug events in older populations by electronic decision support (PRIMA-eDS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 17:57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang AD, Bentrem DJ, Pappas SG et al (2004) Advance directive use among patients undergoing high-risk operations. Am J Surg 188(1):98–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Redmann AJ, Brasel KJ, Alexander CG, Schwarze ML (2012) Use of advance directives for high-risk operations: a national surgey of surgeons. Ann Surg 255(3):418–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cooper Z, Courwright A, Karlage A, Gawande A, Block S (2014) Pitfalls in communication that lead to nonbeneficial emergency surgery in elderly patients with serious illness: description of the problem and elements of a solution. Ann Surg 260(6):949–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Fahy BN (2015) Fellowship training in hospice and palliative care: new pathways for surgeons. ACS Surgery News 14 July 2015. http://www.mdedge.com/acssurgerynews/article/101238/hospice-palliative-medicine/fellowship-training-hospice-and-palliative. Accessed 11 Mar 2017

  46. Pernar LI, Peyre SE, Smink DS et al (2012) Feasibility and impact of a case-based palliative care workshop for general surgery residents. J Am Coll Surg 214:231–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Barbas AS, Haney JC, Henry BV, Heflin MT, Lagoo SA (2014) Development and implementation of a formalized geriatric surgery curriculum for general surgery residents. Gerontol Geriatr Educ 35(4):380–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Cooper Z, Koritsanszky LA, Cauley CE et al (2016) Recommendations for best communication practices to facilitate goal-concordant care for seriously ill older patients with emergency surgical conditions. Ann Surg 263(1):1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kruser JM, Nabozny MJ, Steffens NM et al (2015) “Best Case/Worst Case”: qualitative evaluation of a novel communication tool for difficult in-the-moment surgical decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc 63(9):1805–1811

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Berian JR, Rosenthal RA, Baker TL et al (2017) Hospital standards to promote optimal surgical care of the older adult: a report from the coalition for quality of care in geriatric surgery project. Ann Surg. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002185

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill Klausner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland (outside the USA)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Klausner, J., Russell, M.M. (2017). Defining Quality of Care. In: Rosenthal, R., Zenilman, M., Katlic, M. (eds) Principles and Practice of Geriatric Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20317-1_2-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20317-1_2-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20317-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20317-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics