This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Black, H., & Monteverde, K. (1975). Non-verbal communication and person perception: An empirical investigation. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 12(1), 24–26.
Brinig, M. F. (1990). Rings and promises. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 6, 203–215.
Camerer, C. (1988). Gifts as economic signals and social symbols. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S180–S214.
Cronk, L., & Dunham, B. (2007). Amounts spent on engagement rings reflect aspects of male and female mate quality. Human Nature, 18, 329–333.
Dugatkin, L. A. (2000). The imitation factor: Evolution beyond the gene. New York: Free Press.
Dunham, B. L. (2011). Applications of signaling theory to contemporary human courtship. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 72, 991.
Francis-Tan, A., & Mialon, H. M. (2015). “A diamond is forever” and other fairy tales: The relationship between wedding expenses and marriage duration. Economic Inquiry, 53(4), 1919–1930.
Gaulin, S. J. C., & Boster, J. S. (1990). Dowry as female competition. American Anthropologist, 92, 994–1005.
Grammer, K. (1992). Variations on a theme: Age dependent mate selection in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 100–102.
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Ackerman, J. M., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., & White, A. E. (2012). The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024761.
Haas, D. F., & Deseran, F. A. (1981). Trust and symbolic exchange. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(1), 3–13.
Hughes, S. M., & Aung, T. (2016). Modern day female preferences for resources and provisioning by long-term mates. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11(3), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000084.
Ogletree, S. M. (2010). With this ring, I thee wed: Relating gender and love styles to attitudes towards engagement rings. Gender Issues, 27, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-010-9090-z.
Parsons, K. (2008). Subverting the fellowship of the wedding ring. Journal of Social Philosophy, 39(3), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2008.00432.x.
Pawłowski, B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1999). Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 266, 281–285.
Rothman, E. (1987). Hands and hearts: A history of courtship in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schweingruber, D., Cast, A. D., & Anahita, S. (2008). ‘A story and a ring’: Audience judgments about engagement proposals. Sex Roles, 58(3–4), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9330-1.
Tushnet, R. (1998). Rules of engagement. Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. 107 Yale L. J. 2583 (1997–1998).
Uller, T., & Johansson, L. (2003). Human mate choice and the wedding ring effect: Are married men more attractive? Human Nature, 14, 267–276.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hughes, S.M. (2021). Engagement Rings as Modern Commitment Cue. In: Shackelford, T.K., Weekes-Shackelford, V.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_3656
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_3656
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19649-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19650-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences