Skip to main content

Supernormal Stimuli (Konrad Lorenz)

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 518 Accesses

Synonyms

Artificially exaggerated stimulus; Optimally primed stimulus; Super-stimulus; Supernormal sign stimulus.

Definition

Supernormal sign stimuli – a term invented by Niko Tinbergen and now usually abbreviated simply as supernormal stimuli (1951, 44) – are exaggerated/heightened imitations of naturally evolved phenomena/objects that exert a stronger attraction/desire on their target audience than the natural phenomena/objects themselves (Barrett 2010, 3). According to Tinbergen, the phenomenon was first reported by O. Koehler and A. Zagarus (1937), but it was then further developed by Tinbergen together with his colleague Konrad Lorenz. An example of a supernormal stimulus from the natural world is the cuckoo egg. Cuckoo eggs appear very similar to those of their host but are usually somewhat larger and/or brighter.

It has been suggested in evolutionary terms that “instances of supernormality may reflect the action of two factors during phylogeny: (a) asymmetrical selection...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barlow, N. (Ed.). (2005 [1887]). The autobiography of Charles Darwin. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, D. (2010). Supernormal stimuli: How primal urges overran their evolutionary purpose. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1975). Ethology: The biology of behavior. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geher, G. (2015). The Paris attacks as super-normal stimuli. Psychology Today. Available at: https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/darwins-subterranean-world/201512/the-paris-attacks-super-normal-stimuli. Accessed 12 Sept 2018.

  • Gold, I., & Roskies, A. (2008). Philosophy of neuroscience. In M. Ruse (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the philosophy of biology (pp. 349–379). Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, O., & Zagarus, A. (1937). Beitrage zum Brutverhalten des Halsbandregenpfeifers. Beitr Fortpfl biol Vogel, 13, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, H. (2012). Who says pornography can’t be art? In H. Maes & J. Levinson (Eds.), Art and pornography: Philosophical essays (pp. 1–17). Oxford: OUP.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, P. H., White, J., Morrison, E. R., & Fisher, K. (2013). High heels as supernormal stimuli: How wearing high heels affects judgments of female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(3), 176–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., & Fogassi, L. (2007). Mirror neurons and social cognition. In R. I. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 179–195). Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad, G. (2011). The consuming instinct: What juicy burgers, Ferraris, pornography, and gift giving reveal about human nature. New York: Prometheus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staddon, J. E. R. (1975). A note on the evolutionary significance of “supernormal” stimuli. The American Naturalist, 109(969), 541–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature/Sexual culture (pp. 80–119). Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. (1996). The prehistory of sex: Four million years of human sexual culture. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N. (1951). The study of instinct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N., & Perdeck, A. C. (1950). On the stimulus situation releasing the begging response in the newly hatched Herring Gull chick. Behavior, 3, 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visalberghi, E., & Fragaszy, D. (1990). Do monkeys ape? In S. T. Parker & K. R. Gibson (Eds.), “Language” and intelligence in monkeys and apes (pp. 247–272). Cambridge: CUP.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, C., & Wright, W. (2009). Enactivism’s vision: Neurocognitive basis or neurocognitively baseless? In J. Bickle (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy and neuroscience (pp. 251–309). Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, C. (1989). Right brain sex: Using creative visualization to enhance sexual pleasure. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, R. (2002). Human instinct: How our primeval impulses shape our modern lives. London: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Barnett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Barnett, V. (2021). Supernormal Stimuli (Konrad Lorenz). In: Shackelford, T.K., Weekes-Shackelford, V.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_3573

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics