Definition
Modern theories of language represent efforts to account for the evolution, acquisition, and processing of language within an integrated framework. Such efforts acknowledge the relationship of language to sensorimotor experience, social interaction, and general cognitive constraints on information processing.
Introduction
The study of language is a diverse field that engages the applied interests of educators and speech pathologists as well as the academic interests of researchers working in wide range of disciplines including linguistics, speech and hearing sciences, psychology, biology, computer science, philosophy, sociology, and anthropology. Scholars in these different disciplines invariably conceptualize language in different ways, viewing it, e.g., as a biological attribute, a cultural trait, a set of communication skills, or a...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Altmann, G. T., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264.
Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1281–1289.
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2016). Creating language: Integrating evolution, acquisition, and processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 11–15.
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Frank, M. C., & Goodman, N. D. (2012). Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games. Science, 336(6084), 998–998.
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6(4), 291–325.
Gleitman, L. R., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2005). Hard words. Language Learning and Development, 1(1), 23–64.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). How gesture promotes learning throughout childhood. Child Development Perspectives, 3(2), 106–111.
Goldstein, M. H., King, A. P., & West, M. J. (2003). Social interaction shapes babbling: Testing parallels between birdsong and speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(13), 8030–8035.
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569–1579.
James, K. H., & Swain, S. N. (2011). Only self-generated actions create sensori-motor systems in the developing brain. Developmental Science, 14(4), 673–678.
Karasik, L. B., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Adolph, K. E. (2011). Transition from crawling to walking and infants’ actions with objects and people. Child Development, 82(4), 1199–1209.
Kirby, S., Dowman, M., & Griffiths, T. L. (2007). Innateness and culture in the evolution of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(12), 5241–5245.
Levinson, S. C. (2016). Turn-taking in human communication: Origins and implications for language processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), 6–14.
Lewis, A. G., & Bastiaansen, M. (2015). A predictive coding framework for rapid neural dynamics during sentence-level language comprehension. Cortex, 68, 155–168.
Lieberman, P. (2012). Vocal tract anatomy and the neural bases of talking. Journal of Phonetics, 40(4), 608–622.
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676–703.
Massaro, D. W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1–86.
Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P., Lambertz, G., Halsted, N., Bertoncini, J., & Amiel-Tison, C. (1988). A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29(2), 143–178.
Morgan, J. L., & Demuth, K. (Eds.). (1996). Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Ninio, A. (2006). Language and the learning curve: A new theory of syntactic development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ninio, A. (2014). Learning a generative syntax from transparent syntactic atoms in the linguistic input. Journal of Child Language, 41, 1249–1275.
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(4), 633–651.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347.
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bornstein, M. H., & Baumwell, L. (2001). Maternal responsiveness and children’s achievement of language milestones. Child Development, 72(3), 748–767.
Tomasello, M. (1999). Cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73(2), 89–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kempe, V., Brooks, P.J. (2021). Modern Theories of Language. In: Shackelford, T.K., Weekes-Shackelford, V.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_3321
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_3321
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19649-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19650-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences