Synonyms
Definition
When some females in a population have more surviving offspring than other females in the population.
Introduction
Variance in reproductive success occurs when some individuals in a community have more surviving offspring than others and is typically discussed as a result of sexual selection (Trivers 1972). Sexual selection is a competition within one sex for sexual access to members of the opposite sex and a differential choice by members of one sex to breed with particular members of the opposite sex. The traditional view among evolutionary biologists is that males compete against each other for access to females, and females are coy and choosy in determining who they will mate with. In his experiments with Drosophila melanogaster, Bateman (1948) provided evidence for these conjectures and also showed that male reproductive success varied much more than female reproductive success. That is, many more males than females produced zero surviving...
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
References
Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349–368.
Beckerman, S., Lizarralde, R., Lizarralde, M., Bai, J., Ballew, C., Schroeder, S., et al. (2002). The Bari partible paternity project, phase one. In S. Beckerman & P. Valentine (Eds.), Cultures of multiple fathers: The theory and practice of partible paternity in lowland South America (pp. 27–41). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Brown, G. R., Laland, K. N., & Borgerhoff, M. M. (2009). Bateman’s principles and human sex roles. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24(6), 297–304.
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (Ed.). (1988). Reproductive success: Studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–223.
Haddix, K. A. (1999). “Excess women”: Non-marriage and reproduction in two ethnic Tibetan communities of Humal, Nepal. Himalayan Research Bulletin, 19(1), 56–62.
Hrdy, S. B. (1980). The langurs of Abu: Female and male strategies of reproduction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Jennions, M. D., & Petrie, M. (2000). Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biology Review, 75, 21–64.
Scelza, B. A. (2011). Female choice and extra-pair paternity in a traditional human population. Biology Letters, 7, 889–891.
Starkweather, K. E., & Hames, R. B. (2012). A survey of non-classical polyandry. Human Nature, 23(2), 149–172.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Starkweather, K. (2021). Variance in Female Reproductive Success. In: Shackelford, T.K., Weekes-Shackelford, V.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_120
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_120
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19649-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19650-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences