Advertisement

E-Portfolios as Digital Assessment Tools in Higher Education

  • Min Yang
  • Tianchong Wang
  • Cher Ping LimEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter examines the role of e-portfolios as digital assessment tools in enhancing the quality of student learning outcomes in higher education. E-portfolios tap into the potential of digital technologies to support students’ self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and sharing of learning. Thus, e-portfolios have been reported as bringing about improvements in student learning. On the other hand, existing research also shows challenges for teachers of higher education institutions (HEIs) when adopting e-portfolio assessment. To formulate strategies for optimizing the learning potential of e-portfolios, a landscape review of research literature is conducted to address the research question: How are e-portfolios used as digital assessment tools to enhance the quality of learning outcomes in higher education?

The chapter begins with an overview of e-portfolios as digital assessment tools. A typology of e-portfolios is then presented to analyze the situations where e-portfolios are applied in higher education. The chapter goes on to argue for two essential affordances of e-portfolios, namely: (a) empowerment and ownership of learning for students and (b) feedback and interactivity by drawing on digital technology. This is followed by a discussion of challenges and opportunities of e-portfolios in meeting conventional assessment criteria, including: reliability, validity, authenticity, and honesty. Key pedagogical factors influencing the use of e-portfolios as digital assessment are then examined, giving rise to four strategies for effective implementation of e-portfolios:
  • Analysis of students’ learning needs and contexts for using e-portfolios

  • Constructive alignment between learning, teaching, and assessment

  • Scaffolding of students’ learning progress through task design

  • Capacity building and sustained support for students and teachers

By considering these strategies, teachers of HEIs are likely to maximize the affordances of e-portfolios, and ultimately enhance the quality of learning outcomes. Along with these strategies, this chapter points out several aspects of e-portfolio implementation that warrant future research.

Keywords

e-portfolios Digital assessment Learning outcomes Assessment criteria Higher education 

References

  1. Ayan, D., & Seferoğlu, G. (2011). Using electronic portfolios to promote reflective thinking in language teacher education. Educational Studies, 37(5), 513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balaban, I., Divjak, B., & Mu, E. (2011). Meta-model of ePortfolio usage in different environments. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 6(3), 35–41.Google Scholar
  3. Barbera, E. (2009). Mutual feedback in e-portfolio assessment: An approach to the netfolio system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 342–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00803.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barrot, J. S. (2016). Using Facebook-based e-portfolio in ESL writing classrooms: Impact and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/07908318.2016.1143481
  6. Beck, R. J., Livne, N. L., & Bear, S. L. (2005). Teachers’ self-assessment of the effects of formative and summative electronic portfolios on professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beckers, J., Dolmans, D., & van Merrienboer, J. (2016). E-portfolios enhancing students’ self-directed learning: A systematic review of influencing factors. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 32–46.Google Scholar
  8. Berlin, S. J., Adam, G. J., Bolea, P. S., & Borst, J. M. (2015). Blending reflection and benchmarks: Development of a comprehensive assessment model for social work education. Assessment Update, 27(6), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning (4th ed.). Buckingham, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolliger, D. U., & Shepherd, C. E. (2010). Student perceptions of ePortfolio integration in online courses. Distance Education, 31(3), 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2012). The problem with feedback. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 11–32). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Buckley, S., Coleman, J., Davison, I., Khan, K. S., Zamora, J., Malick, S., … Sayers, J. (2009). The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: A best evidence medical education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11. Medical Teacher, 31(4), 340–355. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897
  14. Bures, E. M., Barclay, A., Abrami, P. C., & Meyer, E. J. (2013). The reality of assessing “authentic” electronic portfolios: Can electronic portfolios serve as a form of standardized assessment to measure literacy and self-regulated learning at the elementary level? Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(4), 1.Google Scholar
  15. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buzzetto-More, N. (2010). Assessing the efficacy and effectiveness of an e-portfolio used for summative assessment. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6(1), 61–85.Google Scholar
  17. Buzzetto-More, N., & Alade, A. (2008). The pentagonal e-portfolio model for selecting, adopting, building, and implementing an e-portfolio. Journal of Information Technology Education, 7, IIP45–IIP70.Google Scholar
  18. Cambridge, D. (2008). Universities as responsive learning organizations through competency-based assessment with electronic portfolios. The Journal of General Education, 57(1), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cassidy, S. (2011). Self-regulated learning in higher education: Identifying key component processes. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 989–1000. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.503269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chang, C.-C., & Wu, B.-H. (2012). Is teacher assessment reliable or valid for high school students under a web-based portfolio environment? Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 265–278.Google Scholar
  21. Chang, C.-C., Liang, C., & Chen, Y.-H. (2013). Is learner self-assessment reliable and valid in a web-based portfolio environment for high school students? Computers & Education, 60(1), 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen, H. (2009). Using ePortfolios to support lifelong and lifewide learning. In D. Cambridge, B. Cambridge, & K. B. Yancey (Eds.), Electronic portfolios 2.0: Emergent research on implementation and impact (pp. 29–35). Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
  23. Cheng, G. (2008). Implementation challenges of the English language ePortfolio system from various stakeholder perspectives. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 37(1), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2012). Exploring the relationship between students’ self-regulated learning ability and their ePortfolio achievement. The Internet and Higher Education, 37(1), 97–118.Google Scholar
  25. Chuang, H.-H. (2010). Weblog-based electronic portfolios for student teachers in Taiwan. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clark, J. E., & Eynon, B. (2009). E-portfolios at 2.0 – Surveying the field. Peer Review, 11(1), 18–23.Google Scholar
  27. Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Davies, M., & Sinclair, A. (2013). The effectiveness of on-line discussions for preparing students for a Paideia seminar. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(2), 173–191. doi: 10.1080/1475939x.2013.773719 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Deneen, C., Brown, G., & Carless, D. (2017). Students’ conceptions of eportfolios as assessment and technology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–10.Google Scholar
  30. Dunbar-Hall, P., Rowley, J., Brooks, W., Cotton, H., & Lill, A. (2015). E-portfolios in music and other performing arts education: History through a critique of literature. Journal of Historical Research in Music Education, 36(2), 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eduardo, G.-J. (2015). Assessment of learning: From feedback to self-regulation. The role of technologies. RELIEVE, 21(2), 1–21. doi: 10.7203/relieve.21.2.7546 Google Scholar
  32. Elton, L., & Johnston, B. (2002). Assessment in Universities: A critical review of research.Google Scholar
  33. Evans, M. A., & Powell, A. (2007). Conceptual and practical issues related to the design for and sustainability of communities of practice: The case of e-portfolio use in preservice teacher training. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(2), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Green, J., Wyllie, A., & Jackson, D. (2014). Electronic portfolios in nursing education: A review of the literature. Nurse Education in Practice, 14(1), 4–8. 5p. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2013.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximising impact on learning. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Hatzipanagos, S., & Warburton, S. (2009). Feedback as dialogue: Exploring the links between formative assessment and social software in distance learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(1), 45–59. doi: 10.1080/17439880902759919 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heath, M. (2005). Are you ready to go digital? The pros and cons of electronic portfolio development. Library Media Connection, 23(7), 66–70.Google Scholar
  39. Heinrich, E., Bhattacharya, M., & Rayudu, R. (2007). Preparation for lifelong learning using ePortfolios. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 653–663. doi: 10.1080/03043790701520602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Herman, C., & Kirkup, G. (2008). Learners in transition: The use of ePortfolios for women returners to science, engineering and technology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(1), 67–76. doi: 10.1080/14703290701757468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hung, S.-T. A. (2012). A washback study on e-portfolio assessment in an English as a foreign language teacher preparation program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kersten, F. (2004). E-portfolios for the internet job hunt. Teaching Music, 11(4), 40–44.Google Scholar
  43. Klenowski, V., Askew, S., & Carnell, E. (2006). Portfolios for learning, assessment and professional development in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li, J., & De Luca, R. (2014). Review of assessment feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 378–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lin, Q. (2008). Preservice teachers’ learning experiences of constructing e-portfolios online. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 194–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause Learning Initiative, 1(2007), 1–12.Google Scholar
  47. Lorenzo, G., & Ittelson, J. (2005). An overview of e-portfolios. EDUCAUSE learning initiative. Advancing learning through IT innovation. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3001.pdf
  48. Luchoomun, D., McLuckie, J., & van Wesel, M. (2010). Collaborative e-learning: E-portfolios for assessment, teaching and learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 8(1), 21–30.Google Scholar
  49. McNamara, L. T., & Bailey, R. L. (2006). Faculty/staff perceptions of a standards-based exit portfolio system for graduate students. Innovative Higher Education, 31(2), 129–141. doi: 10.1007/s10755-006-9013-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Messick, S. (1986). The once and future issues of validity: Assessing the meaning and consequences of measurement. In H. Wainer, H. I. Braun, H. Wainer, & H. I. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 33–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  51. Mok, J. (2012). As a student, I do think that the learning effectiveness of electronic portfolios depends, to quite a large extent, on the attitude of students! Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10(4), 407–416.Google Scholar
  52. Nicol, D., & MacFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Orlan-Barak, L. (2005). Portfolios as evidence of reflective practice: What remains untold. Educational Research, 47(1), 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peacock, S., Gordon, L., Murray, S., Morss, K., & Dunlop, G. (2010). Tutor response to implementing an ePortfolio to support learning and personal development in further and higher education institutions in Scotland. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 827–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pecheone, R., Pigg, M., Chung, R., & Souviney, R. (2005). Performance assessment and electronic portfolios: Their effect on teacher learning and education. The Clearing House, 78(4), 164–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Perlman, R. L., Ross, P. T., Christner, J., & Lypson, M. L. (2011). Faculty reflections on the implementation of socio-cultural e-portfolio assessment tool. Reflective Practice, 12(3), 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ramey, S. L., & Hay, M. L. (2003). Using electronic portfolios to measure student achievement and assess curricular integrity. Nurse Educator, 28(1), 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sánchez Gómez, S., Ostos, E. M. C., Solano, J. M. M., & Salado, T. F. H. (2013). An electronic portfolio for quantitative assessment of surgical skills in undergraduate medical education. BMC Medical Education, 13, 65–65. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (2003). Clarifying different types of portfolio use. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(6), 625–648. doi: 10.1080/0260293032000130252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stefani, L., Mason, R., & Pegler, C. (2007). The educational potential of e-portfolios: Supporting personal development and reflective learning. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Strudler, N., & Wetzel, K. (2005). The diffusion of electronic portfolios in teacher education: Issues of initiation and implementation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(4), 411–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tochel, C., Haig, A., Hesketh, A., Cadzow, A., Beggs, K., Colthart, I., & Peacock, H. (2009). The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12. Medical Teacher, 31(4), 320–339. doi: 10.1080/01421590902883056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tosh, D., Light, T. P., Fleming, K., & Haywood, J. (2005). Engagement with electronic portfolios: Challenges from the student perspective. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3), 1–19.Google Scholar
  65. Van Tartwijk, J., & Driessen, E. W. (2009). Portfolios for assessment and learning: AMEE Guide no. 45. Medical Teacher, 31(9), 790–801. doi: 10.1080/01421590903139201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wetzel, K., & Strudler, N. (2005). The diffusion of electronic portfolios in teacher education: Next steps and recommendations from accomplished users. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students’ reflective learning processes. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yang, M., Tai, M., & Lim, C. P. (2015). The role of e-portfolios in supporting productive learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 1276. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yu, T. (2012). E-portfolio, a valuable job search tool for college students. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29(1), 70–76. doi: 10.1108/10650741211192064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. doi: 10.3102/0002831207312909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and InstructionThe Education University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations