What Motivates Exemplary Online Teachers? A Multiple-Case Study
Teachers’ embracing of online teaching is a key factor in the growth of online education. While it is critical to examine exemplary online teachers’ practices to present models for successful online teaching, limited research exists on why exemplary teachers decide to teach online. In order to identify strategies for supporting online teachers, a multiple case study was conducted in the context of a large research university in the Midwestern United States. Ethnographic interviews were conducted with six online teachers identified as exemplary. Results suggested that both intrinsic factors (e.g., observing exemplary courses, having a background in distance education, answering the needs of nontraditional students, and trying alternative approaches to online teaching) and extrinsic factors (e.g., technology, pedagogy, professional development, and financial support) influenced exemplary online teachers’ decisions to teach online. The results of this study reveal critical recommendations for faculty support and development for online teaching.
Keywordse-Learning Multiple case study Online teacher
- Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Newburyport, MA: Online Learning Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradechange.pdf.Google Scholar
- Baran, E., Correia, A.-P., & Thompson, A. (2013). Tracing successful online teaching in higher education: Voices of exemplary online teachers. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–41.Google Scholar
- Bonk, C. (2006). Online teaching in an online world. Bloomington, IN: CourseShare.com. Retrieved from http://www.publicationshare.com/docs/faculty_survey_report.pdf.Google Scholar
- Brooks, C. F. (2010). Toward ‘hybridised’ faculty development for the twenty-first century: Blending online communities of practice and face-to-face meetings in instructional and professional support programmes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chang, C., Shen, H.-Y., & Liu, Z.-F. (2014). University faculty’s perspectives on the roles of e-instructors and their online instruction practice. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3). Retrieved from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1654/2899.
- De Boer, W., & Collis, B. (2005). Becoming more systematic about flexible learning: Beyond time and distance. Research in Learning Technology, 13(1). Retrieved from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/10971.
- Glaser, B. G. (2002). Constructivist grounded theory? Forum Qualitative Social Research, 3(3). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/825.
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Levine, A., & Sun, J. (2002). Barriers to distance education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Maguire, L. (2005). Literature review – faculty participation in online distance education: Barriers and motivators. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring81/maguire81.htm.
- Major, C. (2010). Do virtual professors dream of electric students? College faculty experiences with online distance education. Teachers College Record, 112(8), 2154–2208.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ndubisi, N. O. (2006). Factors of online learning adoption: A comparative juxtaposition of the theory of planned behavior and the technology acceptance model. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(4), 571–591.Google Scholar
- O’Quinn, L. (2002). Factors that deter faculty from participating in distance education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(4). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter54/Quinn54.htm.
- Schifter, C. (2000). Faculty motivators and inhibitors for participation in distance education. Educational Technology, 40(2), 43–46.Google Scholar
- Seaman, J. (2009). Online learning as a strategic asset. Volume II: The paradox of faculty voices. Washington DC: Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities, Sloan Consortium, and Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.aplu.org/NetCommunity/Document.Doc?id=1879
- Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Ulmer, L., Watson, L., & Derby, D. (2007). Perceptions of higher education faculty members on the value of distance education. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(1), 59–70.Google Scholar
- Van De Vord, R., & Pogue, K. (2012). Teaching time investment: Does online really take more time than face-to-face? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(3), 132–146. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1190/2212.Google Scholar
- Wan, E. (2005). Teacher empowerment: Concepts, strategies, and implications for schools in Hong Kong. Teachers College Record, 107(4), 842–861.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Zhang, J., & Walls, R. (2009). Instructors’ self-perceived pedagogical principle implementation in the online environment. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(4), 413–426.Google Scholar